Another Terrorist Who Definitely Isn’t a Terrorist
Posted by: Emperor Misha I in Homeland Insecurity, Idiotarians, Religion of Pus10:23 pm
This just in from Sir Christopher:
SAN FRANCISCO — As many as 14 people were injured this afternoon by a motorist who drove around San Francisco running them down before he was arrested, authorities said.
Seven of those injured were in critical condition, police and firefighters said.
Now just what kind of a person (and we’re using the term loosely here) would possibly use a vehicle as an instrument of mass murder?
Authorities have identified the man who was arrested as Omeed Aziz Popal, who has addresses in Ceres (Stanislaus County) and Fremont.
Omeed Aziz Popal?
Those damn Presbyterians! Or is that a Mormon name? We forget.
Authorities said they believe Popal was the same driver who ran over and killed a 55-year-old man walking in a bicycle lane in Fremont, at Fremont Boulevard near Ferry Lane, just after noon. That crash scene is just blocks from Popal’s Fremont address, where he had most recently been living.
Not to mention that, if you read the rest of the article, the vehicle that was used in the murder of the man in Fremont looked exactly like the vehicle that Omeed Aziz Popal was driving when he was apprehended. Great detective work there, which makes us wonder what’s up with this? (watch the whole thing, it’s quite interesting).
Note that Omeed was calmly, deliberately mowing down people. Note that his rampage took place, among other places, outside a Jewish Community Center. Note that the perpetrator, when apprehended, referred to himself as a terrorist.
Then note that the police immediately stated that, whatever else it might have been, it definitely wasn’t terrorism.
Which, of course, in today’s pissant, scared shitless of CAIR world, means that it was.
Or maybe it wasn’t. Anything’s possible, we suppose.
It’s just increasingly hard to believe a single word from law enforcement when they, whenever a member of the Religion of Piss commits an act of terrorism, immediately rule out terrorism.
Seems to His Majesty that one of the first things you should do when fighting a war is to call the enemy by its name. Even if their fifth column sympathizers in terrorist front organizations such as CAIR have conniptions.
But obviously the motto among those defending us has changed from “better dead than red” to “better dead than rude.”
Heaven help us. We’re being “led” by a bunch of nuns with a chronic case of the vapors.
Entries (RSS)
Hopefully the TSA doesn’t get wind of this. They’ll ban all vehicles from the highways!
(Of course, it’s like what Ron White said… “I got pulled over one night. Turns out they were pulling over everyone on that particular sidewalk…”)
(And could I actually be first?)
August 29th, 2006 at 11:02 pmUp to 14 hurt in SF hit-and-run spree (Updated and bumped)…
… I knew it all along. Just a harmless Afghani Quaker. …
August 29th, 2006 at 11:13 pmI don’t know if it’s the teachings or if it’s just genetic, I no longer care. If the “moderates” do not stop this crap from happening right now, a lot of non-terrorists are going to get their clocks cleaned and yes, it will be a so called hate crime (I hate people that are trying to kill me or mine).
If moslems are going to start mowing civilians down in the street with their vehicles, then any moslem behind the wheel is a potential terrorist and should be taken out.
August 29th, 2006 at 11:19 pmWell SoCal…I concur. And what better city for them to do it in? Maybe when these idiots start gettin’ their asses killed…but even then I sometimes wonder. I think of Dog Patch, my home, some hundred and fifty miles from Ess Eff……most of the people here own guns……..and very many would see very little. Nice thing about small towns…..”Nope, didn’t see jack shit. Dumb fuck ran out in front of a bullet. Very stupid and dangerous.” Sadly, it may very well come to that, and just watch the politicos scramble covering their collective asses. When it should be them taking these hits. One can only dream…….
August 29th, 2006 at 11:27 pmRog-o #3 & #4 Folks round here would say the basdard was killed by a tall short fat thin dark haired blond with blue brown eyes.
SF is a pretty soft target, agreed. Almost as soft as Seattle was. Anyone else see a trend?
August 30th, 2006 at 12:01 amIf IslamoNazis mow down enough of those idiots, do you really think it would change their mindset? Me neither. It’d just be one more thing to blame on Bush.
I’m not one to advocate mass prison camps, but I UNDERSTAND their appeal.
I’d rather just round these peopl up and send them back to their countries of origin. Let ‘em blow up or run down or behead their own people for a change.
August 30th, 2006 at 12:23 amIt would appear San Franciscians would rather be sodomized with a sagauro cactus than admit terrorism exists as that would support the administration.
Grits
August 30th, 2006 at 12:34 amNOT A CASE OF TERRORISM?!??!?!?!??!??!!
That reminds me of 9/11 here in SF ,when the police chief’s first concern after learning of the attacks, was to put all forces out to prevent hate crimes against muslims.
August 30th, 2006 at 12:35 amyou are NOT going to fucking believe THIS:
Omeed Aziz Popal, now in custody for a fatal hit and run rampage that apparently began in Fremont and ended in San Francisco, has a history of mental problems and lives in fear of the devil, some family members say. Other family members say he may have been anxious because of his recent marriage arranged by his family.
August 30th, 2006 at 12:53 amAugust 30th, 2006 at 12:54 am
The victims: ‘No pattern’ in targets of rampage
another link to a story where liberals realize that Instant Jihad can target ANYONE of any race, creed, color, or gender disposition… and they are shocked
August 30th, 2006 at 1:02 amI imagine that next week there will be cries to ban SUVs in the name of making children safer. Afterall, that’s what would happen if he had used a gun.
Ban SUVs! Do it for the children!
August 30th, 2006 at 3:08 amCouldn’t have been anything that he encounted in “marriage councling” could it?
With two weeks in Afganistan this normal everyday worker at an auto factory (who just happened to be…..muslim) decides to drive through the sidewalks of san francisco mowing down anyone he sees.
August 30th, 2006 at 3:51 amHis bride couldn’t have been that ugly, could she?
Referred to himself as a terrorist but police says it is ANYTHING but terrorism……………
August 30th, 2006 at 8:24 amI am so impressed with the dhimmis
Dex
Somebody needs to start keep track of all of these terrorist acts inside this country.
It’ll make it easier to justify killin’ the little bastards. Not that I really need any justifaction.
August 30th, 2006 at 8:35 amI dont think the Sanfrancisco police would admit that there was a terrorist act if someone blew up the golden gate bridge.
Unless it was a white guy.
August 30th, 2006 at 9:01 amJesus, what a bunch of hate-filled neanderthals you all are. And I’m sure you call yourself evangelical christians, or some such nonsense. Never mind that Jesus said nothing but love, love, love, and peace, peace, peace.
Now I’m sure you’re going to start quoting old testament “eye for an eye” garbage. Well guess what, mouth-breathers, Jesus came AFTER the old testament, and said peace, love, peace, love.
August 30th, 2006 at 9:28 amAnd by the way, that hit and run guy was having a psychotic break.
Does this mean I get to shoot every fat, stupid, bible zombie white guy that has a psychotic break?
August 30th, 2006 at 9:33 amThen said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. -Luke 22:36
And Jesus went into the temple of God, and cast out all them that sold and bought in the temple, and overthrew the tables of the moneychangers, and the seats of them that sold doves, -Matthew 21:12
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. -Matthew 10:34
Peace? I don’t think so, libtard. Forgive your enemies, but never fail to punish them.
August 30th, 2006 at 10:21 amliberalqueer:
Yes.
If some “bible zombie” has a psychotic break, and starts running down people in his car, shooting his sorry ass before he could hurt someone else would be an act of good citizenship.
August 30th, 2006 at 10:21 amAnd BTW, liberalqueer….
I am a conservative atheist.
I don’t car what your excuse is … Allah commands, jesus said, the voices in my head told me to do it ….
If you kill someone ofr reasons other than self-defense, your life should be forfeit. The relatives of the victims should not have to tolerate the further existence of the murderor.
August 30th, 2006 at 10:26 amWhat a riot! I found hundreds and hundreds of references to peace in the new testament, and you managed to cherry pick the few where jesus was having a temper tantrum and forgot his talking points for a moment.
If jesus were here now he would be having another temper tantrum, but this time at all of america, and our money-loving, resource-wasting, hate-filled ways.
Peace, I say! Read that fucking bible you love so much.
August 30th, 2006 at 10:35 amSo, liberalqueer … some madman, for whatever reason ( psychotic break, religion, whatever ), runs down people on the street with his car.
Someone puts a stop to it by shooting him.
Should the shooter be punished? If so, why?
August 30th, 2006 at 10:40 amOne other note … this was probably what liberals would call a “hate crime” if someone of northern european ancestry did it … the perp was driving in a large circle around one of the largest synagogues in S.F., the Temple Sherith Israel.
If some KKK member starts mowing down blacks in his pickup truck, tshould that klansmen be put to death?
Why is it suddenly OK if a moslem does the same thing around a synagogue?
August 30th, 2006 at 10:47 amAsked and answered. Jesus tasked Christians to forgive transgressions and protect their neighbors. Often, that means to use violence and remove a threat. Not all Christians have it in them to do that, preferring only to live and let live- but they are not fully living up to their duties.
I forgive you your transgressions against me, and I will defend you in your hour of need. That is my expression of Jesus’ teaching.
August 30th, 2006 at 10:54 ampeople still use Netscape?
August 30th, 2006 at 11:34 amThe hit and run guy, in my humble opionion, should have been stopped from doing what he was doing, including killing him if necessary. But once apprehended, he should be incarcerated so he cannot do it again. That’s what civilized people all over the planet do. Killing him later out of vengence is just barbaric.
So what is it thetay? Forgive or punish? Those are mutually exclusive.
August 30th, 2006 at 11:42 amWell - that would explain the burqa.
August 30th, 2006 at 11:51 amAnd while we’re at it, I’d like to fill in some gaps in the education of all you indiscriminate arab-haters.
9-11 happened because they were pissed off about 5000 american troops in Saudi, near their most sacred sites.
After 9-11 america pulled out all 5000 troops. Problem solved.
What would you do if 5000 Saudi troops were stationed in North Carolina, with the permission of a corrupt government, and against the will of 95% of the people?
Arabs couldn’t care less what we do over here. They just want us to get the fuck out of their goddamned business.
August 30th, 2006 at 12:08 pmOK then: a corrupt US government allowed the Saudis to station 5000 troops in South Carolina.
The proper response is to hang every US politician from a lamp-post … and then ask the Saudis exactly once to leave the country.
*****
We stationed 5000 troops in Saudi Arabia with the king’s permission. If this offended Saudi citizens, the proper response would be to revolt against or change the Saudi regime … and only attack the US troops if they get actively involved in stopping the revolution.
Killing 3000+ US citizens because a local government allowed the US to simply station troops there is barbaric behavior … those responsible, or those who aid those responsible require punishment.
August 30th, 2006 at 12:36 pmLiberalassmuncher,
August 30th, 2006 at 12:51 pmI don’t hate everbody, just you.
Feel better now ya douchebag?
Deranged Marriage
August 30th, 2006 at 12:52 pmOne comment on you, Go fuck yourself and learn a bit about is-lame before you wind up with your faggot ass swinging at the end of a rope, you DO know that’s what they do with queers in the lands of Mo-Ham-Id, don’t you? Now get the hell outta here and quit polluting my monitor with your garbage.
there ain’t no such critter as a “moderate moslem”, if they’re moderate thier apostates and liable for the death sentence.
August 30th, 2006 at 1:16 pma “moderate muslim” is one who takes the time to sharpen his knife before beheading infidels
August 30th, 2006 at 1:19 pmIf y’all want to learn a bit about the up and coming Anti-jihad movement Try the UAC We need to organize soon.
August 30th, 2006 at 1:19 pmfinally found a photo of the perp
August 30th, 2006 at 1:57 pmNope. Looks like a Methodist to me.
Nothing to see here folks. Move along…
August 30th, 2006 at 2:14 pmInteresting how this “Muslim criminals are really terrorists but the police don’t want to let us know” meme has gotten traction lately. Let’s follow the logic:
1. Muslims commit some crimes.
2. We know that these criminals are really terrorists because they’re Muslims. After all, it’s a well known fact that every Muslim is a terrorist just like Osama Bin Laden.
3. We can ignore any statements by law enforcement that the criminals have no known terrorist ties. The government just doesn’t want us to know!
4. We can also ignore any other reasons why the person may have committed the crime (greed, rage, mental illness, etc.). They’re Muslims, so they MUST be terrorists. We don’t need any direct evidence of involvement with terrorist organizations to know that!
It’s called guilt by association. Swap the name of another group for “Muslim” and another crime for “terrorism” and you can see how ludicrous this line of reasoning is and how can be used to make all kinds of wild accusations.
For example:
1. Joe robbed a bank, Frank deliberately ran over some people on the sidewalk, and Bill killed a guy. All of these men are members of the Mormon Church.
2. They must all be polygamists because it’s a well known fact that every Mormon is secretly a polygamist who wants to return to the good old days — look at Rulon Jeffs!
3. The Salt Lake City police have stated that polygamy wasn’t known to be a factor in these crimes. But they have an incentive to cover it up because they don’t want us to know how many polygamists there really are in Utah — the public will panic!
4. It turns out that Joe had a long existing criminal record, Frank was mentally ill, and Bill shot the guy during a fight. None of them were polygamists or had any ties to known polygamist groups. But that doesn’t mean they’re not polygamists!
Conservatives rightfully get pissed off at liberals who use this sort of “logic” to accuse evangelical Christians of various sins. Why they are doing it themselves escapes me.
August 30th, 2006 at 2:19 pmLiberalqueer:
I do hope you are a gay Arab.
August 30th, 2006 at 2:47 pmSo then Rosie … a moslem man of Pakistani origin drives around the outside of the largest Synagogue in the city, running down pedestrians, and it has nothing whatsoever to do with Islam or anti-semetism?
In my opinion, you are an idiotarian of the lowest order.
Or you are an islamo-fascist appologist and are lying your head off.
Pick one.
August 30th, 2006 at 2:48 pmSo over the last year or so, just how many times has terrorist towel head just decided to attack people who are minding their own business? Half a dozen? A dozen? More?
Misha must have several of the attack desciptions as topic postings on this site…
August 30th, 2006 at 2:51 pmWhy is it that people like this “liberalqueer” seem to think our aversion to being murdered by sociopathic muslims always comes from a biblical source?
Is is so hard to accept that I am not willing to be murdered in the name of someone else’s religion? Is is possible that I agree with the Old Testament, New Testament and Mohammed that human sacrifice is an unacceptable expression of religious faith?
WHy is it so hard to accept that, yes, I express my Christianity by rejecting the callous taking of life to make a shoddy political point?
“Greater love has no one than this, that he lay down his life for his friends” (John 15:14).
(Luke 22:36-38; cf. 2 Corinthians 11:26-27). Jesus tells his followers to sell their garments so they could buy swords to defend themselves.
Christianity teaches us that allowing evil is just as bad as committing the evil act yourself. Without, of course, getting into how Jesus upheld the word of God in the Old Testament-completely. Without reservation.
I am glad that you show even a nominal interest in Christian teachings, even if it is only a scholarly one. But you cannot take a few random quotes from the New Testament and try to mold other people’s outlook on life. Especially if your understanding of Christianity is incomplete.
Not to mention the part about how quoting religious text to strengthen your arguments about secular matters. That means that you lose the argument. Every time.
Bottom line is that you need to study the Bible better before accusing others of being Psuedo-Christians.
August 30th, 2006 at 3:47 pmThe easiest solution to all this is to remove Muslims from the country. A move I favor. If the Ess Eff pervert has a problem with that, send them all to San Francisco. Then provide said Muslims with ACLU lawyers and tell them happy hunting….no limit.
August 30th, 2006 at 4:14 pmAnd kill them if they try to cross a bridge or take 101 or 280 out of the city.
Geesh… The minute I saw this I thought it was spontaneous jihad. The guy’s family is from Afghanistan and he runs down people in a predominantly Jewish neighborhood. It’s a no-brainer - but according to the MSM retards it’s stress because of a pre-arranged marriage. And he was having nightmares about the devil coming after him - must have been Allah. Time for massive profiling and deportation - and while we’re at it, let’s make a glass factory in Tehran and N. Korea. You can’t trust the MSM to tell you the truth on anything any more and that goes for our esteemed government pretty much as well. America can’t seem to find her spine with two hands and a map these days… Terresa Monroe-Hamilton
August 30th, 2006 at 4:21 pm……and let’s not forget that in SanFranFreako you are forbidden to carry weapons concealed or otherwise. Think of all the problems that could have been solved if some citizen had put a 230gr JHP through this scum.
August 30th, 2006 at 4:23 pmAmen to that - more ammo… Terresa Monroe-Hamilton
August 30th, 2006 at 4:50 pmnot only that Basseteer, i live here and can tell you that the Cops are the FIRST to be investigated whenever something like that would happen. Kamalla Harris refused to seek the death penalty against a black guy who mercilessly gunned down a cop with an AK-47. It is a horrible place to be a cop, i’ve heard.
August 30th, 2006 at 4:58 pmAs per #27
You are incorrect. Forgiveness and justice are not mutually exclusive; merely hard to balance.
August 30th, 2006 at 5:18 pmForgiveness preserves the well-being of the individual, because it prevents the desire for vengance. Protecting your neighbor preserves society, because ideally, your neighbors will protect you also. Not all arguments can be solved with words; obviously, violence is the final arbiter, and must be employed judiciously and exactingly when it is applied.
So now we find out, the nutjob claims he is a terrorist but the cops and media are saying he isn’t… I tend to believe the terrorist. I am sick to death of having our news sanitized - how about the truth? That would be a nice change… Terresa Monroe-Hamilton
August 30th, 2006 at 6:12 pm“One witness said the suspect referred to himself as a terrorist”
This from the KTVU video clip.
Now, liberalqueer, are you a psychiatrist who has personally examined the suspect?
Or is he personally known to you?
Or are you basing your diagnosis on what was said to the press by relatives?
NEWSFLASH! Relatives lie. Quite often, in fact. Everyone out there knows some symptoms of a psychotic episode. Every relative of this individual is now going to say things like, “I can never see him doing such an act.” or “Omeed is not that kind of boy.” and “I don’t know what is wrong with him. He is the nicest boy.”, simply because they want people to feel sorry for him.
It’s a natural human reaction. Hard to blame the family members for it.
But, is it the truth? Or has our little friend Omeed been going to the mosque and listening to the mullah spout about “The Great Satan”, and “Killing the Kaffir”?
We won’t know for a long time, if ever.
Personally, I, myself, (despite a long association with the mental health field), feel that, if our boy Omeed WAS indeed having a psychotic break, he is still responsible for his actions. If I were to suddenly have strong urges to hack my neighbor to death with an axe because she mows her yard at 7:30 on a Saturday morning, and I both fail to get help AND act on these urges, I have no one to blame but myself.
The same is true with our muslim Omeed. If he was hearing voices in his head telling him to run over pedestrians, and failed to seek help for these urges, and then proceeded to act on them. It is HIS FUCKING FAULT!
Now, you may try to give me some bullshit about “cultural differences”, etc. Sorry pal. No sale. If he is religiously observant, and didn’t want to go to a psychiatrist or psychologist, he needed to go to the mullah of his mosque. If Islam is all about peace, (anyone who reads the Koran knows better, but…), then his spiritual adviser would get him some help.
None of the above happened, did it?
And then, immediately after this prolonged rampage, Omeed self identifies as a terrorist.
If I call myself one, after killing and maiming a number of people, well doncha think I AM one?
August 30th, 2006 at 6:50 pmSounds perfectly justified to me. I mean, damn, 7:30 on a Saturday?
August 30th, 2006 at 7:00 pmAugust 30th, 2006 at 7:07 pm
from same article as above. the latest from SFGate
August 30th, 2006 at 7:09 pmShe IS a college professor, they’re always a little whacked out…
August 30th, 2006 at 7:43 pm[…] How about this goat raping SUV driver who ran down a bunch of infidels in San Fransissy? As is their standard operating procedure, the media is trying really hard to avoid using the words “muslim,” “islam,” or “camel fellater” in their coverage of the infidel smasher. In an often-precedented turn-of-events, the towel-headed driver in question, Omeed Aziz Muhammed Muhammed Poopal, ended his rampage at - wait for it - a Jewish temple. Those damn Jews - always getting in the way of crazed muslims, when they’re just trying to exercise their religious civil rights. […]
August 30th, 2006 at 9:17 pmWell its a damn shame liberalqueer didn’t take the chance to be a human shield for Saddam when it was possible…
Yet I’m sure Mahmoud the Anal-Dinner-Job would appreciat his services…:lol:
August 31st, 2006 at 8:42 amSuspect Tricked Family
Man accused in hit-run rampage slipped away from relatives who were keeping an eye on him. Chronicle
HOLY CRAP, HERE IS THE ANSWER TO WHY HE WENT ON A RAMPAGE
August 31st, 2006 at 10:08 amAnd a good answer it is too.
No, I am not condoning his actions, but I understand why.
August 31st, 2006 at 10:15 amUGH! Chris! Chris! Chris!
While I’m sure Mrs. Popal is a lovely person that face could stop a clock!
Since Mr. Popal went to Afghanistan to get married I have to wonder while drinking the local water and eating the local food he contracted some sort of bacteria that settled into lower intestines…
So yeah, I can possibly buy the fact that Mr. Popal wasn’t a terrorist per se, just a desperate man, a very desperate man looking for a toilet…:lol:
August 31st, 2006 at 2:17 pmFirst of all, liberalqueer, I am not a Christian. I don’t have to turn the other cheek (obviously your definition of the word peace). I am a Jew. So don’t preach me to about “peace.”
Secondly, why don’t you go http://www.threligionofpeace.com. I DARE YOU, COWARD!!!
Thirdly, this columnist says it all:
The Minneapolis Star Tribune reports that two men are being sought in connection with an arson at a Minneapolis mosque — a crime that has attracted the attention of the FBI as a potential bias crime. Liberal City Council Member Gary Schiff arrived at the scene to pronounce: “There’s no doubt this was clearly a hate crime. It was a very deliberate offense.” Alan Silver, president of the Jewish Community Relations Council in Minneapolis, was also on hand to denounce the fire as “an attack on all of us.”
One of the men captured on surveillance cameras was white, sporting a full beard. The other was black, with a beard closely cropped around the jaw line. There are signs that gasoline was used to set the fire. On this evidence, the FBI, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and a number of community leaders in Minneapolis are certain a hate crime has been committed. Well, it’s possible, of course, but how many multi-racial anti-Muslim hate groups exist in the United States? Twenty to one they’ll discover it was just a plain old arson.
Meanwhile, in San Francisco, an immigrant from Afghanistan went on a rampage with his SUV, killing one man and wounding 18 others in hit-and-run attacks. Witnesses said he drove up onto curbs deliberately aiming at pedestrians. “Driver Called Unstable,” read the headline in the Washington Times. Yes, but according to the San Jose Mercury News, he was also a product of a certain culture. Omeed Popal was 29 years old, but apparently totally sheltered and controlled by his parents, who, according to the paper, “believed they needed to protect him from America’s ‘evil society.’” He had recently traveled to Afghanistan to be married to a woman his family picked out for him.
Perhaps there was nothing more to the story than mental instability and cultural rigidity bordering on the pathological. But the rampage ended at the Jewish Community Center of San Francisco, where two of the victims were struck. It also happens to echo a hit-and-run attack in North Carolina last spring. Iranian born Mohammed Reza Taheri-azar used a rented Jeep to plow into a crowd at the University of North Carolina. As Investor’s Business Daily reported, he told police that he ran down nine people with his SUV to “punish the government of the United States for its actions around the world.” He further explained to the judge that he was “thankful for the opportunity to spread the will of Allah.” No one has yet accused him of a hate crime, but news reports in that case as well stressed his mental instability. Students at UNC were deeply divided about whether the attack should be called terrorism.
When Naveed Haq invaded the Seattle Jewish Federation in Seattle last month and methodically shot six women, killing one, the coverage was quiet. The stories tended to focus on Haq’s (you guessed it) history of mental instability, and while officials did not hesitate to call it a hate crime, there was a good deal of reassurance about an “isolated act” and all that.
A few years before that, an Egyptian-born immigrant shot up the El Al ticket counter at Los Angeles International Airport. No significance, we were instructed. Isolated act.
“Beltway snipers” and Muslim converts John Allen Mohammed and Lee Malvo terrorized the Washington area for weeks when they went on a shooting spree. Their religious motivation (they admired the 9/11 hijackers) was soft-pedaled.
What is missing from the response to all of these attacks is some attention to the Muslim spirit of the day. Doubtless all of these criminals are mentally borderline types. But the environment in which they are nurtured affects their willingness to resort to violence as well as their choice of victims. In no case have Muslim leaders stepped forward to proclaim that an attack on a Jewish community center, for example, “is an attack on all of us.” Nor do they condemn the assaults as contrary to the tenets of Islam.
Mona Charen
Fourthly, as a Jew who has watched my people getting slaughtered by the Muslims (they’ve been doing it since the turn of the 20th century, read some history books, read about Hebron and Safed), and getting condemned for being victims and/or fighting back, I am SICK SICK SICK OF PEOPLE LIKE YOU. HOW DARE YOU TELL ME, A JEW, HOW TO FEEL AND HOW TO REACT!
Make sure to look up what Iran did to 9 homosesexuals a few months ago.
September 3rd, 2006 at 12:32 amAmen, readerjp, simply amen. Let these Muslim supporters and those excusing their actions reap the consequences of their support, rather than asking the rest of us. I cannot for the life of me understand how any woman or gay person anywhere can support or excuse the actions of these people. They would be the first mutilated or murdered. Perhaps that self-destructive trait the left is known for.
September 3rd, 2006 at 12:43 amSorry, Heaven helps no one, Sire. Only way anyone can help is to secure their gear and join in the helping of ourselves.
September 3rd, 2006 at 2:01 pm