Strict Standards: Non-static method sem_admin_menu::init() should not be called statically in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-content/plugins/sem-admin-menu/sem-admin-menu.php on line 358

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method sem_admin_menu::ob_add_menu() should not be called statically in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 164

Warning: ob_start(): non-static method sem_admin_menu::ob_add_menu_callback() should not be called statically in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-content/plugins/sem-admin-menu/sem-admin-menu.php on line 86

Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method sem_admin_menu::kill_gzip() should not be called statically in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 59

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-content/plugins/sem-admin-menu/sem-admin-menu.php:358) in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 2
Comments on: “If Standards are Good, Double Standards, Logically, Must be TWICE as Good!” http://www.nicedoggie.net/2007/?p=446 Fri, 19 Jan 2018 21:06:32 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2 By: cmblake6 http://www.nicedoggie.net/2007/?p=446#comment-15412 cmblake6 Sun, 08 Apr 2007 21:17:33 +0000 http://www.nicedoggie.net/2007/?p=446#comment-15412 2112, my reason for wanting the compilation is to provide a segway into that reasoned conversation. They start driveling on about whichever thing "we" did, and we can come back with well-what-about. From there we can shift into wouldn't it work better if? Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method emotions::filter_text() should not be called statically in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/plugin.php on line 59

2112, my reason for wanting the compilation is to provide a segway into that reasoned conversation. They start driveling on about whichever thing “we” did, and we can come back with well-what-about. From there we can shift into wouldn’t it work better if?

]]>