Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class wpdb in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 57

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/cache.php on line 384

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/classes.php on line 541

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/classes.php on line 541

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/classes.php on line 541

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/classes.php on line 541

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_PageDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/classes.php on line 560

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/classes.php on line 659

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/classes.php on line 659

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/classes.php on line 659

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/classes.php on line 659

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_CategoryDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el($output) in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/classes.php on line 684

Strict Standards: Non-static method sem_admin_menu::init() should not be called statically in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-content/plugins/sem-admin-menu/sem-admin-menu.php on line 358

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method sem_admin_menu::ob_add_menu() should not be called statically in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 164

Warning: ob_start(): non-static method sem_admin_menu::ob_add_menu_callback() should not be called statically in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-content/plugins/sem-admin-menu/sem-admin-menu.php on line 86

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method sem_admin_menu::kill_gzip() should not be called statically in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 59
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler » Archive for Journaljizzm
Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method emotions::add_css() should not be called statically in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 164

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method emotions::add_js() should not be called statically in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 164
You are viewing the Archives for 2007.......If you want the current page, CLICK HERE.......

Archive for the “Journaljizzm” Category

The moral giants and impeccably credentialed journaljizzmers at The New People’s Stalinist Republic are now trolling threads, using the ID of the whistleblower they fired for telling the truth to get back at the meanies that exposed them for the pitiful, pathetic, douchebag liars that they are.

No wonder their circulation is down 40% since 2000.

It is, however, quite puzzling how they managed to find retards sufficiently daft to subscribe to the remaining 60%.

No, wait, it isn’t. People still voted for John Fuckface Kerry, after all.

Nicely played, shitheads.

So is Franklin Foerball going to comment on that, or is he too busy elevating the douchebag boning his editor to sainthood?

That was a rhetorical question, by the way.

UPDATE: Looks like Boochump’s entry fuck, Elspeth Reeve, may have to wait for a while before she has her bun stuffed again. From a previous entry on his old blog:

We finally got official dates on Iraq deployment: May 15 - Our Bradleys get shipped to Kuwaite June 11- Advanced Units move in June 28 - Bravo Team, second squad, first platoon, Alpha Company, first battalion, 18th brigade, first infantry division (the breakdown of who I belong to) deploys. Were probably going to sit in Kuwaite for some unknown amount of time, and then move into Baghdad…

Now, I don’t know how the kinder, gentler U.S. Army handles OPSEC violations like that, but I do know that if I had been publishing detailed deployment and roster information like that overseas, I’d still be rattling bars in a military prison today.

Oh, and for fuck’s sake, Boochamp: If you’re such an enormous intellect and probably the greatest poet alive today (as you like to think), could you at the very fucking least learn how to spell Kuwait correctly? It’s only got fucking two syllables, Mr. “Pity Fuck TNR Writer.”

Comments 58 Comments »

Just a stray thought on the whole The New People’s Socialist Republic kerfuffle:

Now that the lying liars at that thoroughly discredited rag have proven that they’re quite willing to fire an employee for the “crime” of telling the truth that they don’t want published, can we assume that The New Stalinist Republic won’t be using “unnamed government sources” anymore? Furthermore, if they insist on doing so in the future, can we expect them to not protect their sources’ identities, claiming that they’re doing so to protect the sources from repercussions?

No?

Why?

Because you’re a soggy paper bag full of rancid, hypocritical, two-faced shits?

Boochamp’s wife who got her paramour hired — still an editor.

Boochamp himself who, shall we say, seems to have certain trouble with refraining from “embellishing” the truth — still employed.

Franklin Foer, the chief cover-up artist failing to do any factchecking at all, violating each and every standard that journalists claim to follow, then backtracking, side-stepping, and speaking through both sides of his mouth to cover his own arse — still the boss at The New People’s Republic.

“Gracie”, the source that blew the lid on this whole affair and, alone among all of the individuals involved, told the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth — promptly shitcanned at 7.30 in the morning with a telephone call saying “your services are no longer required.”

Must be wonderful to live in a fantasy world where standards only apply to everybody else, n’est pas?

UPDATE: Douchebag Franklin Foer, still defending the indefensible (and still employed, unlike the only member of the organization capable of telling the truth):

The magazine’s editor, Franklin Foer, disclosed in an interview that Beauchamp is married to a New Republic staffer, and that is “part of the reason why we found him to be a credible writer.”

Finally, it is revealed how you get a job with the MSMidiots. Just be sure to stick your sausage in the right bun and you’ve got it made. Credentials? We don’t need no steenkin’ credentials!

Foer also said Beauchamp “has put himself in significant jeopardy” and “lost his lifeline to the rest of the world” because military officials have taken away his laptop, cellphone and e-mail privileges.

My heart fucking bleeds for the poor maligning, malingering, lying, buddy-fucking bastard caught all alone in Baghdad with NO INTERNET ACCESS! How the everloving fuck is he supposed to exist that way, stuck in the horrific conditions at his FOB without access to Malaysian Midget Pr0n while all of the guys that he stabbed in the back are outside the wire, having all the fun dodging IEDs and bullets?

Oh the fucking HUMANITY!!!1!!!11!

Foer, you’re a worthless, filthy, lying asshole, a terrorist aiding and abetting waste of skin and a backstabbing cockholster of the very first water.

And those are your good qualities. Go to the garage, get in your car, crank the engine and wait for a few hours. Do something worthwhile for once in your miserable, oxygen-thieving life.

As both the military and the magazine investigate Beauchamp’s allegations, a personal blog surfaced in which Beauchamp said last year that each morning he feels “retarded for joining the army,” “a little more liberal than the day before” and “a tool for global corporations.”

Gee. Wonder why Franklin Fuckhead couldn’t be bothered to check a single word sent to him by that douchebag? It’s a mystery, we tell you.

In a statement posted on the New Republic’s Web site, Beauchamp said his columns for the magazine, written under the name Scott Thomas, were “one soldier’s view of events in Iraq” and “never intended as a reflection of the entire U.S. military.”

Funny that you deliberately chose to only describe violations of the UCMJ committed by other soldiers then, don’t you think? No, you don’t think. That’s your problem, right there. That and the fact that your momma threw out the baby and raised the afterbirth instead.

“It’s been maddening, to say the least,” he added, “to see the plausibility of events that I witnessed questioned by people who have never served in Iraq.

All of those damn milbloggers at Blackfive et al who’ve never seen a second’s worth of service anywhere in the world, and certainly not in your elite, ninja MOS in the motor pool of FOB Falcon.

I was initially reluctant to take the time out of my already insane schedule fighting an actual war

Fighting a war with what? Monkey wrenches? Listen, maggot, we respect devotion and commitment, but don’t you think you’re taking it a bit too far?

in order to play some role in an ideological battle that I never wanted to join.

Er, right. That’s why you, on your personal blog, are endlessly yammering about your immense, progressive intellect and how you really only joined to gain the necessary street creds and “absolute moral majority” to yammer even more about the war. Nope, no ideological battle to be joined there, none at all.

That being said, my character, my experiences, and those of my comrades in arms have been called into question,

By yourself, asswipe.

and I believe that it is important to stand by my writing under my real name.”

Funny how you didn’t believe that until your name and unit had already been determined by others, isn’t it?

Foer said the magazine is attempting to confirm every detail. “We are trying to be as deliberate and meticulous as we possibly can,” he said. “We’re not going to be rushed into making any sort of snap judgment.”

Unless it’s a snap judgment about calling whistleblowers at 7.30 in the morning to inform them that they’re fired for telling the truth, that is.

You sickeningly hypocritical, self-serving jackass.

In his blog, called Sir Real Scott Thomas, Beauchamp quoted Vice President Cheney as explaining in 1991, when he was defense secretary, why the United States ended the Persian Gulf War without taking Baghdad. Beauchamp added that “we laugh harder at CSPAN than comedy central. Silly republicans.”

Nope, he definitely didn’t want to join any ideological battles. At least not the ones that he was certain to lose. But we already knew that he is a coward.

Beauchamp, who was based in Germany when the blog entries were posted in 2006, described his career this way: “I shoot, move, communicate, and kill . . . the deaths that I inflict secure the riches of the empire.”

Germany sure is one heck of a lot more interesting to serve in today than it was back during the Cold War. It’s almost as if he’s — I don’t know — making shit up out of whole cloth here, isn’t it? But hey, what would I know, a damn “chickenhawk” with a mere 14 years of service total.

As conservative bloggers yesterday continued to challenge the veracity of Beauchamp’s accounts, Foer said: “It is really unfortunate that someone like Scott, who was really only trying to tell his particular story, has become a pawn in the debate over the war and the Weekly Standard’s efforts to press an ideological agenda.”

Mr. Foer? I’ve got a Mr. Kettle on line 2 asking for you. Is your middle name really Pot?

Fuckhead.

Comments 20 Comments »

Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive.
And when we’ve practiced for a while, how vastly we fuck up our style.

So it looks like The New People’s Socialist Republic hired on Scott Beauchamp because he happened to be humping one of their editors and, helpfully enough, happened to be a card-carrying leftard who could be counted on to use his vast fantasy skills to produce just the kind of half-arsed, anti-war tripe on which TNR has built their house of cards.

You’d think that a moron publication like TNR, previously caught in the Stephen Glass scandal, would somehow realize that they weren’t exactly doing themselves any favors by becoming less credible than the Weekly World News, but you’d be wrong. Their response to being revealed, again, for the nepotistical, inbred liars that they are?

Let the whistleblower know, of course, that “your services are no longer needed.”

At least said whistleblower won’t be going down with that creaky garbage scow when it sinks.

Comments 31 Comments »

Yes, we know, it’s like putting up a headline saying “Sun Rises In East, Film At Eleven”, but it’s nevertheless necessary to put it out there before the Marxist rag manages to ensconce their lies firmly in the minds of the public.

Full story at LC & IB Blackfive who, unlike The New Peepul’s Republik, can actually be arsed to do some research on a subject.

Oh, and while we’re on the subject of The New Republic, we already knew what to think about that poor man’s version of Pravda when we first saw their covers many years ago, so it’s not like we’re surprised:

Now, this kind of imagery may not be all that familiar to most of you, so the particular style may not ring any bells, but His Imperial Majesty hasn’t seen propaganda art this primitive and boiler plate since he was studying Soviet agitprop as part of his government-sponsored, er, education back in the 80s.

Except the Soviets were better at it. Much better.

Comments 61 Comments »

It appears that the frenzied apes at the L.A. and New York Times — “All The Leftist Propaganda We See Fit To Print, From Sea To Shining Sea!” — actually have managed to find some billing records connecting Fred! to the National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association.

And it’s devastating, devastating, we tell you!

Over a mere 14 months, it turns out that Fred! consulted for them, something that lawyers are known to do from time to time, billing them for the astronomical sum of $5,000 (FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS!!!). That’s right! Fred! made literally HUNDREDS of dollars a month as a legal consultant for an organization at the request of a partner at his law firm. He even, the New York Times breathlessly reports, chatted with unspecified members of the Administration for a grand total of 3.3 HOURS, indubitably changing the entire Administration policy in the process, not to mention the Earth’s orbit around the Sun.

Because Fred! is JUST THAT AWESOME, don’t you know? For a mere $5,000 bucks and a after few lunches with unspecified people he can, in 14 months, completely redesign an entire plank in an Administration’s platform!

Fear The FRED!

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Really, somebody that has the hard-core socialist media clowns in that much of a frenzy to dig up some dirt, ANY dirt, HAS to be good for America.

Certainly good enough for me.

UPDATE: LC & IB Bill Quick isn’t impressed with the hilariously inept lefty agitprop either, and he raises another point with which I agree fully: If the moronic MSMidiots keep this up, Fred! may actually end up owing them a thank you note for helping to drive his numbers UP.

UPDATE the Second: I note that some on the right side are busy with the Fred! Lied, Social Cons Died! meme as well. Now, we could be snarky and say something about certain people not being comfortable with pro-abortion Rudy having Fred! running nose and nose with him, but let’s be serious for a moment, shall we?

The charge is that Fred! (or, rather, his spokesman) categorically denied that Fred! lobbied the Administration on the behalf of the NFPRHA, and now it shows that he actually did speak to Administration officials for 3.3 hours. Ergo, the argument goes, he lobbied which, of course, would mean that he lied.

Knowing full well that the response will be that I’m debating what the meaning of “is” is, I will still maintain that “to lobby” means “to exert actual influence” on somebody, at least it does to a lot of us. And the fact remains that nobody knows just who exactly he spoke to for those 3.3 hours and, more importantly, what he talked to them about. For all that we know, he could have been calling to ask them where they stood on issues near and dear to his clients, what legislation was coming up, when it was coming up etc. etc. etc. In other words, what’s normally referred to as “research.”

Now, I don’t know that that’s what happened, but are you trying to tell me that Fred! instructed his campaign to flat out lie about something that he knew could be documented? Come on, pull the other one. If that turns out to be the case, then you may have a point that he’s not suited for the post he seeks. Not because he worked for a piddling 20 hours for NFPRHA two decades ago over a period of 14 months, but because he’d be dumber than a brick wall.

But I guess we’ll find out about that, won’t we?

Comments 18 Comments »

HBO makes a fawning crockumentary about paleoswinian child murderers, and the New York Times are on their calloused knees, enjoying the golden showers and bukakke from the loins of allah’s assholes.

You know what? If the MSM would quit sucking the cocks of terrorists and pretending that deliberately, determinedly murdering children is no worse than fighting back, then perhaps I’d quit laughing my arse off every single time one of them is killed, murdered, raped, maimed or mutilated somewhere in the world.

But, as it is, I’m mercifully freed of the obligation to feel any sort of outrage whenever one of them is killed. If only my liver wasn’t hurting so bad because of all of the champagne I have to guzzle to mark the occasion.

What’s that? Another terrorist-loving “journalist” got killed again? Fuck, and I’m all out of sparkly.

Speaking of which:

Reporters Without Borders today called on both the US army and the Iraqi police to investigate the deaths of a photographer and a driver employed by Reuters in Baghdad because of the contradictory accounts about the circumstances. If the responsibilities are not clearly established, suspicions will persist about the US army’s involvement.

Oh dear. Did al-Roto-Reuters lose two of their terrorist-associated stringers? Gee, I sure hope that the car they were driving in wasn’t hurt too badly.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Shit, my head is so gonna hurt in the morning. Now where’d I put the Dom Perignon? I could’ve sworn I had a bottle left still.

Comments 48 Comments »

…it seems that our cousins in the MSM are still having a hard time putting all of the pieces together:

Though U.S. sources tell FOX News there has never been a fake tape from Bin Laden in the past, they contend that the analysis is not complete and there does not appear to be any time specific references so there is no way to know when the tape was made.

Oh but yes, yes there is:

“intelligence agencies have determined the video was previously aired as a portion of a longer show first on MBC TV (Middle East broadcast station) on April 17, 2002.”

You MSM “journalists” need better sources, obviously.

Or perhaps you just need to come to grips with your grief and admit to yourselves that Uncle Osama is, indeed, dead as a doornail.

Ferchrissakes, it’s been 5 years already! Don’t you have access to grief counselors?

Comments 20 Comments »

…and the resulting bilgewater disguised ineptly as thoughtful opinion can be found, of course, on the pages of the L.A. Slimes:

When the reality of Iraq hits home
Steve Lopez
July 15, 2007

My nephew is in boot camp.

One month into it, I’m still having trouble getting used to the sound of those words.

We know. You have every reason to be proud. Oh, wait, that’s not what you’re trying to say, is it? Of course it isn’t. If it were, your chances of being printed in the left coast version of Pravda would be small enough to force the scientific community to come up with a more accurate term than “infinitesimally small” to adequately describe it. Wait, we already have that term. “Zero.”

My brother and I tried to talk him out of it more than a year ago at a backyard gathering in the San Francisco Bay Area. It turned into a disastrous family argument that ended in tears, with my mother traumatized and my sister (the recruit’s mother) terrified.

If only he had confessed to something harmless. Such as being gay, joining al-Qaeda or talking his girlfriend into having an abortion. But joining the Corps??? Oh the HORROR!

Don’t become a pawn, I told my nephew,

Dude, the 60s are like, so totally over. But keep looking for them. You may find them one day and, if you’re really lucky, find the brains you left there as well.

for a president who misled us from the beginning and who will keep sacrificing lives in a vain and futile attempt to save face. The war in Iraq had been a reckless idea, I argued,

We somehow doubt that you did. You see, for somebody to “argue” something, something resembling an “argument” (Google it!) is generally required. We may be going out on a limb here, but simply stating “Iraq had been a reckless idea” doesn’t qualify.

and that was becoming clear even to many who once supported it.

What is becoming clear to many who once supported it is that, whereas the invasion was a splendid and much needed idea, the Commander-in-Chief and his spineless staff’s way of executing it leaves much to be desired. And when we say “much”, we mean “pretty much everything.”

Analogy: Eisenhower’s plan to invade Normandy and liberate Europe from Nazism was a splendid idea. Doing it by half measures and ordering the troops under pain of courts martial that they weren’t, under any circumstances, to do anything that might annoy the Nazis for fear that the “New York Times” might become cross with the president wouldn’t have been a brilliant way of executing it.

Fortunately for my ancestors and the rest of Europe, George “Waffle Iron” Bush wasn’t Commander-in-Chief back then.

I didn’t expect him to listen to me, though.

It’s good to see that you acknowledge your nephew’s superior intellect.

I haven’t been close enough to my nephew for him to heed my advice, and for that, I felt all the more helpless and guilty.

You mean: “I have failed in my duties to brainwash him into being a good little leftardian, for which I feel guilty.”

When my sister was diagnosed with cancer, my nephew delayed enlisting. But when she was finally in remission this past spring, he joined the Marines, and his letter to the family repeated some of what he’d said that day in my parents’ backyard.

“What I want for my life is to stand above the majority,” he wrote. “I believe in honor, discipline and courage…. I wish to be bigger than myself, to be a part of something more — something important and significant…. I hope that you will understand my reasons for this decision and will continue to support me.”

Don’t get your hopes set too high, Boot. After all, we all know what the leftards really mean when they say that they “support the troops”, don’t we?

But I’d like to take this opportunity to express my support and gratitude, son. You’re a fine young man, and with an admirable attitude like the one expressed in the above, I have every confidence that you’ll make a fine Marine when you finish boot camp.

Give us more, O Emperor! »

Comments 48 Comments »

Since the liberal MSM’s latest attempt to smear Fred! by claiming that he used to be a pro-abortion lobbyist (no point in trying to link, since the original L.A. Times smear has been post-edited so many times by now that it bears almost no resemblance to the original) misfired, the fighting nutroots are digging ever deeper to come up with something, anything that might possibly stick to a candidate that they obviously fear more than Milton Friedman himself.

So what’s up now? Well, clearly, Fred! is gay! Yep, he’s a bona fide faggotty cocksnorkler, at least if you’re to believe St Andrew of the Holy Heartache:

Outside the extremist, activist base, regular GOP voters turn out to be relatively tolerant when it comes to sexual minorities and private sex lives. They’re not well represented by their party leaders, as far as policy is concerned. This is good news for Fred Thompson. The man has had a colorful and wide-ranging sex life, as I’m sure we will soon find out. [Emphases ours — Emp. M.]


Andrew Sullivan, Senior Editor of “The Atlantic Monthly”, pondering his latest, thoughtful missive

(That would be the same “Atlantic Monthly” that fired Mark Steyn, by the way. Presumably because he wasn’t insane enough for the pages of that “classy” publication).

This ties in nicely with Glenn “Sock Puppet” Greenwald’s theory about conservatives and their sexual preferences, as LC & IB Ace notes:

Glenn Greenwald: I’ve written a fair amount recently about the media’s obsession with the faux-masculinity of GOP candidates in general, and the tough-guy military persona of Fred Thompson in particular, and don’t have all that much to add about that specific topic at the moment.

Those damned “faux-masculine” closeted conservative faggots.

Funny how gay smears are perfectly OK when they’re made by bona fide cock-milkers, isn’t it? Yet let Ann Coulter as much as think about using the “f”-word (the other one), and you have a perfect outrage storm.

But back to Andrew Sullivan, Senior Editor of the “classy, serious” publication, “The Atlantic Monthly.” We’re sure you’d all like to get to know him better, so here’s a little something about himself, in his own words, that LC & IB Ace dug up:

TOP VERSATILE BOTTOM [i.e., he’s both a top and bottom, he takes and gives]
I take loads in my ass.
I take loads in my mouth.
I give loads in asses.
I give loads in mouths.

I’m interested in bi scenes.

MY STATS
8 percent body-fat; squatting 8 plates; killer muscle ass that loves to milk loads with my power glutes;

Damn, those company Christmas parties at “The Atlantic Monthly” must be — interesting…

Comments 67 Comments »

The Dem Cong and their wholly owned subsidiaries in the press certainly are, digging up unsubstantiated ancient bull in a desperate attempt to smear a candidate that hasn’t even declared yet.

Today, the L.A. Times, the left coast equivalent of the New Duranty Times or Pravda on the Hudson, are claiming that Fred! was a hard-core pro-abortion lobbyist in 1991.

Oddly enough, the guy he was allegedly lobbying to within inches of his life, John Sununu, has no recollection of being strapped to a chair with a bright light in his face while Fred!, chomping on a huge Cuban cigar, attached electrical wires to his testicles, as a matter of fact he quite clearly recalls that no lobbying whatsoever was done.

Not to mention that Fred!’s actual voting record, something that can be actually documented, is staunchly pro-life.

So what are the L.A. DNC Daily basing their “scoop” on? Quotes from two Dem Cong operatives (who obviously wouldn’t be biased against a Republican Presidential candidate, potential or otherwise) and the undisclosed, alleged minutes of a pro-abortion group’s internal meeting.

That’s it. Nothing more than that. That’s all she wrote.

LC & IB Patterico has the details.

Am I outraged, dismayed and indignant at this blatantly obvious bias of the press?

Not at all. As a matter of fact, I find it highly encouraging. It means that the Dem Cong and their propaganda organs realize that Fred! is a serious threat to their bitch queen, the Hildebeest’s, dreams of once again infesting the White House with her and her husband’s particular brand of criminal, immoral, corrupt and downright offensive behavior.

Fred! in 2008!

Comments 24 Comments »