...You are viewing the 2005 Archives...

His Majesty has really, really been trying to do his damndest to keep out of the Pajamas Media Open Source Media brou-ha-ha, and for very good reasons too:

I don’t have a dog in that hunt. I’m not in the least bit pissed off at being “passed over”, because I never was passed over. I didn’t ever bother to apply for membership in this new club, even though it was quite open to everybody, so I wasn’t “scorned” in any way. I didn’t apply because I don’t much care for cliques and, just as importantly, because I feel that if you sign up for something, you have an obligation to contribute, and I have an in-built aversion against making promises that I’m not sure that I can keep. Besides, I love blogging because it lets me say whatever the heck I want to whenever I want. I’m very grateful that it seems to strike a chord with so many people and I can’t even begin to describe how grateful I am for all of the friendships I’ve made as a result of it, friendships that have pulled me through some pretty horrid times, to say the very least, friends that I wouldn’t swap for all the gold in the world and friends that I probably would have never made if it wasn’t for my compulsion to blog. But I still blog because I love it, because it’s who I am, and I’m vain enough to think that that’s one of the main reasons that you guys and gals bother to read my drivel, not because I’m a member of some exclusive club. I’m me, and what you get is what I am.

Anyway, I’m not feeling scorned by Open Source Media. If I were, it’d be my own damn fault, so scratch that.

Also, we have a lot of friends who are contributors to OSM, and the last thing we’d want would be to wish them ill.

Just so’s to get the obvious “you’re just envious” and “sour grapes” nonsense out of the way. I wish OSM well, and I hope that they make a trillion dollars and fundamentally change news or whatever their mission statement happens to be at the moment.

And that’s the problem.

What the Hell IS their mission statement?

Take one of my most recent additions to the blogroll, WatchingAmerica.com, they’ve got a mission: To expose the foreign press by translating their native screeds into English. Or the excellent Milblogging.com, who’ve made it their mission to make it easy for the rest of us to find blogs by members of the military. Or Stop the ACLU, keeping an eye on the ACLU’s every move. They all have a mission. You don’t have to have one to be excellent, a lot of my compulsive reads don’t, but I know what they’re about, which is what I always thought was at the center of any business (not suggesting that any of those sites are a business).

But just what the Heck is OSM?

Is it a feed from a gazillion other blogs? I’ve heard of that, it’s called RSS and I already have a client taking care of mine, I don’t really need duplicates.

Is it an alternative to the main stream media? Great. Except they’re feeding off the MSM just like the rest of us and, as I already mentioned, I already have feeds from my favorite blogs installed.

Oh well, they managed to gather up $3.5 million in venture capital, so who am I to argue with success?

I don’t care. As I already said, I wish them all the best of luck, but could they at least spend some of that moulah on people who actually know what they’re doing? Having a free party in the Rainbow Room at the “W” is all very nice, I’d be lying if I pretended to say that I wouldn’t have liked to be there, but maybe somewhere along the line it would’ve been a good idea to spend $50 to get a college kid to check out if your new corporate name was already taken? If you’d done that, you wouldn’t have ended up with utter crap like this.

The way this looks, the entire venture capital pot may very well end up going to the actual owners of the OSM trademark, unless they turn out to be a lot nicer than they have to be.

That’s just incompetent.

I had a perfect example of this in school overseas. Some moron company decided to launch in my then home country and decided that hiring a professional who actually spoke the language to do the paperwork just wasn’t worth it.

They got taken to the cleaners and had to file for bankruptcy a few months later, all because of a minor translational error.

Anyway, back on topic: If only OSM would acknowledge that they effed up in their choice of name, I’m sure there wouldn’t be a problem. Stubbornly insisting that they’ve done nothing wrong when they’ve clearly made a mistake that would get a freshman econ student kicked out of class is not going to help. You fucked up, so what? We all do. Own up to it.

18 Responses to “Oh, For the Love of G-d, Would You Just Own Up To It?”
  1. Unregistered Comment by Darth Bacon UNITED STATES

    What the hell is OSM?!?

    mHeh…just kidding…it’s that government agency Oscar Goldman worked for on Six Million Dollar Man.

  2. Scott Comment by Scott UNITED STATES

    It looks like thay screwed the pooch on this one.
    So when is the relaunch date?

  3. Unregistered Comment by Y2Dray CANADA

    Just on my way to work…

    I never really latched on to the concept of OSM, let alone the concept of “Pajama Blogging”.

    If that were to mean providing the “alternative” to the MSM established train-of-thought, then all the power to them.

    But if that were to mean that independant blogging is about to be commercialised, homogenised and thrown into the mainstream, I’d be dead-set against it.

    I blog because it’s fun, lets me get stuff of my (greying) hairy chest and have a shot at notoriety, albeit for the “15 minutes” allotment.

    At least I got two out of three. The notoriey is yet to come. ;)

    Yankee Two Delta

  4. Unregistered Comment by rightwingprof UNITED STATES

    I’m naturally suspicous of hype, and all I can say is if the Emperor Misha is not a contributor, OSM can’t be much of anything. Then, I’m biased, and this is my favorite blog.

  5. Unregistered Comment by Deathknyte UNITED STATES

    That which becomes corperate can be corrupted to the whims of those with money.

  6. Unregistered Comment by purrfect_mamma UNITED STATES

    Seems to me that organizing bloggers is akin to herding cats. First, it’s very difficult and, second, even if you succeed, you’ve made the cats act like something other than cats. If that’s what you wanted, you should have gotten sheep in the first place.

  7. Unregistered Comment by TC@LeatherPenguin UNITED STATES

    I didn’t apply because I don’t much care for cliques and, just as importantly, because I feel that if you sign up for something, you have an obligation to contribute, and I have an in-built aversion against making promises that I’m not sure that I can keep.

    I thought this thing might be cool, but then I–Wall Street refugee who actually can explain the ‘net in on clear sentence—-looked at it as a business model. And I’ll be damned if someone can explain to me how they make money off ads, since everyone I know has their browsers configured to block the bastards.

    From what I’ve read, these “blessed” bloggers included in this enterprise are givng up, to the OSM “Editorial Board” what they can actually say, in addition to what ads they can run on their personal sites. Which is bullshit. OSM claims to be “Open Source,” so they can push the “new media” crap into the public weal. But their terms say no one can use their content.

    This enterprise is about MONEY, period. So they are just as fucked as what they purport to replace. I mean, jeez…the Rainbow Room? Thirty Rock? Shacking up their people at the “W”–one of the most overrated and overpriced hotels in Manhattan? Well, I guess they gotta do something with that $3.5 million dollar nut.

    Fuck these bastards.

  8. Unregistered Comment by RhiGirl UNITED STATES

    I don’t get OSM, either, but the bitching between the pro-OSM and anti-OSM folks is a bit much. Anybody been reading Ann Althouse’s blog lately? She now has a pro-OSM troll. Groupies…

  9. Unregistered Comment by GunnyBob UNITED STATES

    I also wish them well. Hell, I’d probably wish almost anyone good luck in going against the yellowstream, strike that, mainstream media, but am also trying to figure out what it’s all about. Sent them an email back when it seemed to be morphing from rumor to reality, and I understand that I’m nobody, just ask anybody, but no response was forthcoming and that’s usually a sign of you-gotta-be-a-member-to-be-a-member and as a lot of wise men have said, a club that would allow me to join isn’t one I’d wish to be a part of.

    Or something like that.

    And I couldn’t agree more about the name snafu. Own up to it and move on. Or run the risk of being what you claim to detest, namely the aloof and clueless mainstream.

  10. Unregistered Comment by MCPO Airdale UNITED STATES

    Went to the vaunted OSM site. It’s damn near unusable. I didn’t bookmark it.

  11. LC Wil Comment by LC Wil UNITED STATES

    Amazing.

    Looked at both site.

    If they are the new media, I’m buyin’ a newspaper.

    damn. Just . . . damn.

  12. Unregistered Comment by McTANK UNITED STATES

    I like new ideas, since they at least go to show ya someone is thinking.

    I like some of the bloggers involved in the OSM thing.

    I’m involved in an unrelated (and much less glamorous lol) field where a fairly similar situation took place. The old guard of officialdom ‘owned sole expertise’. Eventually a few serious folks realized it was BS and a “fractured-fractal” happened where the net became like the bangkok market stalls, most of which would rob you blind if not leave you bleeding, but a few of which were of course the real deal and a great find, and as a result of some of the more serious ‘free’ efforts on the part of interested public, a whole lot of people started getting their own education and more of an ‘attitude toward the old guard’ cropped up. Then the old guard, realizing they’d been sucker-punched by the next generation, and that not very many people were willing to come to the annual conventions where they paid themselves to stand around being The Experts anymore (and recruited their new audience/buyers), hit upon a plan. They founded an ‘international’ (read: USA only) association which was open to ‘everyone’ (read: nobody but their people will ever be in power), and which was intended to be a sort of merger between the old guard, and their new support for–and they were hoping, hence they’d get the support OF–a variety of the most popular alternative voices. It sort of almost worked. Mostly it spent a lot of money and people were official’d and title’d and in the end, aside from annual conventions and a newsletter, they didn’t do anything that wasn’t already being done anyway. The primary difference is, they were trying to control what was being done, by–well this is the long and short of it–sucking up to the “movers and shakers” who were doing it without them, and hoping that some money, some recognition, would buy them.

    Not saying this is the same thing. But I’ve since come to see that story as an ‘archetype’ because it happens all over the place. Sometimes, the old guard wins.

  13. Unregistered Comment by juandos UNITED STATES

    Hmmm, how bizzare is this coming from the French?
    Clearly, if authoritarian countries had control over their main domain names, their power would be reinforced. But the Internet can be used for propaganda as much as for protest. Democracy can only win ground when such a means of communication and expression develops. To suppose this is not just a pious hope. To entrust control of the Internet to a commonly accepted international body is just common sense. Except that in the real world, only Washington is currently capable of ensuring the security of the network.

  14. Unregistered Pingback by OSM Name Games: Blog Tips at ProBlogger UNITED STATES

    […] Plenty of others have waded into the debate of course (the PJ OSM have some pretty major league bloggers - so it’s a high profile project). You can look at some of the critiques of the name problem at Buzz Machine, Private Radio and Anit-Idiotarian Rottweiller. […]

  15. Unregistered Trackback by Open Source Media (aka Don Surber) UNITED STATES

    OSM=MSM — WTF?

    Last week’s launch of Open Source Media is the next logical step in capitalism: Consolidation. I tip my cap to Roger L. Simon’s ability to string together the 70 most popular political blogs is second only to his ability to get someone to front it $3…

  16. Unregistered Trackback by California Conservative UNITED STATES

    PajamaGate: OSM vs MSM — Will The Blogosphere Go Corporate?

    We’ve always wanted to use “gate” in something.
    This morning, Glenn “Instapundit” Reynolds cheerfully reports: GET IT RIGHT THE SECOND TIME: OSM is going back to “Pajamas Media.”
    “About time: I liked …

  17. Unregistered Trackback by Conservative Cat UNITED STATES

    The Whole OSM Thing

    Don Surber has a round-up of reactions to the Open Source Media project. Included is the story of the co-founder left behind in the dust, a possibly-unintended snub to a major player, and more than one post about the general…

  18. Unregistered Comment by Laurence Simon UNITED STATES

    Utter crap?

    Hey, now. Some of us are FULL of crap. ;)