RDF:![[Valid RSS]](valid-rss.png "Validate my RSS feed")
We haven’t watched the debate yet (and we probably won’t for quite some time, but that’s what DVR is for), but already the Ron Pauliacs have broken out fresh bags of Doritos, popped the cap of several gallons’ worth of Mountain Dew and are going through all of their open proxies to vote for their god as early and often as possible.
With predictably hilarious results.
And if you think that Mr. 2% consistently winning ever online poll, no matter what the question is, is funny, you should take a look into their mothers’ basements, where the widdle Paulites are frantically coordinating their spamming while expressing their outrage, OUTRAGE that nobody takes them seriously. Those comments are pure comedy GOLD, we tell you.
On October 10th, 2007 TVMH says:
They may have taken it down so as to run it again without prior influence after tonight’s re-broadcast.
Besides, look on the bright side.
If “they” have to resort to censorship, then that means Dr. Paul is very popular.
Further, they cannot avoid exposing themselves as propagandists when they resort to censorship.
People are not completely stupid, and I tend to think that they are starting to catch on to the shenanigans.
No, people aren’t. Just you and your friends. But let’s see if we get this right… If they take obviously spammed polls down, polls rendered completely worthless as information by you and your hamster voting over and over again for “Dr Paul”, then it means that he’s wildly popular? Conversely, if they leave the “98% think that Ron Paul is a Minor Deity” up, it means that he’s — wildly popular?
Right. Now quit wasting your mother’s electricity and put your helmet back on.
On October 10th, 2007 jons says:
CNBC took the poll down and never reported the results on the show. Did I miss the results? Am I going crazy?
That’s a rhetorical question, right?
RIGHT?
On October 10th, 2007 JUSTCOMEHOME says:
I voted in this one too. Dr Paul is at 48%
And you voted several times too, we’re sure. Well done, comrade. Your tireless clicking has all but assured that the Revolution™ is nigh! We salute you!
On October 10th, 2007 ironman77 says:
They ask who was best and who was worst - I screwed it up
…?
…!
*SNORT!*
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Ah, the technology… It is very COMPLICATED!
Listen, comrade, all you were asked to do was to click a few buttons and even THAT was beyond your meagre talents?
Ron Paul may be insane, but his acolytes seem to be just plain retarded.
And there’s more. LOTS more. Pure, distilled, industrial grade Stoopid™, served up with a delicious helping of unintentional hilarity.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
Entries (RSS)
Minor deity? I think you’re being way too liberal with terms here. More like 98% think RonPaul (kinda like RuePaul, don’t you think?) is a raving hippie moonbat loser.
Or is it only me?
Oh, and after all this time, I finally get to say this…
FOIST!
October 9th, 2007 at 7:53 PMUsing
Can’t say for sure, of course. All I know is that any online poll in which Ron Paul’s name appears will, inevitably, end up with him being named the winner/leader/best thing ever/new Beatles.
And it doesn’t matter one whit what the actual question is.
Then again, I never cared too much for online polls, so perhaps they’re actually doing me a favor here by utterly discrediting them.
October 9th, 2007 at 7:56 PMUsing
Does Mommy know you have her credit card?? Or are you spending all of your allowance?
October 9th, 2007 at 8:12 PMUsing
$25????!!!!!
Let’s hope he doesn’t have any 12-year-old kids, or we’ll be seeing his offspring in the next DNC propaganda ad, complaining that the Evil Right Wingers won’t pay for daddy’s mortgage.
October 9th, 2007 at 8:19 PMUsing
468 Comments on that thread.
In THREE HOURS? Whiskey, Tango Foxtrot, over?
“Paulbots to the rescue! One for All, and All for Paul!”
===================
I say again, it would be easy to cure that crap. Just lock in the display to
“Ron Paul - - 1 vote.”
===================
“In the land of the blind, RonPaul would blind himself.”
“Give me Liberty, or give me RonPaul!”
“A car in every Garage, and a RonPaul in every Pot!”
“Tipacanoo, and RonPaul, too!”
==========================
Tell me, seriously, this stupid fuck is a joke, right? No, no, I mean a JOKE, put up by CNBC, Chris Matthews and Olberman to raise their ratings up to something that registers, right? Comeon, single cell organisms are not THIS fucking stupid. I have doubts that Ron Paul could find his ass with a flashlight and GPS.
These PaulBots are three lonely nerds taking a break between online porn and looking for love in all the wrong places, right?
October 9th, 2007 at 8:21 PMUsing
They’re everywhere in Chicago.
I found a few signs around here, and even one big banner near a construction site.
It’s time for a few Fred! ones to go up.
October 9th, 2007 at 9:42 PMUsing
lots of Ron Paul signs here in King County Washington……no signs for any other GOP candidate….
October 9th, 2007 at 9:57 PMUsing
Political positions of Ron Paul - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If this is accurate, I don’t think many people would have a problem voting for Paul. Unfortunately, his position on the War on Islamofascism is not very practical - not that President RINO W. Bush’s “Democratize eighth century barbarians who like being ignorant savages just fine, thanks” is all that much better.
And then, of course, the fact that burbling loons and raving wankjobs of every description seem to love him sort of brings back what your mother used to tell you: Be careful, because you’ll be known by the friends you keep.
October 9th, 2007 at 10:09 PMUsing
Anyone see the debate? Paul came within a red c-hair of exposing his Truther™ beliefs. He claimed America has never been attacked in her 231 year history!
Followed by the shreiking orgasmic delight of the Paul-pots infesting the auditorium.
The looks the others gave him throughout were priceless. The uber-contempt look of a teacher to the class ‘tard.
October 9th, 2007 at 10:11 PMUsing
What’s weird here is I haven’t seen a single Ron Paul sign yet. Makes me wonder sometimes. But America never being attacked? S’cuze me……I gotta’ bail on that remark…try selling that to my dad, Mr. Paul…..just try.
October 9th, 2007 at 10:19 PMUsing
CAVEMAN
October 9th, 2007 at 10:33 PMI’ve seen 1 Ron Paul bumper sticker in my tiny little burg. happens to be on the back of the car of our local locoweed. everybody knows he’s been clinicly insane for decades, this just proves it
Using
I haven’t followed any of the debates, but I don’t think I would even know who Ron Paul is if I weren’t on this blog. I don’t know if he’s covered in the papers–must have missed those days.
October 9th, 2007 at 10:34 PMUsing
How did Fred! (Jazz hands, spirit fingers!) do?
*Yawn*
October 9th, 2007 at 11:19 PMUsing
Honestly, Rudy probably was the best performer in the debate overall, unless points are scored on the basis of who beat Chris Matthews.
October 9th, 2007 at 11:46 PMUsing
Ron Paul came off looking (to me) like a loon. He’s a man with some anger management issues. Maybe he needs a few more massages with Happy Endings. Maybe he should pair up with the Democrat who made the silent movie of himself, throwing a rock in a pond.
Romney, quite honestly, appeared to be quite polished and well-coached, as did Rudy. They both, however, focused too much of their attention on Hillary. Fuck Hillary - there will be plenty of time to skewer that ugly bitch after the primaries.
Fred! handled himself well - but aside from his verbal bitch-slapping of “Christopher” - didn’t seem as charismatic as I know he can be.
Honestly, I’d like to see them drop Paul, Tancredo, and some of the other NoChanceInHell candidates, and actually have some REAL debate on issues.
October 9th, 2007 at 11:57 PMUsing
Rudy did perform well, followed close second by Hunter and Huckabee, but I think Fred! had the mot consistently conservative message and did well for the first outing against them.
October 9th, 2007 at 11:57 PMUsing
Who is Ron Paul again? Black transvestite I think?
October 10th, 2007 at 12:29 AMUsing
And that’s pretty much it for me too, Bill. I like most of what he says, but his isolationist crap just doesn’t cut it with me. I don’t want to sit around waiting for them to come to me, I much prefer to take care of the problem BEFORE that.
And, as you said, his followers are crazier than a shithouse rat.
October 10th, 2007 at 12:54 AMUsing
What I found to be the most ironic statement of the debate was Rudy complaining about frivolous lawsuits after the crap he pulled in NYC that is still clogging the court.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zs5DxwzEXHQ
October 10th, 2007 at 1:03 AMUsing
As I’ve said before, these morons are the new LaRouche Roaches.
Angry, paranoid cultists.
October 10th, 2007 at 2:15 AMUsing
Fanusi Khiyal
Fanusi, thx for pointing this out. I can only second what you say. Europe is in the early phase of a second attempt of being conquered and assimilated into the Umma.
You can see and feel it in certain parts of all major European cities. London, Paris, Berlin, Cologne, Hamburg, Vienna. They all have places that not only do not feel un-European, but where a European citizen would also feel unwelcome, uneasy and ultimately unsafe.
Our current generation of leaders has been bred without much exception in the 68 liberal times where peace and prosperity seemed to be only a matter of making the right compromise. Especially German people are under the impression that there is nothing worse than military confrontation and war. Everything else for them seems to be preferable, no matter what. Understandable given the history of my Fatherland, but unfortunately a path of self-annihilation.
As you rightly point out, we currently lack the leaders to face that threat, to yank our society around and on a path of defending our heritage and our society.
But leaders are just made by the society they are supposed to lead. So our people need to wake up first and realize that their continent and their way of life is under threat of total annihilation. Once that realization hits home, the right leaders will step forward.
I fully agree that both Europe and the US should move aggressively against every country that sponsors, supports or publicly accepts any notion of Islamofacism. But unfortunately at the moment the majority of people in Europe, as far as I can assess that from available information, does not support such a course of action.
What I do see however, is that such support seems to be growing. When you talk to normal people for example in London pubs, away from the direct influence of PC culture and the media, anger is growing. I think we are getting there.
October 10th, 2007 at 2:53 AMUsing
Darth
I think cultist is totally fair, but do you really think they are as as creepy and psycho as LaRouche people?
wiki
October 10th, 2007 at 3:20 AMIn 1974, The New York Times reported on a belief inside the LaRouche organization that one of LaRouche’s followers had been kidnapped and brainwashed by the CIA to become a Manchurian Candidate-style assassin against LaRouche.
Using
I’m not much of a Dr Paul fan, myself, but I enjoy his mother’s fish sticks.
October 10th, 2007 at 7:13 AMUsing
Fred did NOT do well. Color me underwhelmed. Fred’s blowing it big time. His first big debate, and “…it’s rather ironic: The only professional actor in the race couldn’t even pretend he wanted to be there.”
Why don’t all you manly men here take a look at Duncan Hunter? Sure, he’s getting short shrift by the media, but how many of you want to settle for who the media and the Republican Elite say is “electable”?? There ought to be enough strong, devil-may-care thinkers here to see that settling for a celebrity just to “beat Hellary” puts us on the losing side of voting against someone instead of FOR someone.
If you guys start quoting the media and the pointy-headed pundits on “electability”, I’ll puke. WE, the People, decide who is electable. And if we conservatives got our shit together, we’d never be faced with the possibility of compromising our principles on the altar of “electablity”. Duncan Hunter is a true conservative, and it takes a conservative Republican to beat a liberal Democrat. We are guaranteed to lose by choosing someone who’s in the middle (Rudy) or someone who’s barely there (Thompson).
October 10th, 2007 at 7:31 AMUsing
And by “barely there”, I mean “unprepared, soporific, and vague”.
October 10th, 2007 at 7:45 AMUsing
Nitpicker, Fanusi
Of course I didn’t mean that by going there we should ignore the threat that is already here, and you and I have always agreed on that, as far as I’m concerned. The problem with Paul is that’s not what he wants to do. He wants us to retreat behind our borders, stick our heads under the pillow, pull the sheets up over our ears and let the rest of the world plot, plan and prepare against us as they please. Except, of course, according to his theory, as soon as we withdraw completely from the rest of the world, it’ll be as if we’re invisible. All of a sudden every single foreign nation in the world will forget about us and, more importantly, any ambitions they may have on the international scene will be a thing of the past. He’s either certifiably nuts or helplessly naive.
As far as “nation building” goes, I partially agree with him. I’m not the biggest fan of it in the world. However, and this is a big however, sometimes it’s a good investment if it’s done right, in that in ensures peace for a long time to come. Witness Germany and Japan. Not only did we eliminate two extreme threats, we gained two strong and valuable allies on top of it.
Some may say “but what about the German moonbats and greenies et al? They haven’t been all that helpful.” No, they haven’t, but they’re a passing phase. A fever in an otherwise healthy organism. I know the German people, the real German people who are too busy to march in the streets and shit on the sidewalks, or at least I used to, and I’d be surprised to find that they’d changed very much. They’re hard-working folks with a keen sense of right and wrong, a good deal of pride, and they’re bloody fine soldiers. They’ve always been like that, they just caught a bad case of the Nazi bug 70 years ago, and after a heavy dose of penicillin it got out of their system.
Anyway, back to nation building. In order for it to work, and the reason that it hasn’t worked all too well up until now in Iraq (but it’s turning around), is that the twits in Washington, like all too many people among the voters, have decided that they’re too bloody smart to open a history book and pay attention to the lessons that others before us paid a heavy tuition to learn.
You can’t build something worthwhile unless you tear down and remove what was already there FIRST. If you buy a property with a rotten house already sitting on it, you don’t just start building new wings to it. You tear the sucker down and haul off the rubble. And if it was sitting on a rotten slab of concrete, you tear that one up and pour a fresh one as well.
And THAT’S what the Bush Administration failed to understand, in spite of the history books being chock full of instructions. They were in such a hurry to declare the war over and go on to playing with their Legos that they forgot the mission, which was to destroy Islamofascism FIRST. But that’s not the fault of “nation building”, it’s the fault of the functionally illiterate imbeciles in DC failing to read the fucking manual.
October 10th, 2007 at 8:27 AMUsing
Hunter???? Which one was he?
Oh … that’s right. He was the one who answered everything with “China - bad, most favored nation - bad, free trade - bad.”
C’mon … he looks and sounds like a guy who does TV ads for a Kia dealership.
October 10th, 2007 at 9:35 AMUsing
Fred will do fine, in later debates. Ron Paul will slip into dementia and turn into another conspiracy theory believing kook.
I heard one person say this, put Rudy in charge as Attorney General, or another Cabinet level spot, but not as President. Mitt Romney, fine for the Treasury, but fair or not, his Mormonism will be used against him and everyone will equate Big Mitt to The Big Love show. The GOP needs to get its crap together, oust the RINOS, and the no chance in hell types, and focus on some real conservatives with a real chance or we’re gonna get Comrade Hillary and Vice Premier or Chairman Obama.
October 10th, 2007 at 9:46 AMUsing
Emperor Misha I:
How about “New Coke”.
One of the most interesting things I noticed at the September 15 demonstrations in Washington was the presence of the Paulies. Not in our ranks, but marching with the moonbats. The ANSWER cadres wore yellow t-shirts, National Lawyers Guild marshals wore thier traditional light green, and the Paulies wore blue shirts and passed out their cards, and flyers to anyone who failed to pull his hand away in time. I think that shows which side the Paulies really support.
The Republicans may have some in-house trouble now, but the success of the Paulies would mean the McGovernization of the GOP as well as of the demoncraps.
Isn’t Paulie some really obnoxious guy with delusions that he’s a comedian?
October 10th, 2007 at 10:24 AMUsing
Captain, sensors indicate a number of Ronulan vessels in the system.
Poll shields up!
I’m hoping these nuts just don’t go Ross Paul-rot on us after their god is smacked down in the primary.
October 10th, 2007 at 10:31 AMUsing
“>
October 10th, 2007 at 11:04 AMUsing
DASBOW #24
Only with tartar sauce
October 10th, 2007 at 11:10 AMUsing
I’ve said this before.
No one will take him seriously when they think his supporters are desperate to make him relevant. Do what the other candidates supporters do. You can post your comments, write a blog supporting him, wear buttons and pass out pamphlets. Don’t make your self’s look like idiots, by stuffing the ballot boxes. What do you think he could accomplish with the majority of the conservative blogasphere laughing at him because of the likes of you?
Let him win or lose in the arena of ideas. That is the fight worth fighting. That is what makes America great.
TVFOH
The View From Out Here
Or, am I expecting too much out of a bunch that worships a man as a god?
October 10th, 2007 at 1:47 PMUsing
Nothing to add except that Pat Condell is a fucking legend who should be made Supreme Commander of Everything! Nice find Fanusi!
October 10th, 2007 at 2:09 PMUsing
My take FWIW……………
Ron Paul looked like a rabid dog, a foaming at the mouth extremist GRADE D
Tom Tancredo, one trick pony.Hurt himself when he said he would not support nominee. GRADE D+
Mitt Romney , cool, calm, collected, armed with facts, looked presidential. Only gaffe, mentioning consulting Lawyers. GRADE B+
Duncan Hunter informed, mature, intelligent ,but failed to distinguish himself decisively (traction) GRADE B-
Fred Thompson ,looked old, dark circles under eyes, poor makeup,poor posture,little enthuiasm in voice, his suit seemed too small!! (For Gods sake buy a decent suit) But was well informed on facts.In the loop on government mechanics. GRADE C+
Rudy Guilliani, aggressive,informed, but SHORT next to Fred. Spat with Romney was foolish. GRADE B
John McCain, LOOKED OLD !!His three times not hearing the moderators questions made him seem deaf. Same old same old. GRADE C-
Sam Brownback, Was he even there?? GRADE D
October 10th, 2007 at 2:19 PMUsing
If run Rudy McRomeny, they will not come
October 10th, 2007 at 3:02 PMUsing
IF the war on Islam, not Islamofascism because there is no moderate islam, is to succeed then the first actions would be to immediately stop all immigration for muslim nations[.] Second would be to begin deportations of Islamists (not Islamofascists but all Islamists).
This clash of cultures has gone on a long, long time. We are losing as long as we remain ‘tolerant’.
October 10th, 2007 at 3:10 PMUsing
I’m considerin’ voting records only.
What anyone says at this point is pointless pap.
I don’t care if he showed up in his Klingon pajamas, I’m pushin’ for FRED!
October 10th, 2007 at 3:12 PMUsing
should read if the Repub’s run. Do not force RHINO’s down the conservative base’s throats and expect them to vote for it.
And no, it won’t be the conservative base’s fault.
Don’t piss down the back of my neck and tell me it is raining
October 10th, 2007 at 3:14 PMUsing
Cheapshot
But, just think of the resulting ROE in the sandbox!
(Most chilling thought I have ever seen on a button. “It Is An Ancient Klingon Ritual For Courage. Trust Me, Wesley…”)
October 10th, 2007 at 4:52 PM(Although the thought of that little twit of a character in an “ANCIENT” Klingon Courage Ritual is one I find MOST entertaining…)
Using
Or they convert to Christianity or Judaism.
October 10th, 2007 at 10:30 PMUsing
And you don’t let the people who screwed the pooch on the first go around lay the new foundation as Bush did having the idiot islamists write their own constitution, guaranteeing sharia was written into it.
October 11th, 2007 at 1:49 AMUsing