Why Is Everybody Always Pickin’ On Me?
Posted by: Emperor Misha I in Democrat Arses11:44 AM
Poor Osama Obama, it doesn’t matter what he says, he’ll still get a thorough beating from everybody:
The Illinois senator warned Pakistani President Gen. Pervez Musharraf that he must do more to shut down terrorist operations in his country and evict foreign fighters under an Obama presidency, or Pakistan will risk a U.S. troop invasion and losing hundreds of millions of dollars in U.S. military aid.
Well, that’s how the Associated (with terrorists) Press interpreted his words, but we all know that literacy and reading comprehension aren’t either of them one of their fortes. Thankfully, they commit the grave error of actually quoting him in the next paragraph:
“Let me make this clear,” Obama said in a speech prepared for delivery at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. “There are terrorists holed up in those mountains who murdered 3,000 Americans. They are plotting to strike again. It was a terrible mistake to fail to act when we had a chance to take out an al-Qaida leadership meeting in 2005. If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and President Musharraf won’t act, we will.”
Do you see anything about “troop invasions” in there, because His Majesty can’t seem to find it anywhere. Unless the military strategy geniuses at the Associated (with dementia) Press believe that the only way to “act” is to launch a full-scale military invasion, boots and tracks on the ground and all.
What he’s actually saying makes perfect sense and, had it come from somebody even remotely believable on the issue, we’d even applaud it. But this is the same B. Hussein Obama who, a week or so ago, declared proudly on national TV that Yes, Virginia, he would immediately sit down with the worst tyrants, murderers and terrorist leaders in the world without preconditions the very moment he attained the White House.
So obviously, there’s some sort of logical disconnect here, unless his foreign policy is based on dealing humbly and without preconditions with our declared enemies while bombing the snot out of those who are, at the very least, our nominal allies (and, truth be told, there’s some doubt as to whether Musharraf even deserves even that much recognition). Which would, admittedly, be a novel approach, but not exactly one that we have much faith in. “Divide et impera” is His Majesty’s motto, it’s not “piss off as many people simultaneously as possible, just because we can.” Well, it is, but not when it comes to military strategy.
But hey, he got a huge bitch slap in the polls after last week’s “can’t we all just get along with Hugo, Mahmoud, Bandar, Kim Jong-Il and Zawahiri” declaration, so obviously he, being a politician, has to say something that at least sounds fierce, even though everybody knows that he’s less likely to follow through than pigs are to grow wings.
But pretend for a moment that this wasn’t B. Hussein Obama saying it. What’s so unreasonable about saying “if you assholes insist on offering safe harbor for ragheaded terrorist scum murdering our citizens, then you can wave goodbye to the freebies paid for by those American citizens AND we might just decide to send in a strike or two ourselves to take out the trash IF we have actionable intelligence?”
Sorry, all you Dances with Unicorns fans, but I don’t see anything unreasonable in that. Then again, I’m the kind of Emperor who would, given actionable and verifiable intelligence about an al-Qaeda cell operating freely, with local government knowledge and silent or open consent, in Quebec, would gleefully send in a flight of Hornets to melt their Camemberts past the point where they could possibly enjoy them.
It used to be that was the first responsibility of governments: Protect your citizens and, if you see a clear and present threat to them, eliminate it. By any means necessary.
Yeah, I’m old fashioned that way. Don’t expect any apologies for that.

![Validate my RSS feed [Valid RSS]](valid-rss.png)


Entries (RSS)
[…] Quarters, michellemalkin.com, QandO , Redstate, Little Green Footballs, Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler, Riehl World View, Outside The Beltway, National Review, Confederate Yankee, Sister Toldjah, […]
August 1st, 2007 at 12:10 PMUsing
If I thought for one second he meant it, I’d take a serious look at him next year. As it is …..
August 1st, 2007 at 12:26 PMFoist?!
Using
That was a stretch, even by the AP’s standards.
What next, we’ll have the journaljizmer’s describing B. Hussein as the ’swaggering’ candidate, reminiscent of the American Lion TR?
OK, I’ll take the flight lead, but no way am I going to put my boots on the ground in Quebec.
During my last visit to Canada’s bastard-child province I noticed the indigenous human female population (irrespective of age) had this strange aversion to shaving their armpits.
August 1st, 2007 at 12:43 PMUsing
Obama’s inexperience is showing. I wonder what the cliche spewing commander-in-chief wannabe will say next. I am sure Hillary can’t wait since every time he opens his mouth she goes further ahead in the polls.
August 1st, 2007 at 1:57 PMUsing
Obama saying he would meet all of those slimeballs without conditions did show him inexperience and I’d groan when I’d heard about it. That being him, he is right that if the leader of Pakistan doesn’t remove the trash in his backyard, we should do it. And I have to agree with Misha, it doesn’t have to be troops on the ground when a few well placed missiles, based on accurate intel, can do the job.
With that said, doesn’t mean I’d bet for him, either in the primaries or if he’s the Dem’s candidate. Why? I’d already said it in the first paragraph. Doesn’t mean I’ll vote for the she-beast. I’d had enough of Clinton in the White House, thank you very much. Good, I am so, so tempted to become an independent.
What, thought I was going to say Republican? Shame on you if you thought that.
August 1st, 2007 at 2:42 PMUsing
God, I meant, that being said in the second sentence.
August 1st, 2007 at 2:43 PMUsing
Open mouth, insert foot. Repeat ad nauseam.
With great minds like this running the country, it’s no wonder nobody takes the USA seriously anymore.
August 1st, 2007 at 3:44 PMUsing
Heck, I’m not a Republican anymore. In the original sense of the designation, yes, but the way that label is being brutally assraped now by the fucking RINO shitheads in Congress?
I’d sooner become a member of the communist party.
I wouldn’t support those fuckwads with somebody else’s dick. Proudly independent, that’s what I am.
August 1st, 2007 at 4:57 PMUsing
But, what about the exit plan?
August 1st, 2007 at 5:20 PMUsing
I was for the war before I was against it before I was for it again.
O. Hussein Obama.
So, Bush is again smart enough to start a war to improve himself, Halliburton, Karl Rove and the Veep, smart enough to stage the 9/11 attacks, but so stupid as to not be able to prosecute the GWOT properly, according to the Muslim rep from Illinois. Here we go again, folks, and there’s no way he means it. All I can see from this is the Pakis getting even more pissed at letting more of the cross-border crap continue.
And someone tell him that upsetting a Mooselimb country that already has nukes probably isn’t in the best interest of the US…
August 1st, 2007 at 5:42 PMUsing
Yep, that strongly worded letter should do the trick!
August 1st, 2007 at 6:03 PMUsing
I’ve long wondered why Pakistan hadn’t come up on this site.
Vulcanrider
Did he actually say the 9/11 attacks were staged?
I don’t understand why you would say the Pakis are pissed about the cross-border crap, when they have been the ones withdrawing their troops from the border. Maybe I missed something.
August 1st, 2007 at 6:17 PMUsing
In other news, can we question their patriotism now?
Big .jpg from a comic book cover
August 1st, 2007 at 10:09 PMUsing
This is the 4th time I’ve tried to write something in response to this post. The last three were fairly eloquent dissertations on preconditions to going to war, such as getting a declaration from Congress, general mobilization, instituting a war economy and rationing, and fighting to win. But I just finished a busy shift in the E.D, my feet hurt, and my hands are shaking from too much bad coffee. So I’ll keep it simple. Fuck them. All the simpering little weasels in this crop of presidential candidates. All of them. Both sides of the Aisle. Not one of ‘em has the stones to stand up and tell the truth, much less say that right and wrong mean something anymore. We didn’t lose in Korea, we appeased Communism. We didn’t lose in Vietnam, we were sold out by 2 administrations on behalf of big business. And we’re gonna get sold out by 2 more. The current one, and the next. Fuck ‘em.
August 1st, 2007 at 11:41 PMUsing
Who is the idiot with the stupid helmet?
August 2nd, 2007 at 12:28 AMUsing
1oldleg:
The best chance we have are Duncan Hunter and Fred Thompson. I have strong belief that these two men wouldn’t sell this nation down the river (Hunter’s an ex-Army Ranger) and both know the seriousness of the threats facing this nation.
August 2nd, 2007 at 1:41 AMUsing
Deathknyte, that would be the crazed hero of the book that just slaughtered the Executive Branch of the Government and promised free elections to the American people now that the criminals in power were gone.
August 2nd, 2007 at 1:53 AMUsing
demonicgerbil
August 2nd, 2007 at 2:31 AMWell, I’m glad you say he’s crazed. You guys really worry me at times.
Using
Misha,
Ack, Misha’d just said a dirty word.
August 2nd, 2007 at 4:45 AMUsing
Lived in Kweebeck for almost a decade. Yes, some are.. shall we say.. hirsute- but the others!
Oh, yum yum yum….
Now, if you were talking about the indigenous population of short hairy asterix and obelix baggy drawstring trouser wearing maudite BS quebecois bastards, then by all means, bomb away.
Of course, it’s cheaper and more fun to let the Mohawks at them. Hell hath no fury like a pissed off Mohawk from the Rez. They are hard motherfuckers, and solid, dependable allies.
August 2nd, 2007 at 5:01 AMUsing
seagoon
August 2nd, 2007 at 5:21 AM” hairy asterix and obelix baggy drawstring trouser wearing maudite BS quebecois bastards”
—–what on earth does that mean?
Using
hairy- self explanatory.
Asterix and Obelix baggy drawstring trouser wearing- Gaulish cartoon characters who wore baggy, usually vertically striped or check trousers. Very popular among some strata of Quebec society.
Maudite (goddamned) BS (bienetre sociale- roughly, welfare bum) quebecois (masculine from quebec) bastards.
Got it now?
I bet Mister Dromedary understands…
Him being a maudite tete-carre bloke comme moi (goddamn squareheaded anglophone like me)
Ah to be back in Quebec…
August 2nd, 2007 at 6:19 AMUsing