13
09
2006
RINOs, al-Qaeda’s Best Friends
Posted by: Emperor Misha I in Idiotarians, Politics2:02 pm
Very preliminary, but Hot Air has a summary of some of the proposals that have come out of the President’s request for firm guidelines. A few highlights of what’s being proposed, but do read the whole thing:
- No electronic surveillance programs until after a terrorist attack. We the People will just have to take it up the pooper and then the Administration can start listening in on the terrorists that did it. The terrorists that are, by then, most likely dead.
- Terrorists that are tried will have full access to evidence used against them, classified or not. They can then, through their attorneys or in other ways, pass on this information to their al-Qaeda allies still at large. We’ll call this one the “Terrorist Access to Intel Fairness Doctrine.”
- There will be no use of coercion in interrogation of captured terrorists.
…and that’s what the so-called REPUBLICANS are suggesting.
Let’s just surrender and get it over with.
Entries (RSS)
Kinda just makes the case for “shoot the SOB’s and get it out of your system”, huh?
September 13th, 2006 at 2:19 pmOy! And reading through the comments there makes my head hurt.
Also makes Allahpundit’s condemnation of Ann Coulter’s Dizzy Dean immitation look even more stupid. And it already looked VERY stupid beforehand.
RH
September 13th, 2006 at 2:33 pmThis is what happens when you go to war without declaring war–president and military have their hands tied behind their backs. Either demand and get a declaration of war against AQ and all its supporters then proceed full force to annihilate the enemy or quit screwing around, getting our guys killed playing policeman in someone else’s sh–hole (we’ve got our own, you know–I’m in New Orleans, after all). This isn’t some game and it sure ain’t politics. It’s life and death for our soldiers and for our culture. If my reps aren’t going to do their jobs, I want them to make it clear, so I can figure on what to do next. Maybe they have, considering this development.
September 13th, 2006 at 2:48 pmHelluva way to fight a war! I caught this earlier this morning.
September 13th, 2006 at 4:33 pmRead on…….. What a GREAT idea!
Fun with the ACLU……
Wanna have some fun this CHRISTMAS? Send the ACLU a CHRISTMAS CARD this year.
As they are working so very hard to get rid of the CHRISTMAS part of this holiday, we should all send them a nice, CHRISTIAN card to brighten
up their dark, sad, little world.
Make sure it says “Merry Christmas” on it. Here’s the Address, just don’t be rude or crude. (It’s Not the Christian Way, you know!)
>>
>>
>>
>> ACLU
>> 125 Broad Street
>> 18th Floor New York, NY 10004
>>
>>Two tons of Christmas cards would freeze their operations because
they wouldn’t know if any were regular mail containing contributions. So
spend 39 cents and tell the ACLU to leave Christmas alone. Also tell them
that there is no such thing as a “Holiday Tree”. . . It’s a Christmas Tree
even in the fields!!
And pass this on to your email lists. We really want to communicate
September 13th, 2006 at 5:02 pmwith the ACLU! They really DESERVE us!!
Have they gone mad?
September 13th, 2006 at 6:11 pmThis BEGS to be repeated:
(1) No electronic surveillance programs until after a terrorist attack.
(2) Terrorists that are tried will have full access to evidence used against them, classified or not.
(3) There will be no use of coercion in interrogation of captured terrorists.
What is it about the waters of the Potomac that causes testicles to dry up and whither away? The feminists have won - there are no real men left alive, at least not in Washington DC.
September 13th, 2006 at 7:53 pmIt will take an American city going up in smoke. You could except the left to continue as they have now. I can only hope it takes out these gutless minions. That would be karmic justice. It would seem election fever has castrated the republicans at this point.
September 13th, 2006 at 8:09 pmI’m absofuckintively speechless!
September 13th, 2006 at 9:13 pmNot to be harsh or anything, but is there any chance we could pick Washington as that city?
September 14th, 2006 at 2:18 amMight not be that bad an idea. After all, both retardicans and demonrats get corrupted (or even worse) once they get there. Some say its the water, but I think its the staffers and the lobbyists. Wiping the whole pile of horse dung out in one fell swoop might actually be a good thing in the long run.
Be nice if there was another way of course, but I don’t see one.
RH
September 14th, 2006 at 2:37 amNo electronic surveillance until after an attack?
What, are we going to catch them bragging to their buddies?
September 14th, 2006 at 7:29 am[…] Apparently Bush putting the ball in Congress’ court isn’t going to work because the Republicans there are feverishly trying to score an own goal. One proposed bill by New Mexico’s Heather Graham would make it so we couldn’t conduct any more survelliance until we were attacked again. Posted by Ian S. in […]
September 14th, 2006 at 7:51 am“Ahkbar!” “Ahmed!” “JIIIIIIIHHHHHAAAAADDDDD!”
____________________
Sorry. This is a serious subject, but wild horses couldn’t have held that back.
September 14th, 2006 at 8:04 amThe craven cowards!
September 14th, 2006 at 12:54 pm