13
08
2006
Getting Rid of the Undesirables
Posted by: Emperor Misha I in Hezbollassholes, Middle East, Useless Swine1:25 pm
More exciting news about the depravity of the Hezbollassholes when it comes to manufacturing propaganda (with the MSM as eager, willing accomplices).
It’s a two-fer! They get their eugenics program rolling and create news of Israeli “atrocities”, and all they have to do is to shove a bunch of retarded kids into a military target!
Aren’t you all glad that Dubya and his State Dept. made sure that Hezbollah was saved from extinction?
Entries (RSS)
And this is surprising how?
I firmly believe that the islamic “religion”, and every country where it is dominant in the Middle East, is the modern day incarnation of German extermination camps…the contemporary Final Solution….and so many of the sheep who call themselves progressive or enlightened or diplomatic are just letting it happen.
If I was to redraw the map of the Middle East, it would look something like this:

Sieg Heil/Allahu Akhbar…..what’s the difference?
August 13th, 2006 at 1:59 pmCrap….link didn’t work, here it is again

August 13th, 2006 at 2:01 pmIsn’t that lovely? Even the handicapped now have the opportunity to die gloriously for the jihad. It’s the jihadi version of “death with dignity…”
*spit*
…And wasn’t there a story back during the Iraqi elections where Michael Moore’s Minutemen jihadi sonsofbitches kidnapped a Down’s syndrome kid, fitted him with a Semtex belt, and sent him into one of the polling places?
Again, Golda Meir was right: There can be no peace with Muslims until Muslims learn to love their children as much as we love ours.
August 13th, 2006 at 2:10 pmRespectfully, if Mrs. Meir seems to have overthought the situation. If she would have said “There can be no peace with Muslims.” that would have been more accurate.
August 13th, 2006 at 3:24 pmWhy, oh, why are we playing footsie with these cavemen?
Because our so-called “leaders” are a bunch of bed-wetting, insecure, cowardly peasants.
We need a leader. A REAL leader.
And if we don’t get one, we’re dead.
August 13th, 2006 at 3:35 pmThe only way we will get a real leader, or any real action out of the pansy ass weenies in our government will be to hit them where it hurts the most, their pocketbooks. And I’m not talking measly “we won’t vote for you crap”, I mean making sure they get no money for no performance. We need to strike the fear of poverty into the hearts of the assholes on “the hill” and force them to protect the people and not their own self interests if they wish to continue getting paid.
August 13th, 2006 at 3:41 pmUnfortunately, that’ll never happen, thanks to the left.
Allow me to elaborate a bit on the leader issue:
I’m reminded of LC Old Dog (if memory serves me correctly) who called in to the show last Thursday and raised a bunch of excellent points, among which was how you’d have to be pretty much insane to want to be President.
“Insane”, of course, might not be the right word, although I agree with the underlying point, but the literal meaning of the word might not serve to illustrate it correctly.
What we need in the situation we’re in right now, in order to fight the enemy we’re facing right now which will lead to an actual victory rather than merely a postponement of hostilities, is a leader with no regards to what history will say of him (here and in the following I use “him” because typing him/her all the time is just too bloody tedious. It’ might very well be a woman too. That’s not important), a leader who will, as Truman did, make the decision to do what needs to be done and then go to bed and get a good night’s sleep, knowing that there was no other way and damn the torpedoes of posterior 20/20 judgment from the safety of victory.
In other words, we need a leader whose sense of responsibility is to our nation, to the idea of freedom, to the concept of victory, and NOT in the least way to his personal “legacy.”
We need somebody who isn’t a narcissistic, cowardly fool who puts his own reputation above the needs of civilization. We need somebody who will, quite literally, sacrifice his soul and reputation on the altar of necessity, somebody who loves liberty more than himself.
We need somebody who values the lives of his children and everybody else’s children above empty accolades in history books, somebody who is capable of rising above the human need to be loved and, instead, risk losing it all in return for security and safety for generations to come.
That’s not to say that such a leader would lose all of that, after all Truman didn’t meet that fate in spite of his decision to do what had to be done, but he would have to face the risk of that happening and decide in favor of all of us.
Reagan had it. With the benefit of hindsight, we all know that his bluff was right on the money. We all know that his brinksmanship, putting the Soviet Union on the spot by forcing them to choose between inevitable bankruptcy in a hopeless arms race with the civilized world or going out with a last hurrah, was what led to the collapse of the Evil Empire, but nobody knew that back then. I know I didn’t because I was one of the ones on the front line wondering if this was the beginning of the end.
If he’d judged the situation wrong and triggered a world war, he’d be forever known as the one who turned the planet into a radioactive cinder.
Surely, he knew that too, but he nevertheless realized that somebody, somebody had to draw a line in the sand, and he decided that it might as well be him.
As a result, the Cold War ended in a victory for freedom and I and my friends, family and countrymen saw a threat that had been a fact of life since we were born disappear.
We need a leader with that kind of courage, that kind of uncompromising devotion to right as opposed to wrong, we need somebody selfless enough to risk it all and do what needs to be done and, if his actions are later deemed horrid, care not one whit about it.
Because it had to be done.
Sadly, we don’t have any of those. All that we have are a bunch of auto-fellating wimps desperate to earn a Nobel Peace Prize, morons willing to sacrifice all of humanity’s future on the altar of their own self-worship.
What we have is a bunch of narcissistic wimps, a load of cowards who would rather watch our children’s eyeballs melting and rolling down their cheeks than risk making an unpopular decision.
They’re worthless. They’re worse that worthless in that they’re dangerous to all of us.
May they forever burn in the Hell, the dominion on Earth of which they’ve helped establish through their cowardice and desire to polish their own knobs.
August 13th, 2006 at 4:02 pmRule by popularity polls is a bad way to rule. Look at the clinton years.
August 13th, 2006 at 5:06 pmAnybody here notice that douchebagboy scored a webpage?
http://www.ahmadinejad.ir/
I highly recommend you warmly welcome him to the net.
I already did.
August 13th, 2006 at 5:24 pmDeathknyte sez:
Yep, no moral compass there….but when over half of any news broadcast these days is nothing more than reporting on the “latest poll results”, well you see where the priority is. The all just want to be liked.
The Emperor put it well when he said:
Roger that Misha, internal and external polling pretty much drives ANY major decision today. I 100% believe that this is what drove the strategy of the Israeli government in this latest debacle, they grew timid in the face of negative world opinion. Hell, WE grow timid with ANY negative opinion from the latest CNN/Gallup poll….be it on kicking ass in Iraq or saying “screw you” to the environazis and working towards true energy independence…..
Here’s a historical what if for you:
If Roosevelt and the allies had relied on opinion polls, do you think that gas rationing, Lend/Lease, the draft, and day/night bombing of the reich would have happened?
They were all vastly unpopular, but the Allies saw the necessity of them for victory and did them regardless of what the public thought. To the so-called “progressives” that may seem like a totalitarian thing to do, but it ensured the continued existence of the freedom and liberty they claim to support today.
Imagine for a second, what would have happened if Truman conducted opinion polls on whether to drop the bomb or not. Think about how many of us would not be here today due to our fathers being killed in an invasion of Japan….all because the Gallup or Pew or Zogby of that time said “52% of those polled say no to using the bomb for offensive purposes”…..
Reagan, Churchill, Thatcher, Meir, Dayan, Lincoln….this world needs someone like you more than ever now….
August 13th, 2006 at 6:06 pmEmperor Misha,
The sense of the word as I used it is; So absorbed in the trappings of Power (Ego) that one forgets the responsibilities that go with the job. Ego-maniacal fixation is the proper usage but, a little difficult to get out properly after two drinks!
August 13th, 2006 at 8:07 pmDamn…nice to be back, seems I missed a bit. Jaybear…, one hell of a map, Brotha’. I hope you aren’t a good prophet, I fear you may be. I can’t get into Ahmadinejad’s site. Linkie no workie. What I feel is disgust, anger, almost a sense of resignation, people refusing to see what is happening…but being a survivalist type……And I have absolutely no compassion whatsoever for those using this for personal gain, be it left or right. All deserve a bullet and are worthy of comtempt. On a good day. Simply, quietly put…I am an American, a staunch supporter of Israel and the Jewish people……but how many people gotta’ big time sense of deja vu right about now? I can’t be the only one…….
August 13th, 2006 at 8:38 pmJaybear nails it:
Mobocracy by any other name. Problem is the mob is led around by the nose for nefarious purposes.
August 13th, 2006 at 9:43 pmI just translated the Lebanese post into English - an hour of thinking in frogspeak.
Where do I go to get some Coquilles St. Jacques and surrender to somebody?
August 13th, 2006 at 9:43 pmLebanese Website Accuses Hezbollah of Qana Atrocit…
Is it so hard to believe that the Islamofascists would do such a thing. Consider other acts that have been contributed to them. Not to mention their willingness to fly commercial airplanes into buildings with the hope of killing a maximum number of c…..
August 13th, 2006 at 11:54 pmTerrorist towel heads? Depraved?
Oh my yes if this story out of the U.K. is factual…
From the Sun: HATE-filled mums willing to sacrifice themselves and their BABIES are being hunted in the war on terror.
Security sources confirmed last night that alleged “baby bombers” were among those arrested over the plot to massacre thousands by downing transatlantic flights.
I’m not one who particularly likes the little crumb snatchers but this (agains assuming the article is factual) attempt to kill non-moose_limbs is just so far over the top I can’t even begin to think of how anyone could even want to think of the possibility of doing this…
August 14th, 2006 at 3:50 amIsnt the sun a tabloid, like Britans equivelent to the national enquirer?
August 14th, 2006 at 1:18 pmJaybear, you forgot old “Blood and Guts” Patton. God, how I pray for his reincarnation.
August 15th, 2006 at 11:52 am