...You are viewing the 2005 Archives...

If there was any doubt left in anybody’s mind about Mr. Alito’s suitability for the Supreme Court, all you’d have to do would be to look up the spastic reactions of the national socialist left as they crap their diapers and choke on their oatmeal.

We bring you drunk driver, murderer, fugitive from justice and known tax evader and blabbering alcoholic Fat Ted *hic* Kennedy:

Rather than selecting a nominee for the good of the nation and the court, President Bush has picked a nominee whom he hopes will stop the massive hemorrhaging of support on his right wing. This is a nomination based on weakness, not on strength.

Because, as we all know, the most convincing show of strength imaginable is for a President to nominate somebody completely opposite of what the voters who elected him believe in. That’s how Scalia, Rehnquist and Thomas came to be nominated by Bill Klintoon, after all. Well, except that they weren’t.

After insisting that Harriet Miers shouldn’t even get a hearing because she couldn’t prove she was extreme enough,

…or qualified enough, for that matter. But then again, if qualifications meant anything on the laughably incompetent left, they’d have run out of candidates for anything about five minutes after they emerged. Who were talking about her not getting a hearing, by the way? We surely weren’t. She could’ve had all the hearings she wanted to have, but the chances of her having even one plummeted rather abruptly when she couldn’t even fill in the initial questionnaire without making the committee wonder if her dog had done the answering.

…the far right has now forced the President to choose a nominee that they think has views as extreme as their own.

…one of our extreme views being that the Constitution says what the Constitution says and nothing more, which, strangely, coincides perfectly with the extreme platform that the President was pledging himself to when we voted for him.

There are many serious questions about whether Judge Alito is a mainstream nominee fit to fill the seat of Justice O’Connor. She was able to unite and strengthen our country through her careful, non-ideological approach to the law.

We love it when a hypocritical liberal fuck says “non-ideological”, because it invariably means “in lockstep with liberal ideology.”

Although he is clearly intelligent and experienced on the bench, that is only the beginning of our inquiry. If confirmed, Alito could very well fundamentally alter the balance of the court and push it dangerously to the right, placing at risk decades of American progress in safeguarding our fundamental rights and freedoms.

…none of which “fundamental rights and freedoms” are mentioned in as much as a comma of the actual Constitution that the Supreme Court is sworn to uphold but that, of course, is entirely beside the point. The point is that those “fundamental rights and freedoms” are dictates and decrees passed from on high on issues that liberals could never get the voters’ backing of, so they resorted to having unelected fuckwits in robes invent them instead.

After stating that he believed in a diverse bench, President Bush took the nation a step backwards today.

We agree. He should’ve nominated a female minority instead. Like, say, Janice Rogers Brown. Why don’t you just quit while you’re behind, you fat old murdering pissbucket?

Apparently, he couldn’t find a woman or minority…

Like Janice Rogers Brown?

…or a mainstream nominee that meets the litmus tests of the right wing,

Sort of hard to find a “mainstream” (i.e. to the left of Fidel Castro) nominee who’d meet any sort of test by anybody not beholden to the principles of national socialism, wouldn’t you say? And who exactly are you to bleat about “litmus tests”, you bloated landwhale?

…and instead put forth a nominee with a troubling record on the rights and freedoms important to America’s families.

…particularly the “rights” of liberal multi-millionaire families with a track record that would make Che Guevara blush.

The Senate will now fulfill its constitutional role and conduct thorough and fair hearings to determine Judge Alito’s fitness to sit on the highest court in the land. There are few decisions as important as picking a Supreme Court Justice, and the Senate must not be rushed in considering this nomination.

That’s the cutest way of saying “filibuster” we’ve heard in a long time.

How about we put a gun to your dumb, inebriated, grotesquely supersized head and say “vote, dammit?”

It would be a damn sight more fair than the “choice” you gave Mary Jo Kopechne.

9 Responses to “Drooling Leftard Meltdown Bonanza!”
  1. Unregistered Comment by LCkschlenker UNITED STATES

    I heard about Bush new pick, and it was like Damn, he figured out why everyone got so ticked.

    And hell, anyone who pisses off Kennedy, the ACLU, and Reid has to be a great pick.

  2. Unregistered Comment by LCkschlenker UNITED STATES

    Bush’s pick.
    PIMF.
    Oh, and first…

  3. Unregistered Comment by LC Brilliant Pebble UNITED STATES

    True, a good pick, but we need to face the fact that ANYONE Bush would choose would piss off those idiots. The only reason Miers didnt raise any real concern is because she was such a dolt that the left could choose to pass or deny her quite easily.

    The greasy harpy-whores like Feinstein and Boxer are going to give Alito a good dose of anecdotal bullshit before they vote ‘NO’ anyway, the usual stories of young girls dying with hangers dangling from their stash, so Alito should just come out and say it, “Roe goes away the day I take office”.

    Shove the truth straight down their lesbian throats and let them choke on it.

  4. Unregistered Comment by SirChristopher ISE UNITED STATES

    We love it when a hypocritical liberal fuck says “non-ideological”, because it invariably means “in lockstep with liberal ideology.”

    or THEology!

  5. LC MoparMike, Dept. of Common Sense Comment by LC MoparMike, Dept. of Common Sense UNITED STATES

    I too would have liked to see JRB. Alito hasn’t won me over, but that is because I haven’t done any research. Although, I would like to see what his reasoning (and thourough details of) on the case listed in the Dhims protest list as “Alito Supported Police Officer’s Clear Violation of Constitutional Rights“, so that I can get all the facts and make a reasoned and educated opinion on his beliefs on what rights I have if I am arrested.

  6. Unregistered Comment by juandos UNITED STATES

    Pruden from the Washington Times: California is as far from the reality where the rest of us live as you can get and still keep your feet dry. Californians think Geena Davis, the star of the new television fantasy “Commander in Chief,” really is the commander in chief.
    So when the ground shifted yesterday with the nomination of Samuel Alito to the United States Supreme Court — a solid 7 on the Richter scale — nearly everyone here wondered why that nice, sensible President Davis would have done something like that.

  7. maxxdog Comment by maxxdog UNITED STATES

    Doesn’t it just “feel” better to have Fat Teddy and his ilk seething and screeching then what we saw with the Miers nomination? Hehe

  8. Elephant Man Comment by Elephant Man UNITED STATES

    Ted Zeppelin comments on Alito in 1990:

    “You have obviously had a very distinguished record, and I certainly commend you for long service in the public interest. I think it is a very commendable career, and I am sure you will have a successful one as a judge.”

    Ted Zeppelin comments on Alito in 2005:

    There are many serious questions about whether Judge Alito is a mainstream nominee fit to fill the seat of Justice O’Connor.

    After stating that he believed in a diverse bench, President Bush took the nation a step backwards today. Apparently, he couldn’t find a woman or minority or a mainstream nominee that meets the litmus tests of the right wing, and instead put forth a nominee with a troubling record on the rights and freedoms important to America’s families.

    Also of note, the Democrats confirmed him unanimously to the circuit court.

    Once again, President (insert inane and idiotic moonbat reference to Bush here) and the diobolical Karl Rove outwit the hapless donks….

    And just last week the democrats were capering and clapping their furry little paws together with unmitigated glee at the thought of an “indicted Rove, a GOP engaged in civil war and a lame duck president”….

    :lol:

  9. Unregistered Comment by DumbAss Tanker UNITED STATES

    If Reid, Schumer, Kerry, Kennedy and the rest of the Army of Darkness like what you’ve done, it’s a sure sign you screwed the pooch.

    When they scream in pain, on the other hand, life is good!