RDF:![[Valid RSS]](valid-rss.png "Validate my RSS feed")
Yes, He Would Be…
Posted by: Emperor Misha I in Hypocrites, Politics, Socialist Swine7:59 PM
Or rather, He IS appalled.
Rarely in the history of mankind has unsuspecting readers of news been exposed to such monumental, preening, dimwitted hypocrisy as this, coming from John “Faggot” Edwards (link thanks to Sir Christopher):
CHAPEL HILL, N.C. (AP) — Democratic presidential hopeful John Edwards says Jesus would be appalled at how the United States has ignored the plight of the suffering…
… Edwards, in an interview with the Web site Beliefnet.com, said Jesus would be most upset with the selfishness of Americans
Oh yes, that’s what we all need right now. A sermon about “appalling selfishness” coming from the Preening Pony who lives in a 28,000 square feet, 6 million dollar mansion paid for, at least in part, by exorbitant contingency fees that he earned by hoodwinking barely sentient apes in a jury box with testimony from beyond the grave, channeled by John “I Hear Dead People” Edwards himself.
We can’t help but wonder how many of the “suffering” this prancing nancy boy has helped. Our guess is… None.
We’re not particularly fond of pretending to know what our Lord and Savior would do or say about any given thing, at least not as fond as the G-dless heathens on the socialist swine’s side of the aisle are, but we’re fairly certain that if the narcissistic, self-aggrandizing, greedy Breck Girl of North Carolina had been around at the time when He was still alive, the Silky Pony would be busy crawling around on the floor of the temple, scratching up his belongings after they’d been thrown off the table.
In the interview, the former North Carolina senator discussed how he lost touch with his day-to-day faith during college, but that it “came roaring back” after the death of his 16-year-old son, Wade, in 1996.
Lucky kid. We don’t know how you feel about those things, but we can’t hardly think of a worse fate than to grow up having to call that effeminate ambulance chaser “dad.” But we guess we’d have to ask poor Wade about that, G-d rest his soul. Perhaps his psychic daddy can help us channel his spirit, or do we have to throw in a multi-million dollar contingency fee to retain his spiritual services?
Edwards has often cited religion as a part of his politics, frequently linking his efforts to fight poverty as a matter of morality.
Well, we think it’s safe to say that he’s fought and won the war against his PERSONAL poverty.
Listen, we have no problem with the PowderPuff Girl’s personal fortune. He earned it, though we suppose we’re really stretching the definition of the word “earn” here, and he can do with it as he pleases, even IF he earned it by lying, pretending to be in possession of supernatural powers and ripping off the general public (what? You didn’t think that somebody would actually have to pay for those damages in the end? Remind us again why universal suffrage is such a good idea), but we DO mind a great deal having to listen to a self-righteous, hypocritical asshat with a tendency to spend more time on his hair than a Hollywood starlet, living in his own Versailles preaching to us about “selfishness”.
We’d tell you to shove it up your toned derriere, girly boy, but we’re afraid you’d like it too much.
Entries (RSS)
No..Edwards…you two faced bastard, what Jesus would find appalling is maggots like you reaping your harvest of pain, misery and sadness. You make a fucking ghoul look good…..
March 5th, 2007 at 8:05 PMUsing
Do we really look that stupid to you, Silky Pony?
March 5th, 2007 at 8:18 PMUsing
Hmmm, so how many of these alledged, “plight of suffering” types has Edwards brought into his lovely new country home?
March 5th, 2007 at 8:29 PMUsing
Hmmmm, why the references to John Edwards as a psychic?
Just wondering…I mean, if he WERE psychic Ann Coulter would not have ticked him off so much…
March 5th, 2007 at 8:44 PMUsing
It refers to an infamous case in which Edwards made millions by channeling an unborn girl to a jury.
March 5th, 2007 at 8:58 PMUsing
Ah, to hell with panzy boy.
I’m old enough not to give a damn for the opinion of any man who has to keep his collar buttoned to hide the circumcision scar on his neck.
Y’all know what’s worse than an anbulance chaser?
One that’s proud of it.
March 5th, 2007 at 9:05 PMUsing
Woah…I did not know that…
Coulter was WAY to nice to that faggot.
March 5th, 2007 at 9:10 PMUsing
Oh, yes. John, the ambulance chaser criticizes Americans for their selfishness?
WWJD? He’d call the silky pony a hypocrite.
March 5th, 2007 at 9:13 PMUsing
this, plus his “Two Americas” theme is just too much to take…
i hear he was in Berkeley on Sunday, not too far from here. Now Berkeley is not part of ANY America i know. Which reminds me fondly of the sign on the freeway exit leading to the university right after 9/11 “You are Now Leaving the United States of America”
March 5th, 2007 at 9:21 PMUsing
Amen, Sir Christopher. When passing through such places, as I do often. I make it a point not to spend one stinking dime in them. After all, that’s capitalism. Even to the point of refusing to buy a pack of smokes in Santa Cruz last week making a delivery…..I waited ’till I got to Watsonville……
March 5th, 2007 at 9:37 PMUsing
Jeebus,
Silky Pony is just ASKING for a photoshoppin’, but there’s just too much material to work from.
I gotta let the mind clear a bit before I tackle this one. Spent all of Sunday watching my season 2 box set of 24 and am a bit numb at the moment….watched 8 episodes in a row…..
gotta chill out a little….only 1 hour to go before 24’s On!!
March 5th, 2007 at 9:48 PMUsing
When this colossal asshole starts opening up that Radio City Music Hall sized cottage of his to all the homeless in the state….THEN he can stand up and spout his hypocritical bullshit. Until then..someone tell that Faggot to STFU!
March 5th, 2007 at 9:49 PMUsing
Yeah Caveman, i have been boycotting San Francisco itself, only making exceptions for client meetings, which unfortunately can’t be avoided.
I’ll take Capitola over Santa Cruz any day, if i MUST eat in the north bay.
To Santa Cruz: Jerry’s Dead, Phish Sucks, Get a Job
March 5th, 2007 at 9:58 PMUsing
But Jaybear, THERE’S NO TIME!!!!!
March 5th, 2007 at 9:59 PMUsing
:jittery_tb:
Please L-rd, make me stop hearing “I’m so pretty, I’m so pretty…”
Bleach or Muriatic acid? or both….
March 5th, 2007 at 11:37 PMUsing
Damn, JB, turn on your IM!
March 5th, 2007 at 11:43 PMUsing
Misha? C’mon. I’m surprised you would write something like this.
As much of a douche as Edwards is, I think his offspring would rejoice to be upright instead of maggot food (from a mangled wreck to begin with).
These fucks serve us a fat hanging one every day. Let’s not deliberately pop it up.
March 6th, 2007 at 2:31 AMUsing
Well, I don’t know about YOU guys, but I take pride in my selfishness.
Whenever I see someone like li’l johnny edwards, hunched down on the sidewalk, shivering from the cold, with hunger and disease wracking his body, I jus’ spit in his li’l tin cup, and tell him, “Get a Job!”
It makes me feel superior.
March 6th, 2007 at 7:46 AMUsing
Edwards talkin about JESUS???????? WTF???? Its WELL KNOWN in Raleigh around the courthouse that Johnny boy is a first class whore dog with MANY notches on his belt. What would Jesus think about that???
March 6th, 2007 at 8:04 AMUsing
Well it was quite tongue-in-cheek and I certainly think it extremely sad and tragic that the poor kid was cut down at such a horribly young age. If I gave the impression that I didn’t, then I do most sincerely apologize. Mea maximum culpa.
I am just extremely sick and tired of empty gas bag politicians parading their deceased family members around for political gain. Of course, in Edwards’ case, it probably comes natural, seeing as how he seems to have built his entire fortune upon the dead and infirm.
March 6th, 2007 at 8:44 AMUsing
Button down shirt to hide his circumcision scar - outstanding! I expect if Dick Cheney had been talking to Edwards instead of Leahy, John’s response would have been “I have, I do, I will”.
March 6th, 2007 at 11:47 AMUsing
And what about all the suffering he has caused by putting doctors out of business using fake science? Untold numbers of women uncared for because this monera (with apologies to actual pond scum) made it impossible to keep an OB/GYN practice open. Never mind that my malpractice insurance went up 400% in one year.
March 6th, 2007 at 5:46 PMUsing
Having lived in the People’s Republic of Santa Cruz for 7 years, I can say I have never heard anyone call the area “North Bay”. The Sausalito area yes, but SC? not so much. Maybe you can enlighten me?
March 6th, 2007 at 6:00 PMUsing
[…] at least point out that scamp crawling around on the floor, trying to glimpse himself some Ann Coulter upskirt: Lucky kid. We don’t know how you feel about those things, but we can’t hardly think of a worse […]
March 6th, 2007 at 6:15 PMUsing
I certainly assumed it was. I just knew you’d appreciate how it looked and the fuel it would give leftists.
You know with this particulary vile crop running, it will go from the figurative to the literal very soon. What’s the over/under to when the Goracle™ digs up his dead sister to shake down an eeeeeeeeevil tobacco company? Or for the Toxicunt™ (Hitlery) to dig up some botched abortion victim and travel the stump circuit?
March 6th, 2007 at 6:58 PMUsing
Why do you type “G-d” when you mean God?
I honestly mean no disrespect by asking.
March 6th, 2007 at 8:01 PMUsing
Many people (of varied Faiths) believe it is disrespectful to spell G-d’s name in full. I myself was never taught that (us Southern Baptist are a bit more lenient on things like that), but I can certainly understand it and I generally try to honor that…although I tend to forget from time to time.
March 6th, 2007 at 8:11 PMUsing
Thanks for the nice answer. I still don’t really get it. I was brought up Catholic, although I’m not so religious these days. My thing is, I just don’t see how He could be offended by “G-O-D” but not “G-D” when they clearly mean the same thing. Isn’t the offense that you’re referring to him in the first place?
I guess what I’m saying is that wouldn’t it be best to just leave him out of it?
Again, I’m not trying to be disrespectful. I think this is an interesting discussion.
March 6th, 2007 at 8:22 PMUsing
It’s an honest question, not disrespectful at all.
The short version is that writing is permanent. Therefore, whereas the writer may not have meant any disrespect, it is perfectly possible for somebody else to do so. Say you write it on a piece of paper. There’s nothing to stop somebody from using that piece of paper as toilet tissue or a snot rag later on.
That’s the short version. It’s to respect and protect the name of G-d from abuse and disrespect.
March 6th, 2007 at 8:38 PMUsing
Well, this may be a thread highjack but the name of God is יהוה, which is typically pronounced “Yahweh”.
This name was transliterated (and incorrectly) as Iehouah in 1530, Iehovah in 1611, and Jehovah in 1769.
“God” is not really His proper name. It is more like the ultimate generic proper noun since there are other “gods”. We use a capital “G” to denote Him specifically but it is not really the same thing as Yahweh.
March 6th, 2007 at 9:05 PMUsing
I can’t believe Deadwards is trying to push this crapola. He obviously believes that it’ll play well for the God-believin’ red state rubes (his opinion, not mine).
Most people aren’t going to buy it.
Me, I wear my status as heathen openly (as fellow Rotties can attest), since the only office I’d ever be interested in seeking is a CSM’s office.
I don’t care what god a gov’t official worships, or not, except Allah. And even then, if there was such a thing as reform Islam, I could be cool with that.
But if a person takes office, then the Constitution damn well better be their God and Bible.
March 6th, 2007 at 10:22 PMUsing
Oh, last minute correction/edit. When I said
There are exceptions. #1, The worship of Marx or the Almighty State are right out.
#2, no human sacrifice allowed, so Aztek deities with hard-to-pronounce names are a no-go. Although the rule against human sacrifice falls under #1, too (I’m looking at you, Hillary).
#3, I reserve the right to question mental health if they go around giving praise to Zeus, Ra, or Amaterasu. We’re pretty much all atheists on that score.
#4, Not so much an exception as an observation: A healthy belief in Karma could actually be a plus.
March 6th, 2007 at 11:04 PMUsing
Not trying to hijack any thread. This is just what I took out of the post.
Again, my thing is, no matter how you refer to God, be it G-d, or * or whatever, you are clearly representing Him on the page.
I am not an anti-religious person, although I find it difficult to catagorize my faith. It just strikes me as disingenuous to use His name in such a way. If your religion precludes you from involving Him in such discussions (or such verbage), then including Him in such a way seems wrong. That’s all.
March 7th, 2007 at 9:34 AMUsing
When one finds oneself writing down their joy at the death of a child because one dislikes the parents, make sure you aren’t forgetting the important things
It is possible to bleed to death because you sliced across your wrist, but it is far better to slice down. You are less likely to survive. But please, toss your children under a bus first.
If you rejoice at the death of a child and a parent’s grief, you are a failure as a humna being on every possible level, and should remove yourself and your spawn from the world.
March 7th, 2007 at 2:35 PMUsing
Reading comprehension issues, much?
March 7th, 2007 at 2:37 PMUsing
“Lucky kid. We don’t know how you feel about those things, but we can’t hardly think of a worse fate than to grow up having to call that effeminate ambulance chaser ‘dad.’”
I dunno. What part of that is being misinterpreted? You hate his father, so you are happy his son is dead, because then he didn’t have to see his dad. Typing “g-d” instead of “god” is irrelevant. That’s not the sort of thought a Christian would ever have. Christ did not enjoy the suffering of others.
Again, something is seriously wrong with that. Don’tany of you care about another human being at all? Does human misery mean so little?
I’ll send the razors. I think most would agree it’s for the best.
March 7th, 2007 at 2:45 PMUsing
And where, exactly, did I say that *I* was happy that the poor kid is dead?
Damn, you have some serious reading issues on top of your obvious psychological ones.
March 7th, 2007 at 2:55 PMUsing
So no mention of G*d, but Edwards channeling dead people in Jesus gets a pass, right?
March 7th, 2007 at 3:15 PMUsing
Absolutely no, he doesn’t get a pass on that. Not from me, anyway. I think that talk like that is usually crap. Any time someone tells you they know what Jesus thinks, or God thinks, I think you should smell a rat.
March 7th, 2007 at 3:38 PMUsing
SOMEGUY
Why dont you attempt READING ALL of the comments before you attack someone!
UMMMM case in point:
So NOW you can get down off your high horse you stupid moron and go find something else to occupy that little pea you lovingly call your brain! Ta Ta Toodles!!
March 7th, 2007 at 4:10 PMUsing
You will find that Misha mentions G*d on a regular basis then. I wonder what Amanda though would say about Edwards doing this though.
March 7th, 2007 at 4:13 PMUsing
Misha, I assumed you let your fingers type faster than you thought, but maybe that isn’t the case. When you say “lucky kid” you at least imply that you regard the event as fortunate.
“mama misha walked in on the Emperor touching himself to guns & ammo and Boy’s Life again. Lucky woman.” See, it implies that the even would be agood thing.
You mock the death of a man’s child. Somehow, given that, I am unconcerned about your accusation I have mental issues. I withdraw my suicide suggestion. please, seek counseling. You are obviously unwell. I don’t mean that in an insulting way. A normal person doesn’t react that wy to other people’s pain. When footage is shown of people celebrating the fall of the twin towers on 9/11, normal people think something is wrong with them. Similarly, when you mock a person for losing a child, th correct reaction is pity or disgust. Some of what you say elsewhere has merit, and is worth reading, but I am disturbed to find myself agreeing with you in any wy if you feel this way about your fellow human.
You grasp that, right? John Edwards is a human being, with similar DNA to the rest of us, beloved by God, like all of His children. At some point, he had a child die, rather unexpectedly. Every parent I’ve ever known, regardless of ideology, would rather be torn apart my jackals than have that happen. I’ve nver heard anything to suggest that Edwards is different in that regard. So, a man suffers the greatest pain a person can suffer and it amuses you. This has nothing to do with politics. That isn’t a healthy response.
When a person makes disgusting noises and spews plegm about, it doesn’t mean he’s a bad person. it means he is ill. Same principle. Either way, that person needs a doctor.
I’m assuming you’ll ignore this, and probably delete my account. Either way, I’m done here. Hopefully, God opens your heart and heals you, or medicine does.
the rest of you should be asking why you encourage this. This is hardly Christian, compassionate, a traditional value, or civil. is this the type of discourse we see as the ideal. “Democrats are nasty, unpleasant people” doesn’t explain choosing to be a nasty, unpleasant person. If you emulate the worst you see in people, why should you be respected?
March 7th, 2007 at 4:22 PMUsing
Um no someguy I think that must be your claim to fame. I’m also guessing that you work in the psyche sector of the health field. Call me crazy, but it’s just a hunch. Really sad how you keep reading over the part where Misha made his true feelings known. Or is that just part of your MO. Overlooking facts so that you can have something to bitch about? GO take a deep breath, a nice hot bath, and have a joint,….. or something,….. and get your skivvies out of that wad! It has to be terribly uncomfortable!
March 7th, 2007 at 4:32 PMUsing
Apart from demonstrating that you couldn’t flame yourself out of a paper bag doused with gasoline, you once again prove that you can’t read.
Now, giving you the benefit of the doubt by assuming that you really are sub-retarded and aren’t merely pretending to be, I’ll translate the comment for you.
Please go very slow as you mouth the words to what I’m about to write:
I was saying, in a fashion obviously too hideously complex for your tragically impaired neurons to comprehend, that if I were John Edwards’ son, I’d consider myself lucky to not be alive, since it would free me from the fate of having to live a long life calling him “dad.”
This coming from somebody who, less than two hours ago, were suggesting that I murder my own children and then kill myself.
Thanks, counselor, but no thanks, I’m not particularly interested in your psychological advice. Nor am I interested in a referral to your soul mate, Charles Manson.
Nothing about it amuses me. Quit projecting, you sick bastard. It disgusts me that neurotic freaks like Silky Pony can’t wait to dig up their dead relatives and wave their rotting corpses in the air when they’re on the campaign trail, stumping for themselves.
Don’t let the door hit you in the butt on your way out.
And please, for the love of G-d, do something about your strange fascination with murdering infants.
March 7th, 2007 at 4:36 PMUsing
“
mamaMrs misha walked in on the Emperor touching himself to guns & ammo andBoy’s LifeLyudmila again. Lucky woman.”Oh Yeah,… STAY THE FUCK OUTTA MY BEDROOM you perverted voyeur piece of dung!
March 7th, 2007 at 4:44 PMUsing
Yeah someguy, I’m curious about how you feel about those nasty bitches Mr. Jesus talking Edwards hired and then fired then hired and then quit. Misha says things in jest, those nasty women didn’t.
Get over yourself twit. You need to go to shut up school and then go to the store and buy a clue.
March 7th, 2007 at 4:49 PMUsing
Misha, I love how you guys get these idiots who lecture you when so much crap comes out of the left and not a peep. But I did find an excellent article on tolerating intolerance and how they can justify the religion of peace *spit.
March 7th, 2007 at 4:59 PMUsing
You should be, assmunch. It appears to be spot-on.
March 7th, 2007 at 7:07 PMUsing