Cartoon Rage II: This Time, it’s Ridiculous
Posted by: Emperor Misha I in Religion of Pus4:56 pm
Although I suppose you could say the same about the last time.
At any rage, I’m sure that you’re wondering why His Great Daneness hasn’t yet commented on the latest outburst of Islamonuttiness over drawings. It looks like the darling religion of “peace” is, once again, getting ready to burn embassies and kill people to show their cultural tolerance.
Once again, they’re trying to impose Shari’ah law on the public discourse of the West, demanding that we accept their dictates regarding what can and cannot be said about their beloved prophet of pederasty.
Tough titties, mullahs. Ain’t gonna happen. Well, at least not around these parts. It’d be a lie to suggest that nobody in the West are quite ready to cower under their desks, clearing every statement about Mohamhead (piss be upon him) with Mecca before publishing it. Case in point: Pretty much the entire media here in the “home of the brave.”
Yes, our great nation is still the home of the brave, but it looks like we let in entirely too much of the spineless, bedwetting rabble as well. That’s what happens when you don’t remember to lock the servants’ entrance, and let that be a lesson to us all.
Anyway, back to Cartoon Rage, the Sequel: What people consistently fail to remark upon when talking about this was that the drawings were being made at a private party, and if you’ve ever been to a private party in a Danish political party’s youth division (or any other Danish party involving youths, for that matter), then you’ll know that the lamest of them make our domestic “keggers” look like nap time in Sunday School.
I should know, because I attended quite a few of them during my youth, all across the political aisle. The conservative parties were, by far, the best ones, by the way. For one thing, everybody there bathed more than once a month.
Anyway, to get to the point, at those wild, PRIVATE parties there’d be shenanigans galore. Beer bongs, dick-painting, skinny dipping, swinging from the chandeliers, karaoke, Charades and assorted other events best enjoyed while three sheets to the wind on a lee shore, which is what everybody tended to be about half an hour into the proceedings. Having an impromptu cartoon drawing contest would certainly not have been out of the ordinary, if a bit lame by our raucous, hormone-imbalanced standards.
So obviously, at THIS particular event, the drunken teenagers were busy seeing who could draw the best and, going by personal experience, most silly, rude and sexually explicit Mohammed Cartoon. That’s what I’d have done anyway.
Then, event over, they’d probably have thrown out the drawings and gone on to more important things such as getting drunker and/or laid.
But not this time. This time some utter moron with a video camera was present, a moron who obviously decided later on that it would be cool to incite riots and violence by publishing this video of a private party.
That is the ONLY possible motivation for going public with the video, which makes the pimple-faced little troglodyte complicit in anything that may or may not happen as a result of his exhibitionism. Yep, you scummy little waste of sperm. If the perpetually outraged mooselimbs decide to murder another 139 people in response to your “scoop”, you’re as guilty as they are.
You bloody well KNEW what the reaction to the video would be, yet you chose to go public with it anyway. What’s worse, there was absolutely NO credible motivation for you to do so other than to stir up some shit. Private parties and the follies that take place there, unless they’re in violation of the law, are NOT newsworthy. Or perhaps YOU’D like to have every idiotic thing YOU’VE ever done while drunk and partying published?
I think not.
Stupid ass little prick.
**UPDATE**: I was going to address this in the comments, but it’s probably better to just add it to the post, so here goes:
It seems like I’ve somehow managed to give the impression that I’m excusing the goatfuckers and their utterly predictable and moronic, 7th century reaction to this by placing the blame on the twit that decided to go public with the video. I may have been unclear or I may have chosen the wrong words, it happens, so let me make myself clear:
I’m not. The ultimate blame for anything that the followers of the prophet of raping little girls choose to do is theirs. I’m not shifting the blame, I’m making it clear that the dimwit shares it. LC Maxxdog asked me if I was saying that it’s the same as crying fire in a theatre. It is and it isn’t. I would never blame the theatre crowd for panicking, but I DO blame the muzziefuckers for burning down embassies. But it IS the same in the sense that the little self-promoting toad knew what was going to happen, there was no point made by publishing other than to create riots, yet he did it anyway.
When the “Jyllands-Posten” originally posted Mohammed cartoons, it was to test a hypothesis, that mooselimbs would go crazy(er) if anybody dared draw their prophet. They had a point, and the point was made: Yes, the mooselimbs ARE insane and hypersensitive and yes, they WILL commit murder over anything they consider an “offense.”
We KNOW that now, so what was the bloody point in repeating the exercise when you KNOW the outcome and it doesn’t serve ANY purpose other than to stir up shit?
Does that mean that I’m against offending mooselimbs all of a sudden? Of course not.
Let me give you another example: I know that attending a Moonbat crapfest, or “protest” as they like to call it, will result in unpleasantness. Sooner or later, one of them is going to get in my face, knock my camera out of my hand or any number of other things. I know this because they’ve already proven it on too many other occasions to count. So do I stay away because I don’t believe that I have a right to oppose their views in public? Do I stay away because I’m afraid? Of COURSE not. Trust me, I fear them less than a hangnail and I know that the ones likely to get hurt the most would be them, courtesy of high-velocity lead injections if they got too frisky among other things. I stay away because I don’t believe in looking for trouble unless there’s a good point in doing so. Unlike lefties, for instance, who will happily show up at events featuring people they don’t like with the sole purpose of CREATING a mess. See: Columbia.
Also, and this is the important point here: This whole mess that is likely to ensue ISN’T because those Evil People of the Danish People’s Party are deliberately provoking peaceful mooselimbs. This wasn’t a party platform planning meeting, it was a private party with people goofing off like people are wont to do at private parties. It ONLY became a public mess because of that idiotic little moron choosing to make a name for himself by deliberately inciting riots.
And that is why he SHARES the blame.
It’s not that I oppose making fun of muslims, I’m used to being made fun of and it’s part of what we know as freedom of speech. Besides, I can sure dish it out, so I’m not at all averse to taking it as well. Occasionally my taunters even manage to teach me a new word or two.
But there’s something that everybody seems to be missing here:
Idiot Poster Boy ISN’T taunting mooselimbs, that would be ONE thing and, given their proven violent tendencies, might even be considered brave.
What HE’S doing is starting shit by saying “look at THEM. THEY’RE taunting you!”
He doesn’t even have the testicular fortitude to do it himself and thus, at the end of the day, he can sit back and enjoy the fireworks without having to take part in the festivities.
And THAT is why he’s a fucking coward and ought to be dragged outside and shot.
Entries (RSS)
One question and I’m not trying to be a prick, but what’s wrong with stirring the pot with these assholes and their fucked up religion?
October 8th, 2006 at 5:10 pmThe way you write and the way I write is virtually the same thing, isn’t it?
I know I’m missing something, but I don’t know what it is. Let me know, maybe I just misread something.
Personally, I think we should fire their asses up every chance we get.
The way I see it, if those who created the cartoons published them, it’s okay.
If you draw the cartoons and deliberately have them published, any attacks provoked are the result of your own actions. Morally, it’s fine because you accept the risk yourself.
If you publish the private cartoons of someone else without permission, and thereby agitate the muslims, your actions have provoked an attack against another, without putting yourself in harm’s way. That is cowardly and despicable.
October 8th, 2006 at 5:21 pmPublish anonymously or in public….it is time to get these assfuookin’ sons of MO-Ham-MED as agitated as possible and maybe their heads will finally explode.
They have no sense of humor so that need to be fooked every second by cartoons, Big-Mo in lingerie and eating pork and eating pork.
Any religion that hates dogs, blind people, women’s private parts in the condition that God made them, Jews, and a good single malt scotch needs chaotic and endless humor and derision sent in their direction.
George Guy does not get we are dealing with a subhuman religion of subhuman powermad 7th century hillbillies.
October 8th, 2006 at 5:33 pmWasn’t it ridiculous the first time?
October 8th, 2006 at 6:08 pmI’m with bigdicksplace and crapburner, Highness.
Anything that pisses off folks that think it’s a good thing to carve the clitoris out of your daughter or gut your niece like a fish for daring to speak to a male that she isn’t related to is a good thing.
Any bloodshed that results from this rests solely on the those who commit the atrocities. Blaming the videographer for folks killed when these assholes start rioting is like blaming a battered wife. Even if the videographer was posing as a member of the party was undercover, blame for the rioting falls squarely on the rioters.
If some evangelical Christain pretended to be a Kostard, infiltrated a few PAC meetings and filmed them saying mean things about “the fundies”, no one is going to riot. No heads lopped off and no burned embassies. And if there was violence ensuing from publication of this tape, it falls on the perpetrators and not the “undercover fundie”.
Quite frankly, I’m gobsmacked to see Misha dropping blame anywhere but exactly where it belongs-on those that perpetrate violence for violence sake.
Unless I’ve missed the mark, and you’re looking at this like the videographer has endangered the cartoonists.
October 8th, 2006 at 6:15 pmI like seeing the muzzies jacked up…now to get them pissed at the left here at home…………..as for their sensitivities, fuck ‘em! Let our lefty friends here at home change their lifestyles to accomodate them…let their women get their clits cut out……don’t tell me, show me! In the meantime I’ll be violating sharia law….somehow……
October 8th, 2006 at 6:21 pmMisha,
October 8th, 2006 at 6:37 pmAre you comparing the release of this video to someone yelling fire in a theater?
Misha wrote:
I don’t get this objection. It is patently obvious to anyone with eyes to see and enough functioning neurons to keep them open that the Islamic world is openly hostile to the concept of free speech. Moreover, the last cartoon scandal proved that there is no shortage of Islamists who would happily rob us of our freedoms to salve the tender feelings of their merciless God. I believe cartoons sacrelizing Mohammed should not only be endorsed wherever they may be found, their construction and publication should be mandatory until the so-called ‘Arab Street’ gets the message that, even in the secular West, there are certain things we hold sacrosanct.
As far as I can tell, there is no reason to believe those who drew these cartoons weren’t complicit in their subsequent publication, and if the Muzzies throw another conniption fit so be it.
Of course, publishing cartoons (or films of cartoons) of Mohammed carries no small amount of risk and you are right to point out that these kids probably weren’t considering the heavy responsibility that comes with doing so. It is my contention, however, that their lack of cognizance in this regard is irrelevant since I believe ’stirring up shit’ to be a perfectly valid reason to publish the cartoons.
I’m sick to the proverbial back teeth of the increasingly menacing overtures made towards my freedoms by savages who would burn the earth to cinders if it would put an end to heresy. Fuck ‘em, the horses they rode in on, and the goats they lie with.
On a related note, I’d like to take this opportunity to refer you to the awesome artwork of D.T. Devareaux. Whether you agree with him or not, you’ve gotta admit the dude can sure wield a paintbrush!
Enjoy!
October 8th, 2006 at 6:43 pmThankfully some of the Danes aren’t totally inhibited by their semi-socialist upbringing…
October 8th, 2006 at 6:55 pmOK, I was going to post a lengthy reply to your good points and even better questions, but I chose to update the post instead.
Trust me, I’m not in ANY way excusing the Islamotards or suggesting that we ought to treat them nicely and respectfully.
If I gave you that impression, then I didn’t express myself well enough, for which I’m sorry.
October 8th, 2006 at 7:22 pmDo you think they will get as tired Islamic rage as the rest of us. I mean being that pissed off all the time has got to be exhausting. I say we keep insulting them until they are just too worn out to riot.
October 8th, 2006 at 7:33 pm[…] The Emperor is getting a bit tired of it. Posted by Ian S. in […]
October 8th, 2006 at 7:42 pmOk, got it!
October 8th, 2006 at 7:45 pmI see the point and yes, understand that train of thought. Now the post makes more sense, but on the other hand, I fully believe we need to take it to them antime, anwhere, anyway possible. I’m not real big on letting up for an reason.
October 8th, 2006 at 7:45 pmJust my two cents.
Nor am I.
The best weapon against a moron trying to tell you what you can and cannot say is to ignore him and KEEP saying what he doesn’t like to hear.
They need to grow up and deal with free speech, or they need to be gone.
Permanently.
October 8th, 2006 at 7:56 pmYou’re right Muzzy, that is one hell of a set of cartoons, food for thought as well. That link will go to my friends. Thanks.
October 8th, 2006 at 8:08 pmhttp://www.cbn.com/CBNnews/36608.aspx
It’s not like anyone has to make shit up anyways!
October 8th, 2006 at 8:15 pmDahammm, Maxxdog, sensitive sorts, aren’t they? I remember getting dumped, didn’t start a riot over it either, just got shitfaced drunk that night.
October 8th, 2006 at 8:45 pmIt may not be as safe for the Saracens to go off like the last time. The lights are coming back on, and Europeans are starting to seethe right back.
October 8th, 2006 at 8:55 pmCan you say backlash? I knew you could.
I am so sick of hearing “It’s an insult to mohamboypig.” excuse. Rioting because a Christian woman told him “no”? Wonder if his fellow nutcases would have rioted so quick if he didn’t throw in the usual insult to the pedophile in chief excuse.
October 8th, 2006 at 9:48 pmYer missing the point Rotts !!!
:wallbash_tb:
October 8th, 2006 at 10:00 pmAha. Sorry I didn’t get that the first time around.
Peace, love and ammunition.
October 8th, 2006 at 10:15 pmScotty- that’s OK cuz you’re on the trail now….
October 8th, 2006 at 11:17 pm[…] The Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler has a different perspective here. […]
October 8th, 2006 at 11:28 pm“Their tasteless behavior in no way represents the way the Danish people or young Danish people view Muslims or Islam,” Rasmussen said.”
Danish PM Anders Fogh Rasmussen just made the mistake of his career.
October 9th, 2006 at 4:01 amI understand that, allegeldy, some sicko posted that video with malicious intent, knowing that some primitive whackjobs will throw a murderous hissy-fit over it, and possibly trying to provoke it. But what’s much, much sicker than the posting with such motives, is that there exist such primitive whackjobs whose hissy-fit was being provoked–not somewhere far away, but right the fuck in the middle of the by and large civilized world (while mooching off the said civilized world, in the process). Look… Videos, parties, what have you, do NOT, in and of themselves, incite riots and violence–as long as the participants do not initiate actual violence by, you know, committing it first (yeah, that one was for dumbasses–and libtard lawyers). Certain people decide to start violence and riots, after the fact. No matter what the perceived offence, the offended party has to CHOOSE to be offended badly enough to make it a problem. Then, it is a matter of what exactly are they going to DO about it.
Getting offended by something, just as enjoying something, is, ultimately, a value judgment. HOWEVER, and I am making sure it is clear before some n00b here accuses me of moral equivalence: NOT ALL VALUES ARE EQUAL. There are true, objective, fundamental values, such as individual life, liberty and pursuit of happiness (as long as it is not at someone else’s expense, extorted by force). At the same time, some so-called “values” are false, and are based on subjugation of some to others, by means of threats of physical injury or death, or on actual initiation of physical injury or death (see: fanatical psychosis, such as Islamofascism or communism, just to name a couple). These are, in fact, not values at all, but the very definition of evil.
So, a few European kids having a blast making fun of actual evil, while physically hurting NO ONE are not criminals, nor are they morally wrong. Taste is really irrelevant here, since taste is a strictly individual matter.
You want to see something meriting righteous violence? Just check out despicable, subhuman freaks stoning women for showing ankles, or the degenerates dressing their children in suicide bomber suits and actually breeding kids to turn into suicide bombers, or the ululating cannibals swarming exploded car bombs to scavenge for body parts, or dragging charred bodies of building contractors to hang them off bridges for all to see. THAT is the face of evil. THAT is what needs to be eradicated. Not some goofballs supposedly hurting someone’s “wiiiiddwe feeeeeewwiiiings” by drawing pictures or throwing a damn party. Were these kids raping, stoning, or murdering anyone? Fuck, no! So, (not) sorry if I have no sympathy for the 7th-century-vintage perma-seethers. These primitive fuckers are lucky they are still drawing enough oxygen to be able to seethe. Welcome to the free world bitches.
October 9th, 2006 at 5:12 amPardon the typos in my post above. I am fighting insomnia by means of wine, in the presence of two cats who insist on stomping on the keyboard. :drunk_tb:
October 9th, 2006 at 5:19 amI’m for stirring the “stuff muslims are made of” (hereafter, “smamo”(tm))at every available opportunity–the more they rant, the more pissed off everyone else gets at them and the more potential there is that some of their own people will see the absurdity of these imbicilic, violent responses to mere silliness. It’s not yet time to determine whether a guy who posts a video he was apparently permitted to make is a simpering coward, a mere jokester or a proponent of freedom–when/if the real smamo(tm) hits the fan, a whole lot of us, disproportionately young men, probably like the folks involved with the video, will get to prove ourselves, one way or the other.
October 9th, 2006 at 9:15 am