Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class wpdb in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 57

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/cache.php on line 384

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/classes.php on line 541

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/classes.php on line 541

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/classes.php on line 541

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/classes.php on line 541

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_PageDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/classes.php on line 560

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/classes.php on line 659

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/classes.php on line 659

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/classes.php on line 659

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/classes.php on line 659

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_CategoryDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/classes.php on line 684

Strict Standards: Non-static method sem_admin_menu::init() should not be called statically in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-content/plugins/sem-admin-menu/sem-admin-menu.php on line 358

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method sem_admin_menu::ob_add_menu() should not be called statically in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 164

Warning: ob_start(): non-static method sem_admin_menu::ob_add_menu_callback() should not be called statically in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-content/plugins/sem-admin-menu/sem-admin-menu.php on line 86

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method sem_admin_menu::kill_gzip() should not be called statically in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 59
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler » Archive for Verbal Bitch Slaps
Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method emotions::add_css() should not be called statically in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 164

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method emotions::add_js() should not be called statically in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 164
You are viewing the Archives for 2007.......If you want the current page, CLICK HERE.......

Archive for the “Verbal Bitch Slaps” Category

Our Imperial Ambassador to the British Isles, LC & IB Devil’s Kitchen, sets about proving that considering Tony Blair’s utter lack of testicles representative of Britain as a whole couldn’t possibly be farther from the truth.

He does so by, in his own inimitable style, delivering a painful verbal pimp-slapping to a bunch of jokesters running a campaign to collect reparations from Britain.

Now, His Imperial Rantiness thinks that the “britishreparations.org” site is a joke (in more than one sense of the word) but, considering the amount of stupidity prolific on the Internets, we can’t be sure that the twats aren’t serious.

Not that it matters. Joke or not, our British Devil’s slapdown is a thing to behold.

Oh, and before anybody starts getting the vapors over his vicissitude unleashed in our general direction, think about how you would feel if a bunch of Brits were to launch a similar website aimed at us.

Or, better still, just think about the utterly moronic mewlings that we can read on a daily basis on the BBC or The Independent (of Cerebral Functions) websites, and the rants that usually ensue on this site.

Comments 14 Comments »

We found this video (beneath the fold to decrease overall load times) at the Jawa Report, and we highly recommend watching it, in case you’ve ever found yourself wondering why on Earth liberals seem to be so disconnected from anything that might be considered logic.

And if you’re not going to take a NY Jooo and former liberal’s word for it, then who are you going to believe?

It’s quite long (47 minutes, to be exact), but if you go ahead and watch the first five minutes or so, we guarantee you that you’ll want to stick with it ’till the end.

Give us more, O Emperor! »

Comments 42 Comments »

Hat Tip to Sig94 for the linky love on this little gem:

Is There An Average Global Temperature?

I’ve tossed this general idea out a few times in past threads on the topic. My essential point being the physical impossibility of collecting and analyzing enough data to infer a conclusion that’s statistically significant on global scale temperatures. I aced my thermodynamics classes in “Uncle” Rickover’s Canoe Club College and dangit if I don’t remember a lot of what I was taught. Each and every model of a thermodynamic process must be “bounded” that is, the system to be analyzed must include a finite scientific “fence” around the process for any legitimate experimentation. This analysis technique isolates out (or otherwise assumes) external influences that if ignored, yield wild variances in the examined, theorized process results. The various laws of thermodynamics have been thoroughly proven, as it’s a relatively “older” scientific body of study. A block of ice placed in a room of a given (above freezing) temperature will melt at a rate determined by the room temperature, air flow and a number of other factors. Obviously, for this to work correctly, there must be no unaccounted for external factors affecting the study, e.g. the room temperature or airflow changes. With all conditions ’static’, the universal laws of thermodynamics work every time. The science in order to function, requires a fixed set of preconditions for theoretical measure of heat-transfer. The three processes by which heat transfers are conduction, convection and radiation. The science can of course, account for changes in the processes, but they must have a known magnitude and ‘appearance’ on the scene during the examined period.

As we’ll see without surprise, the global warming crowd cuts the corners a bit in their Modeling O’ Doom™, treating the atmosphere as a homogeneous mixture.

It is already painfully clear that models of anthropogenic global warming are ridiculously inadequate, and do not meet the basic tests of experimental science, no matter how many “scientists” yell “consensus.” Now comes a serious question from a serious scientist that threatens to undermine the fundamental premise of the alarmists. [emph mine, laughing]

Not only are the warmlings yelling foul, they’ve elevated the invective to a new low. Global Warming Deniers..mheh…I’ll wear that mantle with pride. Did you ever notice that when the butt-sniffin’ brotherhood of this crowd gets cornered, out comes a nice little Nazi referent? It’s almost as if they’ve revoked Godwin’s Law.

Give us more, O Emperor! »

Comments 37 Comments »

The Lady Ann rips into the obvious double standards when it comes to prosecuting crimes, alleged and real, depending on which party you belong to.

Short version: If you’re a Democrat, it’s impossible for you to be punished for breaking the law. If you’re Republican, you don’t even have to break it to end up looking at jail time.

Go read the whole thing.

(Note to hand-wringing Language Policemen of the “conservative” right: We’ve checked the entire article against our list of Words Liberals Don’t Like and Which Should Never Be Mentioned, Lest They Get Angry With Us™, and we assure you that you can read it all without worrying about having to write fifteen articles denouncing it tomorrow in order to “burnish your conservative bona fides.”)

Comments 146 Comments »

OK, we promise to try to quit writing about the PC, hand-wringing, political whores on the right flagellating themselves over Ann Coulter saying something that isn’t in the heretofore unpublished “Things You CAN Say Without Offending the New Moderate Right’s Feewings”, but these merciless slapdowns from the indispensable Cold Fury just have to be mentioned first:

LC & IB Mike’s take on it, followed by LC & IB Joe’s are so bloody brilliant that you’d hate yourselves to death for missing them.

Faggots.

Comments 28 Comments »

As you know, Nancy “al-Zawahiri’s Best Friend” Lugosi got her Depends in a knot when Vice President Cheney noted that her and Jack “Haji Lover” Murthafucker’s plans to stab the troops in the back by taking away their funding was playing straight into the hands of the enemies.

She, naturally, started whining like a stung sow, demanding retractions left, right and centre. For what? One can only wonder, since there was absolutely nothing factually incorrect about VP Cheney’s remarks. Unless, of course, one believes that al-Qaeda would hate for us to stop killing them.

Dick promptly told her to pound sand (link thanks to LC Michelle):

“If you’re going to advocate a course of action that basically is withdrawal of our forces from Iraq, then you don’t get to just do the fun part of that, that says, ‘We’ll, we’re going to get out,’ and appeal to your constituents on that basis,” Cheney said.

Dammit, Mr Vice President, you can’t possibly be insisting that the Traitorcrats be made to realize that their actions have real life consequences, can you?

The vice president had voiced the same criticism of Pelosi earlier this week during a visit to Japan, and the California Democrat accused the vice president of questioning her patriotism, saying she was going to call President Bush directly with her complaint.

“I hope the president will repudiate and distance himself from the vice president’s remarks,” Pelosi said. She ended up talking with White House chief of staff Josh Bolten instead of Bush.

Wahhhhhhhh… Somebody call the Wahhhmbulance, please. Running to daddy doesn’t work near as well when daddy is too busy clipping his toenails to answer your calls, does it? MUAHAHAHAHAHA!

During Friday’s interview in Sydney, Cheney said, “I’m not sure what part of it is that Nancy disagreed with. She accused me of questioning her patriotism. I didn’t question her patriotism. I questioned her judgment.”

Not much point in questioning her or any other member of the Dhimmicrats’ patriotism, seeing as how they haven’t the foggiest notion of what the word even means.

“You also have to be accountable for the results. What are the consequences of that? What happens if we withdraw from Iraq?,” he said. “And the point I made and I’ll make it again is that al-Qaida functions on the basis that they think they can break our will. That’s their fundamental underlying strategy, that if they can kill enough Americans or cause enough havoc, create enough chaos in Iraq, then we’ll quit and go home. And my statement was that if we adopt the Pelosi policy, that then we will validate the strategy of al-Qaida. I said it and I meant it.”

Asked if he was willing to take back his criticism of Pelosi, Cheney replied, “I’m not backing down.”

I always knew that Dick was the one in the Administration with the balls.

Comments 26 Comments »

Touching upon the case of former celebrity Jim Zumbo, who obviously, in spite of his vast knowledge of hunting and the implements used for that purpose, never quite understood the 2nd Amendment, the Imperial Educational Advisor is kind enough to spell the meaning of it out to him and morons like him.

Consider it your required reading for today.

Comments 8 Comments »

Ralph Peters kicks the terrorist sympathizing Donks square in the reproductive organs with this little doozy of an editorial (found at Conservative Grapevine, “Hunting Links So That You Won’t Have To”):

PROVIDING aid and comfort to the enemy in wartime is treason. It’s not “just politics.” It’s treason.

And signaling our enemies that Congress wants them to win isn’t “supporting our troops.”

The “nonbinding resolution” telling the world that we intend to surrender to terrorism and abandon Iraq may be the most disgraceful congressional action since the Democratic Party united to defend slavery.

Ouch.

Now go read the whole thing.

Comments 12 Comments »

If anybody is capable of delivering that, it would be LC & IB Russ Vaughn, Lifetime Friend of the Empire™:

Want to slam our soldiers, Arkin?
Well here is one to slam.
I got used to Lefty slamming
When I came back from Vietnam.
So you want to put a muzzle
On our brave fighting men?
Well try muzzling me you jerk,
Just tell me where and when.

Go read the rest of it. You really, REALLY want to.

Comments 9 Comments »

Once again, a group of bloviating retards with absolutely zero first hand knowledge of the subject matter wax poetic on the blessings and beauty of confiscatory taxes, nanny statism and welfare states.

The subject matter this time is the many “wonders” of the Danish welfare state and, as you might guess, we’d have quite a few things to say to the terminally cluefucked airheads at The New Republic, seeing as how we do have extensive experience in that particular area but, thanks to another expatriate Dane, we don’t have to. (hat tip to the Imperial Firearms Advisor for the link).

Go read it. ‘Tis a thing of beauty.

And to the illiberal imbeciles who wrote the original pigswill we have only this to say: If you’re so very convinced that the Danish 85% tax model is the answer to everybody’s problems, then why don’t you pack your bags and move over there?

Comments 25 Comments »