Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2006/wp-includes/classes.php on line 581

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2006/wp-includes/classes.php on line 581

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2006/wp-includes/classes.php on line 581

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2006/wp-includes/classes.php on line 581

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_PageDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2006/wp-includes/classes.php on line 600

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2006/wp-includes/classes.php on line 699

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2006/wp-includes/classes.php on line 699

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2006/wp-includes/classes.php on line 699

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2006/wp-includes/classes.php on line 699

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_CategoryDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2006/wp-includes/classes.php on line 724

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class wpdb in /home/misha/public_html/2006/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 57

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/misha/public_html/2006/wp-includes/cache.php on line 404
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler » “Mon Dieu!”

We have to admit that we didn’t quite believe this one when LC Elchonon sent it to us. Not that we doubt Elchonon, but we just couldn’t suspend our disbelief enough to allow us to even think that the fwench pussies could say something like this (it checks out OK, though):

In a speech defending France’s costly nuclear deterrent and toughening policy against terrorism, President Jacques Chirac said Paris must be able to hit back hard at a hostile state’s centers of power and its “capacity to act”.

“The leaders of states who would use terrorist means against us, as well as those who would consider using in one way or another weapons of mass destruction, must understand that they would lay themselves open to a firm and adapted response on our part,” Chirac said during a visit to northwestern France, where France’s nuclear submarines are based.

“This response could be a conventional one. It could also be of a different kind.”

Chirac said all of France’s nuclear forces had been configured with this strategy in mind and the number of nuclear warheads on French nuclear submarines had been reduced to allow targeted strikes.

Holy Brie, Batman!

Of course, ChIRAQ could just be blustering (and he most likely is), but it’s about effin’ time that somebody got up on their hind legs and stated for the record that nukes aren’t worth a lot as deterrents unless you demonstrate a willingness to use them. Granted, saying that you will isn’t quite the same as doing it, but it’s still a damn sight more useful than the useless pansying around that we see from our own administration.

And it’s a fwenchman, of all people, who has finally decided to put his foot down?

This is extremely hard for us to type, but here goes: “Nicely put, Jacques.”

16 Responses to ““Mon Dieu!””
  1. Unregistered Comment by LC Roboto

    From the fwench, that’s a statement of war…
    and first

  2. Unregistered Comment by LC Roboto

    Watch out, Ahmadinnerjacket, your ankles aren’t safe with the fwenchies on the warpath

    “let slip the poodles of war”

  3. Unregistered Comment by LC Buckaroo UNITED STATES

    In an unrelated story, meteorologists are reporting unseasonably chilly temperatures in hell…

    Color me surprised. :what: First Germany signs on with Bush against the mad mullahcracy, and now France. Does this mean we will see action? Will the Democrats put their fingers to the wind and endorse strikes on Iran?

    This will be an interesting year…

  4. Blackiswhite Comment by Blackiswhite UNITED STATES

    Roboto-
    Laugh all you want. The meanest f’ing dog I ever knew was a full-size poodle.

    As fer the fwench talking head, unless or until I see some real actions to back up his verbal frothing, I’ll simply consider it a reminder to the Mullahs that they can be patient. After they complete their take-over of Fwance and the rest of EUnichstan, they’ll have a ready-made nuclear capability to make war. Have a nice day. :rant: :rant: :rant:

  5. Cheapshot911 Comment by Cheapshot911 UNITED STATES

    Given that the fwench press routinely refers to Dubya as a terr’, I gotta believe they’re really threatening us.

  6. LC Draco Comment by LC Draco

    President Jacques Chirac said Paris must be able to hit back hard at a hostile state’s centers of power and its “capacity to act”. emphasis mine

    That is so much crap, since MOST terrorist organizations today are non-state sponsored.

    I won’t believe it until I see mushroom clouds in the Iran. :mad:

  7. Unregistered Comment by LC Joseph Dromedary

    So the Fwench are going to go Postale with nukes on Iran. Yeah riiiiiggghhht …. and the 1971 Citroen is the most beautiful automobile ever designed. :whatever:

  8. Unregistered Comment by elchonon ISRAEL

    sweet dude! thanx for publishing it! I was doubting for a moment that you even read your mail! p.s. I have a new site my blog is now located under http://stateofjudea.com

  9. Unregistered Comment by Elephant Man UNITED STATES

    “This response could be a conventional one. It could also be of a different kind.”

    That doesn’t mean he’ll use nukes. He was most likely referring to France’s latest “sooper sekret” weapon to use against its enemies.

    Chirac said all of France’s nuclear forces had been configured with this strategy in mind and the number of nuclear warheads on French nuclear submarines had been reduced to allow targeted strikes.

    They had to make room for the new “Veiux Boulogne” missles…:lol:

  10. Unregistered Comment by Dicklist1 UNITED STATES

    I hope good old Jacques is prepared to nuke his own country. After all, there’s prolly more terrorists in France then there are Frenchmen.

    http://dicklist.blogspot.com

  11. Guido Cabrone Comment by Guido Cabrone UNITED STATES

    and the 1971 Citroen is the most beautiful automobile ever designed. :whatever:

    Hey, now, JD! I always thought the Citroen SM had a certain charm to it! (Not to mention being fast a hell, but what do you expect with a Maserati V6 under the hood?)

  12. Unregistered Comment by LC Roboto

    Sorry, BiW:
    “let slip the TOY poodles of war”

    Better?

  13. Alan K. Henderson Comment by Alan K. Henderson UNITED STATES

    Maybe next the Belgians will be threatening terrorists with their own weapons of mass destruction.

  14. Unregistered Comment by Emperor Palpatine

    I’ll believe it when I see it.

    At this point, maybe it’s let slip the chihuahuas of war: small irrtating little animals that make a lot of noise, but in the end can’t (or won’t) do shit.

  15. Unregistered Comment by LC Roboto

    How about one last one:

    Cry fatwa and let slip the frogs of war

    I swear that’s the last one…
    until the next one

  16. Blackiswhite Comment by Blackiswhite UNITED STATES

    Roboto-
    That should be enshrined in the Rott Hall of Quotable Quotes under the heading of FWANCE.
    :lol: :lol: :lol: