Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class wpdb in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 57

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/cache.php on line 384

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/classes.php on line 541

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/classes.php on line 541

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/classes.php on line 541

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/classes.php on line 541

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_PageDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/classes.php on line 560

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/classes.php on line 659

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/classes.php on line 659

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/classes.php on line 659

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/classes.php on line 659

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_CategoryDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/classes.php on line 684

Strict Standards: Non-static method sem_admin_menu::init() should not be called statically in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-content/plugins/sem-admin-menu/sem-admin-menu.php on line 358

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method sem_admin_menu::ob_add_menu() should not be called statically in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 164

Warning: ob_start(): non-static method sem_admin_menu::ob_add_menu_callback() should not be called statically in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-content/plugins/sem-admin-menu/sem-admin-menu.php on line 86

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method sem_admin_menu::kill_gzip() should not be called statically in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 59
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler » Archive for Lefty America-Haters
Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method emotions::add_css() should not be called statically in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 164

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method emotions::add_js() should not be called statically in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 164
You are viewing the Archives for 2007.......If you want the current page, CLICK HERE.......

Archive for the “Lefty America-Haters” Category

Clinton assails Bush’s ‘war on science’

Why yes, we did notice that RoveBushMcHitler are indeed carrying out a war on science, just last week my Imperial Correspondent’s spy network reported that the administration is working on a draft proposal to rescind gravity and lock-up those pesky Globull Worming Twoofers.

Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton cited frustrated scientists and a comedian Thursday as she assailed President Bush’s record on scientific study and pledged to rescind his restrictions on federal funding for embryonic stem cell research.

Didn’t we already settle this issue? If embryonic stem cell research had any possibility whatsoever of a significant medical breakthrough the private sector would have hundreds of millions invested in it. It doesn’t. Conclusion….it’s a dead-end for now.

The presidential candidate also said she would bar political appointees from altering or removing scientific conclusions from government research without a legitimate reason for doing so.

No indeedy, we can’t have people actually attempting to revise and/or correct poorly conducted, biased research. It’s much better to spend another umpteen million (or so) to do another study. Notably absent is what exactly constitutes government research? Papers published directly by a federal agency or funded by the government?

“The Bush administration has declared war on science,” the New York senator said. “When I am president, scientific integrity will not be the exception it will be the rule.”

Her address to the Carnegie Institution for Science was a preview of what she said would be more detailed proposals in coming weeks on energy and environmental issues.

Gee whiz and here I thought the Air Force has made some incredible breakthroughs in missile defense systems, the human genome project is making huge advances in medicine. Whoda thunk Noodlespine was making war on those scientific advances?

Give us more, O Emperor! »

Comments 45 Comments »

Talk about taking a knife to a gunfight. No, talk about taking a plastic spork to a fight against an entrenched Marine Corps Division WITH air and artillery support.

Dramatically escalating the Dems’ confrontation with Rush Limbaugh over his “phony soldiers” comment, Harry Reid just laced sharply into the talk show host in an extended attack on the Senate floor, hammering Rush’s comments as “unpatriotic” and demanding he apologize to the troops.

He then had to take a break while he tried to pick his lips back up off the floor. Really, that’s HARRY REID calling somebody “unpatriotic” and demanding that he “apologize to the troops.”


That’s like Adolf Hitler criticizing Mother Theresa for “intolerance.” Like Bill Klintoon accusing anybody of being promiscuous. Sweet merciful G-D this is funny!

The “lack of patriotism” smelly Harry is referring to is, in case you don’t know, when Rush called Jesse McBeth, Scott Beauchump et al “phony soldiers”, by the way. Apparently pointing out the obvious is about as unpatriotic as you can get in the liberal alternate universe.

Please, Rush, say it. I dare you. No, I BEG you, say the words: “How DARE you question my patriotism, Mr. Reid?”


And just what, exactly, are you trying to achieve, Harry, you ancient, wrinkled, treasonous, backstabbing, lying jerk? You’re not thinking that the troops are going to suddenly realize what an arch patriot you are and flock to your side? BWAHAHAHAHAHA! SNORT! GUFFAW!

Ouch. My sides are hurting.

P.S.: Forgot to mention that the grandstanding clown also left a letter condemning Rush for the various Senators to sign. Of course, that means that we of the Right Wing Death Beast Blogosphere have no other choice than to run around like chickens, screaming “the sky is falling, the Senate is threatening Rush’s free speech rights!”

Or we could just decide to set ourselves further apart from the nutroots by acting like adults. Yep, we think we’ll do that instead.

Comments 18 Comments »

So somebody decides to bitch slap for their disgusting “Betrayus” ad by mocking them mercilessly, and guess what?, that bastion of Free Speech, sends a cease & desist letter to CafePress, insisting that they remove the offending items and hand over personal contact info for the merchant.

Gee, that sounds like something Tits on a Chair™ would do.

So tell us again, weren’t huffing and puffing about their “First Amendment Rights” when defending their vile slander ad from the slings and arrows of outrage and disdain, claiming that they were being persecuted and having their rights threatened because people got mad at them and criticized them in public?

Obviously, to liberals, Free Speech Rights only apply when they happen to agree with the speech being expressed.

But we already knew that, didn’t we?

And no,, your precious copyright isn’t being “infringed” by somebody making fun of you. Tell your dumbass shyster lawyers to go back to school, will you? If the vendor were selling stuff as your stuff, now THAT would be copyright infringement.

But you’d have to be as dumb as a liberal to think that this:

…is in any shape, form or fashion “official merchandise.”

For one thing, it happens to make sense, you flaming hypocrites.

But hey, if that’s the game you want to play, let’s have some more:

Comments 20 Comments »

The Senate voted on an amendment expressing their support for GEN Petraeus and condemning sewer-dwelling bottom-feeders (that would be, to those of you who have spent the last decade on Neptune) slandering a highly decorated member of the Armed Forces, and the result of the vote was very… informative.

Please keep in mind that this is the same general who was confirmed unanimously by the same backstabbing lunatics voting against today’s amendment.

Also keep in mind that one of the 25 NAYs belongs to the Hildevermin, the beast from the darkest corners of Hell who wants to be Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces that she obviously has no problem with impugning the honor and integrity of at every turn.

No surprise, really, after all she already called GEN Petraeus a liar to his face, but certainly something that needs to be repeated again and again.

As to the other 24 NAYs?

We’ll remember you as well.

We’ll remember you very well indeed.

Comments 100 Comments »

So what do you do when your favorite Shamnesty gets shafted by We the People and your plan to import reliable voter cattle/cheap slave labor goes straight out the window?

Easy: You just try to sneak it in the back door, hoping that nobody will notice:

Less than three months after the amnesty bill was defeated, Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin of Illinois…

We’ll pause momentarily to get over the fits of laughter caused by the phrase “Whip Dick Durbin.” Not a bad suggestion, we might add. Of course, if you leave out the last name, you’ll get an entirely different message, no less hilarious, and we’re sure that that’s something that Dick Turban engages in on a regular basis.

OK, moving on…

…wants to revive one of its worst provisions: an amendment to the defense authorization bill that would constitute a massive financial windfall for millions of illegal aliens. The bill would essentially guarantee illegals a college education at much lower in-state rates.

If somebody figures out what cheap college tuition for criminals has to do with defense authorization, we’d like for you to share, because we can’t see a connection there.

Titled the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act, it was included in the immigration “compromise” that died in the Senate in June. It benefits illegals who entered this country before age 16. The bill should be shouted down.

Then beaten, cuffed, gagged and dragged outside and shot. And that goes for the bill as well.

“The illegal alien who applies for this amnesty is immediately rewarded with ‘conditional’ lawful permanent resident (green card) status, which can be converted to a non-conditional green card in short order,” Kris Kobach, a law professor at the University of Missouri-Kansas City, noted in a Heritage Foundation paper. “The alien can then use his newly acquired status to seek green cards for his parents who brought him in illegally in the first place. In this way, it is a backdoor amnesty for the millions of illegal aliens who brought their children to the United States.”

Brilliant, isn’t it? Amnesty, unlimited chain migration benefits for criminals AND cheap college education (paid for by YOU and YOUR children, you silly taxpayer you), all in one quick stroke of the pen.

But wait, wasn’t that EXACTLY what a vast majority of voters just got done telling Congress that we DON’T want?

Why yes, yes it was, but since when did the self-anointed royalty in the pestilent swamps of DC give a shit what YOU think?

We suggest it’s time for you to get on the horn and remind them. Forcefully. Repeatedly.

Remember: They’re your employees, and you’re in a position to fire their arses if you so please.

Damn thieves, liars and bribe-taking prostitutes. A pox on ALL of them.

Here’s a handy-dandy list of wafflers in DC who still haven’t got the message.

(And yes, it is worth it to call DemCong Senateweasels too. They’re getting nervous and realizing that this whole “full amnesty for serial lawbreakers” isn’t helping their party’s image none, so even if they’re too chicken to come out in the open and oppose it, some of them are likely to pull strings in the background to make it all go away. Besides, what’s the point of only contacting your Rep. or Senator if you already know that they’re going to agree with you?).

Comments 26 Comments »

Looks like we spoke too soon when we applauded the BBC for promptly removing what they said was an “old page” that was extremely offensive, because they’ve now put up a “new” version that they stand behind completely. A “new” version that, oddly enough, is exactly identical to the old one.

The way America has got involved in conflicts in regions like the Middle East has made some people very angry, including a group called al-Qaeda - who are widely thought to have been behind the attacks.
In the past, al-Qaeda leaders have declared a holy war - called a jihad - against the US. As part of this jihad, al-Qaeda members believe attacking US targets is something they should do.

When the attacks happened in 2001, there were a number of US troops in a country called Saudi Arabia, and the leader of al-Qaeda, Osama Bin Laden, said he wanted them to leave.

The usual yahoos and dimbulbs show up in Stop the ACLU’s comments, wailing and moaning that it’s “factually accurate”, so what’s so offensive about it?

Well, how to explain it to a lifeform with the IQ of a cup of soggy beef jerky? We know (thanks, commenter John Rohan), let’s rewrite the BBC’s “factually accurate” first sentence, shall we?

“The way the Jews had succeeded in business, finance and higher education had made some people very angry, including a party called “The National Socialist Workers’ Party of Germany” - who are widely thought to be behind the murder of 6 million Jews.”

Hey, it’s factually accurate, morons. So we suppose that it isn’t in the least offensive to you either, right?

The sad thing is that it probably isn’t.

Finally, remind us to never, ever again assume that the BBC is capable of any action indicative of basic morals, intelligence or journalistic ethics.

Comments 11 Comments »

We just read about the Cankled Hildebeest telling GEN Petraeus that believing his testimony requires “a willing suspension of disbelief.”

Now, we know full well that a large proportion of adults today were “educated” by the publik skool sistem and, as a result, have less of a grasp of the English language and the meaning of words than King Tut (and he had an excuse, since the language hadn’t been invented yet), but some of us are still quite capable of translating that artfully disguised slander to its Plain English meaning.

She is, in short, saying that GEN Petraeus is lying, and the fact that he was under oath at the time only makes the slander worse. Actionable, we’d say, if we happened to live in a country with an actual justice system, one that applied equally to politicians. But we don’t.

It doesn’t change the obvious fact that the Hildebeest is a lying, slanderous, filthy bitch who ought to have been taken to the vet ages ago, but we knew that already.

The only comfort lies in the sweet, sweet, miles-thick irony of a Clinton accusing anybody of lying.

Oh, Hildebeest: Those dirty funds you got from Hsu that you’re now sending back, not to return them but to let the donors re-launder them so you can have them back again, not to mention your recent hire of known felon, spy and traitor Sandy (Pants)burglar as a senior national security advisor…

How’s that all working out for you, you malodorous sow?

Thought nobody would notice, did you?

Comments 56 Comments »

You may be able to come up with a more convincing endorsement of the Hummer (no, the CAR, you naughty plebes!), but this whiny socialist fuckwad’s lament makes His Imperial Highness want to rush out and buy FOUR of them, even if he had to donate his kids’ kidneys to pay for it, which he most assuredly would (link thanks to LC Darth Bacon):

One struggles to think of a worse vehicle at a worse time. Introduced shortly after 9/11 — an event whose causes were tangled in America’s unquenchable thirst for oil

And he hits the Moonbat High “C” right off the bat, blaming 9/11, not on the terrorist swine murdering 3,000 Americans by using civilian airliners as cruise missiles, but on Us Evil Americans and our insistence on driving cars larger than the average snuff box.

Just in case you didn’t get it, the clownshoes of Time Magazine believe that you are to blame for 9/11 if you drive anything bigger than a VW Beetle. Keep that in mind when the time comes for renewing your subscription.

— the Hummer H2 sent all the wrong signals. It was/is arrogantly huge,

Not quite as “arrogantly huge” as one of the Gorebecile’s Gulfstreams, though, but let’s not talk about that.

overtly militaristic,

Major selling point right there, if you ask us. But we wouldn’t spring for an H2. Too crammed with civilian claptrap for our tastes. We’d go with an original purchased from an Army auction instead.

openly scornful of the common good.

You just can’t hope to get employed by the Marxist MSM if you don’t wail about the “common good” at least once a paragraph. The “common good” meaning, of course, whatever the self-anointed socialist elite have decided that is good for you, while meticulously avoiding placing any such restrictions on their hypocritical selves.

As a vehicle choice, the H2 was a spiteful reactionary riposte to notions that, you know, maybe we all shouldn’t be driving tanks that get 10 miles per gallon.

Beautiful way of shoving it in the face of patchouli-reeking, holier-than-thou snotweasels such as yourself too. And, as an added bonus, the inside of the H2’s cabin hardly trembles enough for your coffee to spill when you drive it over a Pious. What’s not to love?

Not surprisingly, the green-niks struck back. A Hummer dealership was torched in Southern California.

Right after blaming the deaths of 3,000 innocent Americans on people driving cars bigger than a roller skate, the Time hack proceeds to give a nod of approval to domestic terrorism.

Charming outfit, aren’t they? We suppose they won’t mind much if us “war-niks” “strike back” by locking the entire staff of Time inside corporate HQ and torch the building, then? We can bring marshmallows to offset the wasteful CO2 emissions made by the conflagration, if it will make your screaming deaths easier to endure.

The H2 was also a PR catastrophe for GM, who happened to be repossessing and crushing the few EV1 electric cars at the time. It all contributed to GM’s emerging image as the Dick Cheney of car companies.

And what a horror of PR nightmares it was too! The entire tofu-munching, unemployable, bicycle-riding hippie demographic GONE. OverNIGHT! Sales fucking plummeted!

Oh, and thanks for including the obligatory Dick Cheney reference, Time. If you hadn’t, we’d have had to give you a handful of demerits for messing up your catechism.


Comments 49 Comments »

(With my most profound and sincere apologies for the headline to all self-respecting gay men out there. Of all the ones of you I’ve known over the years, the most effeminate of you are still three orders of magnitude more manly than the studliest of the Dhimmicrats. But the word seems to rile the knuckle-dragging socialist troglodytes, so I just have to use it).

This just arrived in the Imperial Inbox from the Silky Pony campaign to emasculate America (now with compulsory, gun-to-your-head healthcare), all emphases theirs:

Dear Friend,

We’ve seen this movie before: Bush asks Congress for more money to keep the war in Iraq going, Congress hems and haws, then Congress caves—and a war the American people want to end rages on and on.

That’s Washington—you tell them what you want, they tell you why they can’t deliver. Well, enough is enough. We don’t need any more excuses from Washington—we need action and responsibility. Congress has the power to stop the war. It’s time for them to use it.

John Edwards has led the field of presidential candidates in calling on Congress to use the most powerful authority the Constitution gives them—funding power—to end the war in Iraq. It’s a no-brainer. Even Bush knows that if Congress ends funding for the war, the war has to end, and the troops come home.

In the next few weeks, Bush has to ask Congress for more money to continue his failed policy in Iraq. All Congress has to do is say no. The only question is, will Congress have the guts to stand up to Bush?

Of course, it’s awfully cheap for Silky Pony to send his? spokes-poodle out yipping and yapping and pissing on the rug about how the House has to do this, seeing as how it isn’t him? who will have to unbutton his lace shirt and commit political seppuku on live TV but, hate is as much as we do, (s)he? does have a point here.

Come on, Dhimmicrats. What happened to People Power? What happened to “when WE get control of Congress, things are going to change?” What happened to your lofty, principled opposition to the “unwinnable quagmire” in Iraq (that you voted in favor of, but let’s not quibble about details here)? Why, if you’re so convinced that it’s nothing but a needless, hopeless, senseless bloodbath and graveyard for our troops, and your statements every time you can find a microphone to hump certainly suggest as much, why do you insist on dragging it out while our troops are dying overseas?

You have the power. You can end the war tomorrow by, for once in your hypocritical, lying, two-faced, opportunist, calculating lives, putting your money where your yaps are and de-funding the whole kaboodle. You can’t continue to fight a war without funding, after all, and you can’t get funding unless Congress, that you control, approves it.

So what’s up with that, Dhimmicrats? Did you suddenly forget how you’ve reviled the war effort at every turn, only to let it go on indefinitely now that you have the power to end it?

Could it be that you’re — pussies?

Yep, we’re double dog daring you. It’s time to put up or shut up. It’s time to shit or get off the pot. It’s time for you to, for once in your utterly wasteful and needless lives, declare for one side or the other.

You can’t hide behind “but the meanie Republicans have control of Congress, so our hands are tied” anymore.

For fuck’s sakes, you can’t get anything done even when you have a majority in both houses, and you expect to be given the post of Commander-in-Chief as well?

Even on his most waffling, indecisive days, Dubya’s cuticles are a hundred times more decisive and commanding than you are.


Comments 29 Comments »

Just picked up this quote from LC & IB Dan Riehl:

Clinton said new tactics have brought some success against insurgents, particularly in Iraq’s Anbar province.

“It’s working. We’re just years too late in changing our tactics,” she said. “We can’t ever let that happen again. We can’t be fighting the last war. We have to keep preparing to fight the new war.”

Jumpin’ Jehosaphat on a Factory Tuned Pogo Stick, woman, how fucking dim can any single humanoid be?

You always “fight the last war” until you learn better. Put down your cattle futures and crack open a history book, you over-educated simpleton. The “last war” is all you have to go on when a new one starts, you rampaging rectal protuberance. What? You’re expecting divine inspiration, perhaps? The question isn’t about “fighting the last war” or not, it’s how long you keep “fighting the last war” after events begin to unfold and I will, reluctantly, grant you that the current administration hasn’t been overly impressive when it comes to thinking outside of the box. If those clowns had been in charge during WWII, we’d still be pondering whether invading Normandy would be a good idea in 1958.

But spare me the soundbites, please. I’ve forgotten more about military history than you’ll ever learn, so you’re not impressing anybody except for the morbidly ignorant.

Another blast of idiocy from the Hildebeest that I just can’t let pass:

Clinton said she wanted to restore America’s image abroad.

“People have to root for America,” she said. “They have to want to be on our side.”

Why, Hillary von Clausewitz? Granted, it would be awfully nice if everybody in the world stood up and cheered us on. It would also be nice if we had flying cars and the laws of physics could be repealed and altered as we see fit. Not to mention that I’d really like for money to grow on trees. But now that we’re done with the infantile wishful thinking that runs completely counter to every single record of history, could we please leave the perfect world and get back to Walgreen’s?

Whether the rest of the world like it or not is utterly immaterial. What matters is if it’s best for us, because we’re the only ones to whom we and, more specifically, the government of our nation has an obligation. I don’t really care whether the fwench would love to serially felch us all if doing so requires us to give up everything that makes us America. All I have to say to them and anybody feeling like they do is “you can either get on the train, step aside or get the fuck run over. I don’t give a flying flip.”

Dumb cow.

Comments 16 Comments »