Few things can be more amusing than watching the former Adulterer-in-Chief blow his top over a journalist asking him the question that none of the fellating flapweasels of the MSM have previously dared ask him: “Why didn’t you do more to make Osama assume room temperature?”

Few things indeed, but one of them would be Kaiser Wilhelm von Blowjob coming up with all the wrong excuses, and Hot Air has a nice recap of it right here.

Every time that His Imperial Majesty thinks that it’s time for everybody to MoveOn.org and accept that there’s precious little point in dwelling on the fuckups and stupidity of the past, not much we can do to change it, after all, Slick Willy has to slip in his bent dick and force us to re-join the Blame Game.

Here’s a hint, you self-aggrandizing, lying, narcissistic dumbass: If you were to counter the tired old “you screwed up” with nothing more than “sure, but so did everybody else” and leave it at that, then even His Supreme Vindictiveness, Darth Misha I, would find precious little reason to flog that poor old hag again.

But you just can’t do that, can you? You can’t, not for a second, admit that you even share any of the blame. Oh no, it’s always somebody else’s fault, even if you have to rewrite history in your increasingly pathetic attempts to make it stick.

We mean, how can anybody possibly take a slackjawed, yokel, known liar and perjurer seriously when one of the first “defenses” out of his mouth is that those Evil Republicans were being critical of him “obsessing” over bin Laden? Our memory may be failing us here, but we don’t seem to recall anybody on our side of the aisle hassling the poor Bent Dick of Arkansas about being too vigorous in his pursuit of a clear and present danger to us.

Are there any of YOU out there remembering yourselves thinking “if only that bastard would quit spending his every waking hour trying to wipe out Osama bin Laden?”

Oh, and did you know that, according to the Liar of Little Rock, it was the conservatives that wanted to cut and run from Somalia whereas he, wanting to show the terrorists what-not, bravely refused to withdraw until the surrender documents could be properly signed? It didn’t impress Osama all that much, did it? Well, not if you’re to believe his own words anyway. Then again, how can somebody like Osama bin Laden possibly appreciate the courage in waiting for the UN to take over before ordering the troops to run away?

And did you know that Slick Willy actually, according to “I did not have sexual relations with that woman” himself, had a complete battle plan drawn up to take out Osama but that he couldn’t get the CIA and FBI to agree that Osama was a real threat so that he, the Commander-in-Chief, had to give it all up, based on the well-known “Constitutional Mandatory CIA Agreement” check on Executive Powers?

And, as if THAT wasn’t enough, the “entire military” was against using special forces to go in and take out Osama and, as we all know, if the military doesn’t unanimously approve of his actions, there’s really nothing that their Commander-in-Chief can do about it. It’s not like he’s their Commander-in-Chief, after all. Or something.

At any rate, read the transcript here, it’s truly amusing.

The imbecile’s accusations that Chris Wallace, by asking a question posed by a ton of viewers via email, was doing a “conservative hit job on behalf of FOX” is another one for the books. We damn near fell off our chair laughing.

Then again, we all know that asking any question is a “conservative hit job” if it might be seen as even being slightly critical of the Liberal Myth that History started on January 20th, 2001 and that nothing, absolutely NOTHING went before that.

He should’ve stuck to Krazy Keith Olbermann who, rumor has it, is still trying to get the stain off of his suit.

21 Responses to “Aww… Poor Slick Willy”
  1. LC Stargazer Comment by LC Stargazer UNITED STATES

    First! Yeah, Mr. Willy just can’t bear to give up his fifteen minutes of fame. Most of the time he seems to be maneuvering to try to make the Hildebeast look palatable to the voters, but this was just a bit over-the-top, wasn’t it? The pity is, he’s been a reasonably competent ex-Prez most of the time. If he’d just stop worrying about his ‘legacy’ maybe people would stop rubbing his nose in it.

  2. Unregistered Pingback by Lump on a Blog » Blog Archive » Cometh the Hour, Cometh the Man UNITED STATES

    […] Darth Misha I is just as harsh on what he calls the former Adulterer-in-Chief. ( Permanent Link) […]

  3. Unregistered Comment by RedSonjaHQ UNITED STATES

    I saw a photo today of some demonstrator with a billboard that SAYS IT ALL:

    “If Osama Had Been a Piece of Ass, Clinton Would Have Nailed Him.”

    Q.E.D.

    :devil_tb:

  4. LC Gunsniper Comment by LC Gunsniper UNITED STATES

    Boy, it’s a hoot watching Bubba get all indignant when his precious ego is in the crosshairs. He makes Muhammed Ali look like Yogi Berra.

  5. Cheapshot911 Comment by Cheapshot911 UNITED STATES

    As if,, the transition of power (and databases) were oh so smooth. NOT!

    All I heard was “..that woman..” over and over.

  6. LC Beaker Comment by LC Beaker UNITED STATES

    Slick Willie says…

    If you can criticize me for one thing, you can criticize me for this, after the Cole I had battle plans drawn to go into Afghanistan, overthrow the Taliban, and launch a full scale attack search for Bin Laden. But we needed baseing rights in Uzbekistan which we got after 9/11.

    Does anyone honestly think Bill Clinton had plans to go into Afghanistan? This has to be the biggest lie since his “this is the worst economy since the Great Depression” mantra he spewed in 1992 (passing over, of course, Jimmy Carter’s double-digit inflation AND unemployment years). Of course, the Lame-stream media gave him a total pass on that one back then, but things have changed.

    His ilk lost the control of information to the new media.

    As for his claim that the 9/11 comission was political, he is absolutely right. The Democrats packed the commission with enough Clinton flunkies in an attempt to whitewash any criticism of their former boss. Even after we were attacked, it was more important to protect Clinton’s “legacy” than it was to protect the country. Does Bush deserve some of the blame? Absolutely.

    But, after the attacks, Bush moved to change the way things were being done in an attempt to defend the nation. And, for those keeping score, most of that change was opposed by Democrats. The Patriot Act? Opposed by Donks. Wiretapping of calls coming from known al-Qaeda contacts? Opposed by Donks. Interrogation of hard-core al-Qaeda captives? Mostly opposed by Donks. Creating a program that works with other governments and financial institutions to uncover and hinder al-Qaeda’s funding? Killed by the propaganda wing of the DNC: The NY Times.

    But that’s not all. How about trying to establish a pro-Western, secular democracy in the heart of the Arab world? Opposed at every turn by the Democrats. Even worse, leaders in the Democratic party routinely call our troops “terrorists” or “murderers,” while professioning their “support” for them.

    As for Slick Willie, he’s got to be smart enough to see the writing on the wall. In 50 years, he is going to be worse than the American equivalent of Neville Chamberlain. Bill Clinton was a morally bankrupt politician who wanted to be president for the pomp and circumstance, and after getting it, accomplished absolutely nothing of merit while ignoring the threat over the horizon.

    And when you listen to him, you get the feeling he knows it too.

  7. THANOS Comment by THANOS UNITED STATES

    I watched the video clip of this interview over at hot air and i found it most amusing. The faked righteous anger was funny as sin. It was as if he was saying “How dare you question me?!?”

    Its the same ole same ole. Liberal shows can say anything and everything under the sun, even have guests on who feel that President Bush should be arrested and executed. Yet , dare to question a Liberal Democrat and oh man have you let loose a shit storm.

    Lovely double standards they Left has.

  8. Cheapshot911 Comment by Cheapshot911 UNITED STATES

    Yep, he’s goin’ on the warpath after downsizing, demoralizing and sellin’ off all kinda assets. (this from 1999)
    Whatta yardsale.

  9. Unregistered Comment by RedSonjaHQ UNITED STATES

    Dead on, LC Beaker, excellent comment! :clap_tb:

    Who can forget how Somalia offered Osama’s head on a silver platter, and the whore-hopping clown turned them down???

    And yes, Slick will indeed go down in history as someone worse than the American equivalent of Neville Chamberlain. Whatever Chamberlain’s other failings, he was at least a gentleman, not a low-life alley cat like Slick, whose nearest political equivalents are Mussolini, Juan Peron and Huey Long.

  10. sig94 Comment by sig94 UNITED STATES

    “If Osama Had Been a Piece of Ass, Clinton Would Have Nailed Him.”

    If Osama had been a piece of ass, Clinton woulda bent him ass up over the nose gear of Air Force One at high noon while it was parked in the runway at Dulles and afterwards made him the US Attorney General.

  11. LC HJ Caveman82952 Comment by LC HJ Caveman82952 UNITED STATES

    Testy, isn’t he? I haven’t forgotten the demos have done damn little but impede any attempts to nail these Muslim clowns. All in their pursuit of political power. I would fully expect them to oppose destroying them should a nuke land on American soil, preferring to blame Bush. Which remains why, along with the second amendment, I will never, under any circumstances, vote for them. It’s done for me.

  12. Unregistered Trackback by Right Truth UNITED STATES

    Bill Clinton wags his digit again…

    Former President William Jefferson Clinton is all over the television and internet today because of his spontaneous premeditated outburst while being interviewed by Chris Wallace. What struck me was how cool Chris Wallace was while Clinton jabbed that …

  13. p51driver Comment by p51driver UNITED STATES

    I ’bout fell out of my chair when he said he had battle plans drawn out for Afghanistan! And the comment about refueling helos! The Klinton administration spent more money and resources going after Bill Gates than OBL!
    Apparently he has never read Clarks book either.

  14. Lady Heather Comment by Lady Heather UNITED STATES

    He’s an absolute disgrace.

  15. LC Moriarty Comment by LC Moriarty UNITED STATES

    The interview had almost no impact on me. It merely added more weight to what I’ve known for a long time.

    And here’s everything you’ll ever need to know about William Jefferson Clinton.

  16. Unregistered Pingback by Plus + Ultra » Blog Archive » ClintonRage; Modeled After ToonRage, PopeRage UNITED STATES

    […] MORE on ClintonRage at: Michelle Malkin, Hot Air, Political Pit Bull, PoliPundit, Conservative Blog Therapy, Stuck on Stupid, Webloggin, Ace of Spades, Sister Toldjah, Flopping Aces, AIR […]

  17. SoCalOilMan Comment by SoCalOilMan UNITED STATES

    I wish I could link it, but I can’t, so believe me or not, but the gotdamn government lawyers where hipdeep in this too.

    There was discussion of whether the tape they were going to use to gag OBL would irritate his beard or not.

    I almost puked when I saw that.

    And clintoon’s orders to get OBL where written that (to paraphrase) he was to be captured, with guns..whatever the hell that means, besides “if something goes wrong it’s not my fault and you’re the ones screwed”.

    That rates right up there with take my lighter and see if there’s any gas in my tank while I go check this tree over here.

  18. juandos Comment by juandos UNITED STATES

    Funny how the Dope From Hope became quite steamed at being outted for the foreign policy fool that he was…

    Byron York’s, “Bill Clinton’s Excuses” notes some problems with Clinton’s comments…

    the former president based nearly his entire defense on one source: Against All Enemies: Inside America’s War on Terror, the book by former White House counterterrorism chief Richard Clarke. “All I’m asking is if anybody wants to say I didn’t do enough, you read Richard Clarke’s book,” Clinton said at one point in the interview. “All you have to do is read Richard Clarke’s book to look at what we did in a comprehensive systematic way to try to protect the country against terror,” he said at another. “All you have to do is read Richard Clarke’s findings and you know it’s not true,” he said at yet another point. In all, Clinton mentioned Clarke’s name 11 times during the Fox interview.

    But Clarke’s book does not, in fact, support Clinton’s claim. Judging by Clarke’s sympathetic account — as well as by the sympathetic accounts of other former Clinton aides like Daniel Benjamin and Steven Simon — it’s not quite accurate to say that Clinton tried to kill bin Laden. Rather, he tried to convince — as opposed to, say, order — U.S. military and intelligence agencies to kill bin Laden. And when, on a number of occasions, those agencies refused to act, Clinton, the commander-in-chief, gave up

  19. Unregistered Pingback by Inoperable Terran » Wow UNITED STATES

    […] Chris Wallace actaually asked Bill Clinton why he didn’t kill Osama when he had multiple chances. That boy’s gonna get drummed out of the MSM. Posted by Ian S. in […]

  20. Unregistered Comment by CKO1986 UNITED STATES

    Like I said at Sweetness & Light, somebody needs a rabies shot. And I’ll give you a hint: It’s not Chris Wallace.

  21. Unregistered Comment by kfx400 UNITED STATES

    “Lovely double standards they Left has.”

    Liberal philosophy: If standards are good, double standards are ever better.