Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2006/wp-includes/classes.php on line 581

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2006/wp-includes/classes.php on line 581

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2006/wp-includes/classes.php on line 581

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2006/wp-includes/classes.php on line 581

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_PageDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2006/wp-includes/classes.php on line 600

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2006/wp-includes/classes.php on line 699

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2006/wp-includes/classes.php on line 699

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2006/wp-includes/classes.php on line 699

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2006/wp-includes/classes.php on line 699

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_CategoryDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2006/wp-includes/classes.php on line 724

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class wpdb in /home/misha/public_html/2006/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 57

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/misha/public_html/2006/wp-includes/cache.php on line 404
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler ยป Imperial Mail FAQ

Imperial Mail FAQ

I just realized that I didn’t have one and I’m shocked, SHOCKED, that we’ve managed to get by for so long without it, so here it is.

Everything you never wanted to know about Official Imperial Policy on Email Submissions:

Q: What kind of mail can I send you, O Emperor?
A: Anything you damn well please, and cut out the ‘O Emperor’ bit or this damn FAQ will get too damn long.

Q: ANYTHING?
A: Well, yes. With the exception of chain letters, Ponzi schemes (I’m already Master of the Universe, so I don’t NEED your stupid schemes), offers of penis enlargement, breast enlargement, free passwords to XXX sites etc. In other words, anything that qualifies as “spam”.

Q: What if I do so anyways?
A: You’ll find that my spamfilters are quite effective. If you persist you might also find out that the Imperial List of Stupid Mailing Lists Just Waiting For New Members™ is QUITE extensive, if you get my drift.

Q: I’d like to send you something, but I don’t want my identity published.
A: I don’t publish anything except for first names, to give credit where credit’s due, and only so if not told NOT to. If you don’t want even your first name published, please tell me so or provide me with a “handle” I can use instead. If you found it, you deserve a hat tip.

Q: Even if it’s hatemail?
A: Absolutely. If it’s threatening in a credible fashion, however, I WILL take appropriate steps to protect myself and my family. “If somebody says he’ll kill you, the safest thing to do is to assume that he means it”.

Q: That’s too vague, you scheming bastard. You’ll just claim that you found my brilliant insults “threatening.”
A: No. If you wish to insult me, go right ahead. They’re just words on a screen and won’t impact on my real life, so why on Earth would I want to mess with yours? Besides, if your insults really are brilliant, the worst thing that will happen to you is that I’ll try to come up with some of my own. OK, I might steal yours as well. Once again, I take your privacy VERY seriously and won’t compromise it unless you’re threatening, seriously, to commit a crime. Pissing on somebody’s parade and/or calling them the worst names in the book isn’t a crime. If it’s done well, it’s actually pretty impressive, if you ask me.

Q: Not even my email address?
A: ESPECIALLY not your email address. Not your IP either. Nor will I contact your employer or any such other nonsense. “Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.”

Q: I don’t believe you. I think you’ll share my email address with Ashcroft’s Elite Dissent Squashing Brigades™.
A: Go play with your tinfoil somewhere else, little one.

Q: What about property rights?
A: If you send it to me, It’ll mean that you have given me full rights to publish it, unless SPECIFICALLY AND CLEARLY stated otherwise ([NOT FOR PUBLICATION] or something like it will do nicely). If you have something you want me to know but don’t want published, just tell me and it’ll stay between the two of us. You have my word of honor. Yes, I do have one, and I take it very seriously.

Q: I wrote to you and you haven’t answered. What’s up with that?
A: First, it may be that I haven’t gotten to it yet. I value and appreciate everything you write to me and endeavor to answer every single mail. However, sometimes a mail might “slip through the cracks”. If that happens, I apologize and ask you to please mail me again, reminding me of the fact.

4 Responses to “Imperial Mail FAQ”
  1. Unregistered Pingback by Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler » Blog Archive » L’Affaire Schlussel… UNITED STATES

    […] For all of the years that I’ve been wasting everybody’s time with this blog, it has been my specific policy (as stated in my Imperial Mail FAQ) to never, ever publish stuff sent to me unless it met one of two criteria: […]

  2. Unregistered Comment by Infidel River Rat

    I’ve corresponded with Mike Gaynor since I’ve been here in A’-stan, and he’s posted a couple of my essays. They’re still on michnews.com, one posted on 28 Mar, the other on 3 Apr. They both deal with things that the mainstream mediamaggots have been censoring from their coverage. one is titled: “GI Joe Says:Laura Ingraham is RIGHT!” the other: “What GI Joe Says Is SO” I remembered them a few days ago, and thought they’d be something that the people that perouse this site would enjoy!

  3. Unregistered Comment by stanfil2 UNITED STATES

    Alright Sport how in the hell do I get to say what I want to say on this great website? Be kind I am not a geek, but a really, really disgruntled AMERICAN ( no hyphenation) citizen!

  4. SoCalOilMan Comment by SoCalOilMan UNITED STATES

    stanfil2

    Alright Sport how in the hell do I get to say what I want to say on this great website?

    It takes time to process your credentials and put your name into the RovianPolicalDatabase to make sure you are of a like mindset. We don’t allow anyone in here that could upset the hegemony of our right thinking people that lock into this site. Be patient, the Emperor, or one of his minions will approve you after the full background check required. I would have an answer for that time on 7/16 you visited http://www.*****.com (withheld so as not to influence the judges).