Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/cache.php on line 36

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/query.php on line 21

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-includes/theme.php on line 540

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-content/plugins/move_comments/move_comments.php on line 38

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home/misha/public_html/2007/wp-content/plugins/move_comments/move_comments.php on line 309
Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler » The Pussification of the Western Male
You are viewing the Archives for 2007.......If you want the current page, CLICK HERE.......

Is an essay that should be read by one and all, not just men.

Because Kim, one of my dearest friends in the world, is kind enough to put into words what all of us men know already. What we don’t usually say in polite and, more importantly, mixed company because we know that it will be seen as rude and what’s the bloody point? We all know it, so why go on about it if we know that some people in the party become offended by it? It’s no less true because we don’t mention it, but we won’t have to waste precious time defending what is the self-evident truth to wankers, tossers and ankle-pissers who insist on arguing the point.

Real men don’t waste time arguing the political correctness of the law of gravity, we just recognize that it’s there.

What made that essay, The Pussification of the Western Male, a favorite essay of mine is that Kim took the time and trouble, in a fit of pique and the RCOB, to explain it to the world. To spell it out in large bloody letters what being a man is all about, things we men already know, but none dare speak out loud because it’s either pointless or because we don’t want to piss people off when it’s not going to do a damn bit of good anyway.

If you’re not a man or if you are one and haven’t had the upbringing that Kim and I had, that post is a free, open look into the soul of a man.

And, of course, the usual pissers will whine and moan about how it isn’t “right” or how it’s something that is “fixable.” Shut the fuck up. It isn’t. It’s who we are. I can’t count the number of column inches that have been wasted trying to explain the “real man” and how he can be “fixed” over the years, and none of them know what the fuck they were talking about, because none of them were real men. Being a man isn’t a disease that can be “cured”, it’s who you are, and if you’re worth a damn thing, you’ll never change it.

And if there’s one thing that hacked me off (when it wasn’t amusing me how ignorant people are), it’s that the reaction to that post wasn’t “oh damn, now somebody finally explained how men think”, but “oh, that won’t do. How can we fix it?”

I often despair of how stupid the average hominid that I am unfortunate enough to call a member of my own species is.

And then I read a post like this by a woman who is married to a real man who truly Gets It. Now that is beautiful.

Here’s a hint to all of those women (and metrosexuals) who find Kim’s post “offensive:” We’re not demanding that you change. We’re just trying to explain to you who we are. We’re also working on finding out who you are and it would be a damn sight more helpful if you’d just tell us. We don’t want you to be like us, if we did we’d marry our own kind with disastrous consequences for the perpetuation of mankind, we just want to understand you and accept you for what you are.

And all that we ask in return is that you do the same thing.

Is that too much to ask?

If you think that it is, then, well, have a nice rest of your life without us, because we’re not going to change.

86 Responses to “The Pussification of the Western Male”
  1. ohio right wing nut Comment by ohio right wing nut

    AMEN KIM

    I’ve been sayin it for years and all I get is your a pig, My dad didn’t raise me to be a pussy, he raised me to be a provider, a protector, A MAN.

    And for that I will be forever greatful!

    Here’s to you dad :em94:

  2. ohio right wing nut Comment by ohio right wing nut

    Oh and foist.

  3. DJ Allyn,  ITW Comment by DJ Allyn, ITW

    It sounds like someone is feeling threatened.

    I think what you are describing is the shift from a patriarch society to a matriarch society.

    I am trying to figure out what is so terrifying about that.

    Besides, hasn’t the woman always had the last say in your household?

    She has, if you knew what was good for you… :em99:

  4. LC NCLivingBrit Comment by LC NCLivingBrit

    Don’t be daft, they don’t want to eliminate the real man, they want to eliminate gender altogether.

    University of Vermont Adds ‘Gender-Neutral’ Bathrooms
    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,294633,00.html

    I’ve read that essay a few times and every time it rings so true. Things that my wife has said or done (usually in reaction to things I’ve said or done) make far more sense. I guess it’s comforting to know that if the noises are suspicious or the alarm system goes off she gets the phone and I get the dark apartment and the shotgun (a second shotgun is being procured for wifely use, anyone with one for sale at a reasonable price in the Triangle, NC please do contact me).

    Her father is a real man, who worked hard all his life to provide for his family, who wasn’t afraid to tell them when they’re being dumbasses and who has been married to the same woman for nearly fourty years. I’ve nothing but respect and admiration for my father in law and since marrying his daughter, I’ve taken to asking myself “would Tony do that?”…… So far it’s proven a damn fine metric. My own father was somewhat less suitable as a role model, so many of the lessons I’ve learned I learned late, from others.

    One thing I do disagree with is the small dogs thing. We had (one passed recently from a massive seizure) two tiny chihuahuas who I love(d) immensely. Yes, they’re rats with crazy bulging eyeballs. Yes, they’re crazy…. But they’re also amazingly loving animals and perfect for our semi-neat apartments. I wept like an infant when we got to the vet to find we were too late to say goodbye to Miss Ouisa, even while I tried to comfort my wife and crying in front of her is something I really try and avoid.

    I guess I’d say I’m working on being a real man, with a lot of the framing and drywall done with some fixtures and fittings still to go in. Oh and pedicures rule, it doesn’t make you feminine to want someone to rub yer damn feet and carve off some of that leather!

  5. Unregistered Pingback by House of Eratosthenes

    […] friend James at News Blog Central. And the other, which we find via our other blogger friend Misha at Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler, is The Pussification of the Western Male by one Kim du […]

  6. SoCalOilMan, LC Comment by SoCalOilMan, LC

    It sounds like someone is feeling threatened.

    Yeah, I do feel threatened. From every side I’m being told that being man and going with my “evolutionary inbred” ways of dealing with life is wrong, and somehow I have to change this. Yet the female “evolutionary inbred” traits are what I should adjust myself to. different roles and different needs.

    Woman: kid’s sick, I’ll use a sick day and nurture…Man: kid’s sick, gotta make sure he’s got food and Robitusin and can pay the medical bill if it’s serious.

    I think what you are describing is the shift from a patriarch society to a matriarch society.

    Can’t we all just get along? Why does one have to be dominate over the other? I’m sure there’s a middle ground in there somewhere.

    I am trying to figure out what is so terrifying about that.

    For someone to tell me that all my natural tendencies to provide and protect are just caveman, yeah it’s a little terrifying. If I could be convinced that my wife and child didn’t need my protection, I’d agree, but it is a nasty world out there, I’d rather die trying to protect them from harm, than hope they weren’t hurt because I didn’t want to create more tension.

    Besides, hasn’t the woman always had the last say in your household?

    She has, if you knew what was good for you…

    A lot of times…OK most, she did win out, but that’s where an equal woman mitigates a man’s “charge ahead and solve this problem” comes in. Working together and using the best of both our inclinations seems to be a good mix.

  7. Unregistered Comment by fporretto

    – We’re not demanding that you change. We’re just trying to explain to you who we are. –

    Mistake, Mischa.

    Never apologize and never explain. Even on your way to the gallows, never, ever apologize or explain. Either you did what you did for good and sufficient reasons, or it was inexcusable and no words will suffice.

    The only respect-compelling attitude is “I am what I am; take me or leave me as you please.” Or, as the old song runs:

    “Hard livin’s my pleasure,
    “My money’s my own,
    “And them as don’t like me,
    “Can leave me alone.”

    That is the quintessence of tolerance in a free society, the only attitude we can categorically recommend to all persons without infringing on anyone’s freedom of conscience or association. “They” don’t need to explain themselves to us; we don’t need to explain ourselves to “them.” And each of us chooses his associates according to his own tastes.

  8. feminizedwesternmale Comment by feminizedwesternmale

    Excellent essay, and thanks for the link. This may not be the root of all of our problems, but it offers a healthy way to begin the hard work of rehabilitating our society. See my name.

  9. LC&IB Vulcanrider Comment by LC&IB Vulcanrider

    People where my wife works still giggle and ask her “why does VR let you come in the door first, and what’s up with the car door? No one opens a car door for anyone else.”. Her comment, “Hey, he might look like a biker, talk like a sailor and dress bad, but he’s a real man and respects women”. Also might explain the 26 years of marriage.

    I’m sick of movies, the press *spit* and especially television portraying men as the weaker sex, total wimps that need their female counterparts to make sure they get their privates back in their pants after a piss (or worse yet, make sure they sit to pee).

    I drink, I smoke cigars, I dip Cope on occasion (well, ok, when I’m outdoors, period)and I ride a BIG motorcycle. I also hold the door for any female (or male acting like one, but that’s another issue) and even say “yes ma’am” and “thank you ma’am” to the 16 year old at the drive up fast food place. It’s not beneath me to help that lady put her bags in the car while all you so-called “sensitive” males walk by smirking. Laugh at me if you like, asswipes, but let me enlighten you about something. Those “ladies” you want to “hook up” with? It’s guys like us that keep taking them from YOU, nancy-boy! And it’s not the image, it’s the simple courtesy. I’ve met very few ladies that don’t appreciate being treated like one…

  10. LC Mrs. M-ITT™ Comment by LC Mrs. M-ITT™

    It sounds like someone is feeling threatened.

    I think what you are describing is the shift from a patriarch society to a matriarch society.

    I am trying to figure out what is so terrifying about that.

    Besides, hasn’t the woman always had the last say in your household?

    Oh get off it DJ. You’re talking like a New Age Feminized Male when you spout that crap.

    Most women will certainly try to make out like they rule the roost, but we really just want men to act like MEN dammit!! If that means we have to nag and bitch to get you off your ass and DO SOMETHING then we will. I might have the last say about how the house is decorated, or what restaurant we go eat at, or M might allow me to have a say as to whether he spends $500 on a new gun, or $9,000 on a new motorcycle (both times I told him that as long as we could keep the bills paid to knock himself out…I didn’t care….just be prepared to buy ME a new gun as soon as the money becomes available.) but when it matters, I defer to what M wants or decides. He’s the head of the house. (that doesn’t mean I don’t bitch about things he does or doesn’t do…that’s what us wimmens do.)

    But this attitude about Patriarchal evolving to Matriarchal is BULLSHIT. That’s NOT how it should be and that’s the biggest problem we have in society today. Do you know how that crap got started? By a bunch of whining, nagging shrews that couldn’t get a real man to touch them with someone else’s dick. No real man in his right mind would have anything to do with such harridans, and they decided to get their revenge by castrating the Male Society to the point that we now have men that spend more time on hair and skin care than most women (for G-d’s Sake just take a shower and shave!!). Men that think it’s better to surrender than to fight. Men that have given up the role of provider and protector. Men that have allowed themselves to be “feminized” to the point that they are as useless as a windshield wiper on a goat’s ass.

    Real women may roll their eyes and wrinkle their noses when they’re with a bunch of men who are talking about guns and cars, telling dirty jokes, farting, scratching their balls, and laughing loud enough to be heard three miles away…..but here’s a little secret for ya. At those times, we women actually feel more protected and secure and more feminine than ever. We know that those farting, scratching, laughing men will turn into fierce warriors that will mutilate anything and anyone that attempted to harm us. We know they will stand up for us, and stand up for what is right. We know they will do all within their power to right a wrong, even at the cost of their own lives.

    Damn but I love Real Men!!!

    Feminine males like Silky Pony Edwards can just go sit in the corner and brush their hair. I have absolutely NO use for them.

  11. Unregistered Comment by Beartrapper

    I guess I must be a throwback.
    I do say yes ma’am or no ma’am even to the young girl at the drive thru, just seems like good manners to me.
    I open the door for the wife, and anyone else for that matter. Just seems like good manners.
    I do not now, nor have I ever worked with a woman, or in a job that I had to stay inside.
    I’ve never had to attend any classes on sensitivity, or had to see a workplace counseler (does OSHA count?). If I want to say “You’re fired”, I say “You’re fired”, and that’s that.
    I make no apologies for the straight pipes on my powerstroke, or the table saw that I may crank up at 7am, or the occasional 30rd mag that gets unloaded as fast as I can pull the trigger. Fuck em all and feed em fish heads.
    As Hank jr said, “I can skin a buck and I can run a trot line and a country boy can survive.”, and this old country boy will not change.
    And you know something, I’m not the only one. I look around at my workmates and friends and even the people at the Rott….there’s lots of guys like me.
    So say please and thank you and yes sir/ma’am when apppropriate, and say fuck you when you need to. And don’t be afraid to stand up when you know you’re right!

  12. Unregistered Comment by jkaiseresquire

    Your premise is confirmed by noted metrosexual, John Edwards. The guy can’t defend himself against Ann Coulter, Barrack Obama, and Hillary- instead he gets his wife to do it. How sad.

    John Kaiser

  13. LC HJ Caveman82952 Comment by LC HJ Caveman82952

    Misha…..well said, very well said. Among the phrases used to describe me at work are two words…..Old school. I take it as the greatest of compliments. Like men I admired, straightforward, strong, mean what they say and say what they mean. In other moments I have reverted to my collegate creative writing and simply referred to myself as an ossified relic of a bygone era. I don’t laugh when I say it. Yet, given a choice, I rank with the with the most gentle of people, lifting a little abondoned puppy at the pound yesterday, the grand opening we all fought for here in town for a new clean facility for abandoned or abused critters. My heart remains touched by the needs of critters, veterans and those suffering from birth defects. When we lost our baby boy…….I did what men often do, retired to the garage….alone. I had to be strong for my wife, her heart broken, her spirit shattered. A profound belief in God leads me to behave in what I perceive an honorable fashion. To work hard, be honest and trustworthy, to be a friend, to know, understand and face human nature as it truly is, regardless of the wailing of the left, and from that knowledge and experience, to be willing to stand shoulder to shoulder with other men defending our families. The gals can wipe out any left. Simply put, both sexes need each other, as nature programmed us to be. Men were basically expendible, save for hunting and protecting women from other men. Once impregnated, the cycle was done and the man became expendible. Women are not. I view my wife as a patient, forgiving, strong angel and love her dearly for it. Twenty-six years together teaches you things, those having been there require no elaboration. Those still to do so will know in time. Yet when the going gets tough…..it’s Dad that has to run point……comes with the job description. And why does all this leave a lump in my throat? Perhaps due to the notion I will stand on my porch, gun in hand, defending those I love….or in court, or on the street. I have been told by my wife the feminists despise me, yet the other women admire and respect me. I call them all Ma’am, regardless of age. Must be those years in Kentucky. And if that be old fashioned, I am very much indeed an ossified relic of a bygone era…..

  14. Emperor Misha I Comment by Emperor Misha I

    Mistake, Mischa.

    Never apologize and never explain. Even on your way to the gallows, never, ever apologize or explain. Either you did what you did for good and sufficient reasons, or it was inexcusable and no words will suffice.

    You are, of course, right Francis. I guess I wasn’t as precise in my wording as I should’ve been (not that that’s anything new where I’m concerned). I didn’t mean to use “explain” in the sense “to justify”, I meant it purely in the descriptive sense, which is why I should have used the proper word, “describe”, instead.

    Because, as you say, there isn’t anything to “justify.” I am who I am, and if I try to elaborate on the why it’s only because I want to set things straight and I detect a desire to know. Because I’m not going to change. I’m just describing a fact of life and that’s that. I don’t want women to be “more like me” to please me, because it wouldn’t. I don’t love women in spite of the differences, I love them because of the differences. And I insist that they return the favor if they want to be around me. If they don’t want to do that, then fine. Just do it somewhere else.

  15. Unregistered Comment by mrsdutoit

    Interesting that someone can say “matriarchal society” and not see the downside to that.

    The extreme of either is bad. SoCalMan said this a bit, but I think it is even more important than that, BIGGER, if you will. A balance is necessary, and lest anyone buy into the feminist crap, most of history shows a balance. It is when it gets to either extreme that societies collapse.

    Lots of folks over the years have tried to figure out what went wrong in Germany… what was going on in their society that they dismissed the canaries falling dead around them, to allow them to buy into National Socialism.

    People have said “It was a Patriarchal society” and it was (therefore), a problem with men being dominant… that women and children had become subservient to men.

    There is truth in that, but there’s a bigger story, and more important history about how Hitler accomplished the transformation.

    He appealed to women… Hitler forced the extreme to go from one to the other.

    He spoke to and directed his speeches TO WOMEN, not to men. It is hard for us to understand this today, looking at this crazy/goofy looking little man, and understand how women (and girls) adored him. He was as popular as a rock star.

    He played into women’s worst fears about the decadence that was pervading the cities, the dangers that posed for them and their children, the disrespect for the patriarchal society. He created the ideal of the Man Bully, and women swooned (because women are attracted to power, even if that power is self destructive or cruel).

    Hitler himself was raised in a female dominant household, with an abusive but (for all intents and purposes) absentee father.

    The first laws he passed were nanny laws–about taking care of children, of eliminating the decadence of the cities (in favor of the simple, idyllic country life). And then he piled them on, more and more laws which controlled what men may do, and the women of Germany cheered him on. He treated Germany the way that a woman treats the household–putting everyone to work, and bringing order to chaos.

    The fact that anyone could get away with calling German society chaotic has GOT to be a clue that something was not right in Denmark Germany.

    Women don’t have to have the vote to control a society, as Germany demonstrates.

    It was the shift to nannyism where Hitler won and rose to totalitarian control… then it was simply paperwork, to suspend the last remaining shreds of democracy.

    I’ve simplified all of this, of course, but a thorough understanding of what happened in Hitler’s Germany is a chilling reminder of what can happen when we achieve either extreme… a period of history that must be studied and understood, lest we are doomed to repeat it.

    Matriarchs are DANGEROUS.

  16. Unregistered Comment by Uchuck the Tuchuck

    I cannot be as erudite as Mrs DuToit, but I can answer the question “What’s in YOUR Wallet?” It sure as Hell ain’t Capital One, after their long series of “Dad’s a moron” commercials. They are only one of a number of folks that I will not do business with for this very reason.

  17. LC HJ Caveman82952 Comment by LC HJ Caveman82952

    Folks have asked those such as I why we are the way we are…..the following link would be my answer. My dad…..they say it’s worth a thousand words….the takeoff roll is quite impressive, from inside the B-17. I admired him, the Nazis couldn’t break him, although they almost killed him. And those words in my mind….I want to be like him…
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anNRuOonsek

  18. Radical Redneck Comment by Radical Redneck

    For those of you concerned that Britain is becoming pussified and dhimmi, see how this unabashed and erudite Londoner Michael Hodges celebrates British culture and tradition.

  19. LC JackBoot IC/A-OBR Comment by LC JackBoot IC/A-OBR

    It sounds like someone is feeling threatened.

    I think what you are describing is the shift from a patriarch society to a matriarch society.

    I am trying to figure out what is so terrifying about that.

    Just the latest in the loony-left playbook. Characterize our views of terrorism, illegal immigration or in this case societal shift as things we are afraid of. Cast us as paranoid or delusional in order to be dismissive of legitimate concerns, so we defend ourselves instead of debating their lack of comprehension of a real threat.

    They like saying we are afraid, because it hides the fact that they are the ones afraid in reality.

  20. LC HJ Caveman82952 Comment by LC HJ Caveman82952

    Somehow this debate brings to mind a link….
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRHNv-vxHb0

  21. DJ Allyn,  ITW Comment by DJ Allyn, ITW

    I wasn’t insiuating that it was moving from one extreme to the other, only that it has been moving towards a patriarch to a matriarch society.

    I see nothing wrong with that. I am all for the “middle ground”. I don’t believe that man or woman is superior over the other.

    I am not threatened by a strong woman any more than I am threatened by a strong man.

    If a person, regardless of his or her gender chooses to be submissive to their opposite gender, then who cares? It certainly doesn’t effect how I live my life. I am very secure in my gender.

  22. baslimthecripple Comment by baslimthecripple

    Do you know how that crap got started? By a bunch of whining, nagging shrews that couldn’t get a real man to touch them with someone else’s dick. No real man in his right mind would have anything to do with such harridans…

    Have anyone in mind, LC Mrs. M-ITT? Cause it sure sounds like Hillary Clinton to me. Saw a post elsewhere fatuously pondering whether American was ready for a woman President- ABC or some sorry bunch of wankers like that. My first thought was, well ask me when one is running. But a better one is ask, me when a complete woman is running and not just the naughty bits.

  23. Tsubaki Shijuro Comment by Tsubaki Shijuro

    If you want to read some excellent depictions of real men (and real women, as well), read Louis L’Amour. Tough, honorable, intelligent, masculine men, and tough honorable, intelligent, feminine women. Spending all day on a university campus surrounded by some of the most wussified men and overbearing women in the world, the sanity and common sense of L’Amour’s simple, straightforward stories is not just refreshing. It’s revitalizing.

  24. Unregistered Comment by LC Elchonon, Imperial Chief of Civil Disobedience

    Damn was just saying this today to my “2nd mom” I dated her daughter a while back but it didnt work out but they love me so yeah.

    That I see no reason to “act macho” its usualy faggot sisy’s that think they are macho.. me i just sit there with my hand on the gun handle smiling..

    I am polite, i love kids and kids love me.. i’ll get dirty and dont give a shit..

    A good idea of the pussyfication of the male would be live free or die hard 4…

    He no longer smokes, his fellow hero is a femme guy, and when he kills the asian bitch the bad dude looks as if he will cry when john tells him over the comp…

    Thats one thing I love abut israel, the guys are macho.. your right I feel more advantaged in a pussy society in america where I can just shove a bunch of shitheads around.. but I love the fast paced competitive life style..

    I love giving the mouth, if someone.. ANYONE tells me something like the bus driver says to me as he did the other day “move to the back of the bus” I shot back “yeah genius ? where the fuck am I supposed to go? dont you see its full? if you have such bad vision why the fuck are you even drivin this piece of shit” and he grunted and didnt pick up any more passangers.

    Maybe thats why DJ dont live here no more ? he cant stand sticking up for himself ? if you dont fight back your a “friar” a sucker and you will get taken advantage of.

    Thats not to say that the society here is bad, people will help you in whatever even total strangers.. but dont like pussy’s…

  25. Merc, Imperial SomethingorOther Comment by Merc, Imperial SomethingorOther

    What happened to all the buttons for posting comments?

  26. Unregistered Comment by LC Elchonon, Imperial Chief of Civil Disobedience

    And I had these kids pick on me on the city bus home from school, damn right I took the city bus to school myself in miami starting at age 9.. you better grow a pair if you dont already have one.. my grandpa says “just sock the kid in the face and he’ll never bother you again” worked like a charm.. never had my yarmulka snatched again.

    In new york I have friends, big family they have 10 boys and 2 girls.. the boys are all big and strong and macho.. anyways so i used to crack this joke “your mama she so fat.. dat bitch in 2 different zip codes” so my buddy chaim repeats it.. anyways his dad stops me one day and says “my wfe in 2 different zip codes eh?” and chuckles..

    I dont really get the whole “stop trying to be cool” line.. I mostly act myself if i did i’d just retort “aight nows a good time to go fuck yourself”

  27. DJ Allyn,  ITW Comment by DJ Allyn, ITW

    Just the latest in the loony-left playbook.

    We have a playbook now? Gee, and all this time I thought Liberal/Progressives were like trying to herd cats.

    Newsflash: Whereas todays Conservatives make up such a narrow segment of our society, the rest of us are fairly wide open. We can’t even agree amongst ourselves when a farkin’ primary should be held, what makes you think we are organized enough to have a “playbook”? (We’d have arguments on whether to use recycled paper or hemp)

    L’Amour’s simple, straightforward stories is not just refreshing. It’s revitalizing.

    And Fiction. The myth versus the reality.

    What happened to all the buttons for posting comments?

    I dunno, how did you post that comment?

  28. psychochick Comment by psychochick

    forgive me if this is a tangent. It is a reply to an earlier post, and my head will explode if I don’t respond

    Fanusi
    You’re probably long gone, but get a grip. The reason there was a push to include women in the sciences was to let the qualified ones pursue their intellectual interests. I’ve seen where you’re at on your web site, and it’s a great university. I’m at a way higher level in biology than you, though, and only once have I seen a woman scientist with no intellectual curiousity (she did not progress any higher). (I have read somethings that argue that women aren’t as bad at mathematics as was thought, but I don’t remember the studies clearly, and I don’t want to argue that.) I took extra statistics classes as an undergrad because I enjoyed them. Now, I am weak on high-level mathematics, but so what? I can still process the data from my enzyme assays. That is incredibly clueless and idiotic to imply that women don’t have that vicelike grip on their projects that men do in biology. (at least in the US) I used to think you were really bright, and you probably are–but think about your opinions logically. Personally, I don’t want more of any particular gender–I want the best that is out there.

  29. LC SkyeChild G.L.O.R. Comment by LC SkyeChild G.L.O.R.

    While I agree with most of what Kim said, I have to take issue with dog- and cock-fighting as being part of “being a man.” Sorry, but I don’t see cruelty as a “manly” feature.

    There is only ONE male in my family who would be all right with this…and he used to harass and tease the cat till she got so upset with him she started peeing under his desk. My main regret is that our dogs didn’t haul off and bite him when he teased them.

    I see nothing unmanly about gentleness towards animals.

  30. LC SkyeChild G.L.O.R. Comment by LC SkyeChild G.L.O.R.

    PC,

    In my university, we have two women and one man in the sciences. Conversly, in the English department, we had two men and one woman. I COULD be snarky and say that perhaps men aren’t smart enough to be in the sciences. :em93: Fortunately, all of our instructors are very good in their areas.

    Personally, I don’t care either way, as long as the person knows the subject.

  31. psychochick Comment by psychochick

    DJ
    I know you work really hard at the site, but RED? It’s such a horrid color. Or is it because I have this strange brand of computer?

  32. Unregistered Comment by ballistic

    SkyeChild:

    I see nothing unmanly about gentleness towards animals.

    You’re absolutely right. A real man would never take pleasure in the suffering of weaker creatures (Unless they desperately deserved it, of course.).

    Compassion and kindness are the hallmarks of real men, but those should never be construed as weakness, because they aren’t. A real man sticks up for those that can’t help themselves, and critters fit that bill. They don’t have the ability to reason such as humans do, and thus can’t help themselves, until they’re provoked to defend themselves with a bite or scratch.

  33. DJ Allyn,  ITW Comment by DJ Allyn, ITW

    I know you work really hard at the site, but RED? It’s such a horrid color. Or is it because I have this strange brand of computer?

    What red? You see red? Red what?

    Describe, please.

    If I had a Mac (if I had a reason to cut off three of my fingers) I would be able to test it.

    Maybe this will annoy NerbyGirl so that she can call me nasty names again and tell me how much of an idiot I am.

    (of course, none of us using a REAL computer are having these problems) :em99:

    But yes, PC, send me a screen shot via email so I know what you are talking about…

  34. Tsubaki Shijuro Comment by Tsubaki Shijuro

    >And Fiction. The myth versus the reality.

    Ah, so apparently fiction can’t be realistic (I’m not saying “real” as in a simple account of historical events, but “realistic,” which is something entirely different) and portray types of human which actually existed at a certain time in a certain place…

    Essentially, your statement does one of two things:

    1) It relegates all fiction literature to the role of empty entertainment with no basis in, or relevance to, real life.

    or

    2) It exhibits your complete lack of understanding of the nature, role, and meaning of fiction literature.

    I feel compelled to assume the latter, but then, my profession does make me a bit biased in favor of a more significant role for literature than empty entertainment.

    (And don’t worry. I won’t embarrass you by asking you about any of L’Amour’s books, since I would be startled to the point of vomiting–projectile, not simple flowing–if I were to find out that you were not completely ignorant of the content of any of them.)

    If you knew anything at all about Mr. L’Amour’s work, you would know that he was a thorough student of the history of the American West throughout his life, and that he understood very well the type of men and women who pioneered it. His characters are fictional, of course, but that does not change the fact that they are excellent literary examples of both masculine and feminine strength.

    But I guess it doesn’t really matter, because it is brilliantly clear from your posts on this thread and on other threads that you have a rather intense and obsessive aversion to men being masculine, and if that’s the way you want to swing, hey, that’s your choice! We’ve all got things to deal with in life, and it is true that some men have a fear of masculine strength, and the responsibility and sacrifice which comes with it. I don’t envy you, and I certainly wish you the best of luck as you strive to overcome that handicap.

  35. psychochick Comment by psychochick

    DJ
    Rushing through cyberspace and actually a wonderful distraction from legal paperwork for a medical lawsuit.

  36. chuck Comment by chuck

    DJ,
    Just when I get to enjoying argueing with you, you have to go making fun of Mac users and I gain all kinds of new respect for you.

    http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=macs_cant

  37. DJ Allyn,  ITW Comment by DJ Allyn, ITW

    Just when I get to enjoying argueing with you, you have to go making fun of Mac users and I gain all kinds of new respect for you.

    Chuck, that is one of my favorite sites when I need a good laugh.

    Rushing through cyberspace and actually a wonderful distraction from legal paperwork for a medical lawsuit.

    I got it. I knew there was a reason why I didn’t have one of those machines. Each time I see screenshots like that it reminds me.

    Safari is NOT a standards-compliant browser. You are already at a major disadvantage having a machine where there is a very small selection of software available for it. Safari takes that same theme and will only render about half the web pages out there in the way they were meant to be read.

    Switch to Firefox for Mac.

    I have a friend of mine who makes fish aquariums out of old Macs. It is far more useful as that.

  38. LC RobertHuntingdon Comment by LC RobertHuntingdon

    Kim is pretty close on this. Not quite but then nobody’s ever 100% correct. It’s theoretically possible for somebody to be 100% wrong but even Deej doesn’t usually get that far off base… :em93:

    Anyway, something that made me think of this post again today was I remembered a movie I saw some time ago. It was a pretty average movie as far as acting and such, but it showed the obvious end of taking this to the “new” extreme — complete matriarchal society in which men don’t even exist anymore (reproduction is by cloning) except for in a very few isolated enclaves that literally forted up in fear of their lives and dying out quickly. When you look at it not on its merits as entertainment but as political satire it’s a much better movie. I think it was call “The Last Man on Earth” or something like that.

    Like most things, balance is the key. Men and women’s strengths and weaknesses are supposed to compliment each other. And when thought of as a partnership rather than a war, the sum is greater than the parts. Pity so many seem to have trouble figuring that out.

    RH

  39. kwongdzu Comment by kwongdzu

    I’ll probably get blasted on this, but if I followed the argument correctly the crumbling of our nation’s backbone began with the suffrage movement. Subsequently, women became involved in politics and our nation became more feminized as a result. Perhaps there is an element of this, but I would put the nancification down to liberalism, rather than the inclusion of women in government.

    Indeed, I would argue that a society that denies half of its populace a voice and participation in governance is subhuman and medieval. In other words, it is what we are up against. But do we wish to devolve to that? We don’t have to, but we do have to have the realism to recognize what we are facing and to fight it in a way that is forceful and effective. And one of our tactics should be to enlighten their women to the desireability and possibility of living in a civilized world free of the burden that is Islam. In other words, we should encourage the proselytizing of peaceful religions and perhaps even secularism. We should promote the idea that women are of equal worth to men. And in this society, we should recognize and begin to promote the idea that men are of equal worth to women. We should be complementary, rather than divisive. Basically, we all need to become Spartans (ok, Spartan women didn’t vote, so we won’t go that far - but it wouldn’t hurt to adopt a little of the attitude!).

    I blame liberalism for weakening our sense of national pride and unity, and thereby our resolve. I blame it for creating gender competition, rather than cooperation. The trend toward smaller families, even childlessness (which liberals seem to encourage), means people have less invested in the future of the country, and are therefore more apathetic. Speaking from my own experience, I can say that the women I know who have children are far more involved and interested in such issues as immigration and national defense. On issues of homeland security, they seem more aggressive than those who do not have an investment in the next generation. We need to exalt the family as an American ideal again, if we are to have a future. It is “for the children”, to use that unfortunately irritating phrase!

    And Kim, I know you know we are not all castrating bitches. You tell us what “men” are, and ask to know what makes women tick. I can’t speak for all women, but I can explain myself. I’m a wife and the mother of a daughter and three sons. How anyone can look at their children and believe that one is more valuable than another escapes me. How anyone can believe that one gender is superior is ridiculous to me. Of course they are different, and they shouldn’t strive to be the same! One can’t survive without the other, so both are obviously of equal worth. In a society where either one is subservient, half of the population lives in misery.

    I remember as a kid being in favor of the feminist movement. I thought it was all about equal pay for equal work, and that seemed only fair to me. To my way of thinking, that is where it should have begun and ended. The notion that men have to lose so that women can gain is wrong. I am horrified at the social damage that has been caused by feminists. Who has gained from the destruction of the family? Nobody, except for those who would wish to destroy us.

  40. Unregistered Comment by mindy1

    Boy, now there’s a guy who is not afraid to say what he means-not sure I agree 100%, but I think he’s right about women still wanting strong men-that’s why the FDNY calender is such a hot item for NY women to buy. I do think men should have their own things, but I do hope he allows for strong women, and I don’t mean the castrating type he insults. :em95:

  41. Unregistered Comment by mrsdutoit

    by LC SkyeChild G.L.O.R.
    While I agree with most of what Kim said, I have to take issue with dog- and cock-fighting as being part of “being a man.” Sorry, but I don’t see cruelty as a “manly” feature.

    I learned from experience on that post that leaving misconceptions around might not be wise.

    From the original post:

    Which is why women are trying to get dog-fighting and cock-fighting banned—they’d ban boxing too, if they could—because it’s “mean and cruel”. No shit, Shirley. Hell, I don’t like the idea of fighting dogs, either, but I don’t have a problem with men who do. Dogs and cocks fight. So do men. No wonder we have an affinity for it.

    Important point: “Hell, I don’t like the idea of fighting dogs, either…”

    Understanding why some men are attracted to something doesn’t mean you support, condone, or would do it yourself.

  42. LC SkyeChild G.L.O.R. Comment by LC SkyeChild G.L.O.R.

    And this is another point:

    but I don’t have a problem with men who do. Dogs and cocks fight. So do men.

    Some men beat their wives and children, too. Does Kim not have a problem with them, as well? Defenseless is defenseless, whether it be a dog, woman, or child. Kim is entitled to his opinion. As I said, I don’t consider it manly to pit one animal against another.

  43. Unregistered Comment by Uchuck the Tuchuck

    Baslim! I heard you had been shortened by the Sargon’s boys in Jubbalpore! How’d you get out of that one?

  44. DJ Allyn,  ITW Comment by DJ Allyn, ITW

    Hell, I don’t like the idea of fighting dogs, either, but I don’t have a problem with men who do. Dogs and cocks fight. So do men.

    So men are no better than animals?

    Getting back to our “pussification”, I hate to break it to all of you, but men share a chromosome with women - the x chromosome. It seems like we are already playing from a stacked deck.

    Besides, I don’t think men are becoming “feminized” I think women are becoming more masculine. Case in point: Rosie O’Donnell.

  45. kwongdzu Comment by kwongdzu

    Fanusi: Thanks for restating your views. I agree 100% with what you are saying. Insisting that women should be equally represented in the “sciences”, has the same crappifying effect as affirmative action in the workplace. If students are admitted into programs based on gender quotas, everyone will lose from the dummying down that results. I think you and PC are actually in agreement.

  46. Unregistered Comment by LC Staci GBOR

    I agree 100% with Fanusi. And this comes from one of those women who are an exception…I’m personally more mathematically inclined.

    The article…I agree 100% with Kim. Misha blogged on this article that my pastor Doug Giles wrote on townhall around a year back. I forwarded this post and Kim’s as well. I know he will like it.

    He currently just finished a three week series on Biblical lessons that could be derived from that movie 300. The first week was about raising children, the second on being a man, the third on being a woman.

    One thing he pointed out that Kim did as well is how our society today seems to want to get rid of the “good vs evil” and make excuses and explain the evil. THAT is a huge reason why people seem to be able to not realize we are fighting a very evil force out there.

    The last thing I would want is a matriarch type society. No way, no how. Modern day feminists suck. Metrosexuals suck. I have no issues letting men be men. And dead on when it comes to the pussifying of men in commercials. Steve H over at hogonice addressed this pretty good as well.

  47. Unregistered Comment by mrsdutoit

    Some men beat their wives and children, too. Does Kim not have a problem with them, as well? Defenseless is defenseless, whether it be a dog, woman, or child. Kim is entitled to his opinion. As I said, I don’t consider it manly to pit one animal against another.

    Neither does Kim. You’re reading intent/meaning that is not there. I don’t know how much more plainly I could say to you that you are MISREADING.

    Men fight and are attracted to fighting, is his point.

    There is nothing there that suggests that Kim is suggesting that “real men engage in dog fighting.” He finds it morally reprehensible. He understands what appeals to men about it, ie, the fighting/combat thing. He also said that women are attracted to gangster rappers, but that too is an example of extreme, undisciplined behavior, without the civilizing and controlling influence of other REAL MEN to channel that aggression/fighting into something positive.

  48. psychochick Comment by psychochick

    Fanusi
    Thanks for your reclarification–I totally agree with it.

    You talked primarily about mathematics, but you had also said

    ” However, my specialisations - in such stuff as statistics and molecular biology - landed me with more men than women. It’s the way we are.”

    The molecular biology comment is what led me to think you were also talking about biology, since it is such a major specialty in the field.

  49. Unregistered Comment by Americhristian

    Ok, I know this is so far down on the list of comments most people won’t see it, and it’s gonna be LONG, but I need to write this as a guy who considers himself a Real Man.
    As my name implies I am a firm Christian and I believe God put everything a male needs to be a Real Man inside him. As previously noted by Kim and others, society today frequently steps on that, but society as a whole can be counteracted by one other Real Man, and that is usually Dad. It may not even be biological Dad and just a father figure but that’s all it takes. Consider that if you want your sons to be Real Men, but I digress. The problem is there are not just two classifications of men, there are three:

    1) Wimps (their innumerable issues have already been talked about!)
    2) Instinctual Men (or Partial Men)
    3) Real Men

    I won’t go into why being a wimp is bad, that would really be liquefying the dead horse, so let me hit on what I believe the difference between the other two is. First, the Instinctual Man. This man has realized, consciously or not, that being a Wimp is a Bad Thing. This is the guy’s guy. He takes no crap, embraces his aggressive tendencies and generally has a lot of confidence in himself. He regards those weaker than him very little and seeks to become stronger than those stronger than him. He is very competitive. He has some friends but they are few and never completely trusted. The problem with the Instinctual Man, is that contrary to what he and many others think, he is still NOT A REAL MAN! Oh hes certainly a step up from the Wimp, but he is nothing but a physical embodiment of his instincts and urges, with no shaping at all.
    There is a vast difference between the Instinctual Man and the Real Man. The Real man can choose to be gentle because (if he so desires) he does not have not have to be rough unless the situation demands it. As quoted in the movie Road House “Be nice until it is time to stop being nice.” The Real Man is truly confident, not arrogant. The Real Man will always, always protect and help those weaker than he is. The real man does not shun violence, nor does he revel in it. I enjoy watching mixed martial arts on TV because it is in a controlled environment, if I saw two guys whooping on each other like that in the street, I would probably be calling the cops.
    The real man loves his wife and children more than himself. Certain “Christian” chauvinists quote Ephesians 5:22:
    Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord.
    and totally what is says a few verses later in 5:25:
    Husbands, love your wives, just as Christ also loved the church and gave Himself for her…
    We as men are called to have the same love for our wives that Christ had when he died for all of us.
    The Real Man hates very little, but the one thing he hates above all else is men who prey on those who are weaker than him. That does not have to mean criminally, but physically emotionally or verbally as well. He doesn’t even really hate the Wimps, until they get in his way too often.
    Burping out loud and scratching ourselves in public while we whistle at chicks doesn’t make us Real Men, it makes us Neanderthals and only mildly better than wimps. If you want to truly be a real man consider the killer whale. It loves to play with humans and dolphins, and very rarely hurts anything it isn’t trying to kill. It doesn’t do that because it’s weak, it does it because it’s the baddest mother in the ocean and it knows it.
    This was a very long comment, I know, but I had to get that out.
    Let me know what ya’ll think
    **AmeriChristian**

  50. DJ Allyn,  ITW Comment by DJ Allyn, ITW

    I find the terms “real man”, “intellectual man”, and “wimp” to be subjective. I am sure that there are many “wimps” out there who like to think of themselves as “real men”, and vice-versa.

    Me? I am just a man. I appear real — I am real to myself and others, and whether I choose to be macho or not is up to me. I march to my own drummer, and my boat floats because it is what I want it to do.

    I don’t have to be aggressive to prove I am tough. I can get what I want by being assertive, not aggressive.

    I don’t go looking for fights, but I am liable to rip your head off and shit down your windpipe if provoked. Not much scares me, but I am not foolish enough not to respect certain dangers.

    I don’t belittle other people simply for the sake of doing so — I usually have a lot of tolerance for people who are different than me, but under certain situations where another person is deliberately pushing my buttons, I might respond in kind.

    Nobody can make me mad, happy, glad, sad or any other emotion. Only I can make myself respond that way by my choice.

  51. MegaTroopX Comment by MegaTroopX

    And one other thing that doesn’t get mentioned is something that gets my blood boiling. The phrase:

    “We need more women in the sciences”.

    No sweetie, we do not. What we need in the sciences are more hardworking, insanely dedicated, tough hombres who love the field like life itself.

    Well said, Fanusi. That’s what some people can’t seem to get. You can only provide the chance for everyone that wants it, and is willing to sweat for it.

    This business of bean-counting categories to keep things “fair” results in an inferior product.

    If there aren’t “enough” (insert group here) in a given field, maybe it’s because “enough” aren’t trying out, or qualifying if they do?

    To illustrate, let’s say a new field, we’ll use “Space-Time Warping Physics” starts up. The genesis of a new field isn’t hard to believe, as it happens all the time.

    Anyway, let’s say there are 100 first people who do the intensive initial studies, develop the protocols that future studiers of the field will use, and go on to become experts. Of those, 80 are men, and 20 are women.

    Along comes the bean-counter (usually a journo or professionally offended dipshit, you know the ones). They start screaming about how women are “underrepresented” in Space-Time Warping Physics and Something Must Be Done™.

    [Sorry, Troop.  That one just screamed for a trademark. (grin)  -The Management™]

    Now, are there only 20 women because some sinister cabal tried to keep them out? No, there are only 20 women, because ONLY 20 SHOWED UP!!

    To review: Equality of opportunities, needed. Equality of results: not guaranteed, and any attempt to do so is near-certain to be a disaster.

    Short of some horrible caste system where people are sorted into every field by category in an attempt to be “proportionate”, you will never get results to please the bean-counters. Not to mention that the output of such a system would be vastly inferior to a system where people can pursue their passions freely.

  52. MegaTroopX Comment by MegaTroopX

    Hey Deej, the “RSS for Comments” doohickey is jacked up.

  53. LC Cheapshot911, Dept. of Redneck Tech Comment by LC Cheapshot911, Dept. of Redneck Tech

    Noble thoughts, for sure..

    Now here’s a view from a not-so-devoted atheist.
    ‘Not- so-devoted, so’s I can change my entire philosophy if new compelling evidence arises, without embarrasement or pain.

    Being human, I figure error is always a possibility.

    Not so the others.

    Total devotion ruins the discovery/analysis process, holding onto cherished beliefs in the face of opposing evidence can produce crazy stress.

    I understand the mental stability folks seek when they do that, ‘proud to defend their faith from a buncha geeks with lab-coats and clipboards,,,and ‘understand the stress they face when they meet folks like me who refuse to kneel to the mythical.

    Well,
    Mother nature eliminates entire species who resist evolution.

    The more devout the spiritual folks are, the more they tend to fight scientific enlightenment.
    Real men don’t fight knowledge, but embrace it.

    If to be a man, ya gotta believe that spirituality is the same as reality, just call me Peter Pan.

    The first lesson in freedom includes a course in recognizing and dealing with peer pressure, tha devil’s playground.
    Real Men can buy their buddy’s a beer on Sunday.

  54. psychochick Comment by psychochick

    Mega
    It’s the “tough hombres” that annoys me, not an expectation to be dedicated and work hard. By definition “hombres’ means men (def: A man; a fellow.), not the most qualified person.

  55. LC SkyeChild G.L.O.R. Comment by LC SkyeChild G.L.O.R.

    Fanusi,

    And when those science students know how to write properly, thank the humanities instructors.

  56. kwongdzu Comment by kwongdzu

    DJ: I’ve never heard of shitting down someone’s windpipe before, but that sounds quite unpleasant … I like!

  57. Unregistered Comment by CKO1986

    Anybody got a fire extinguisher they can lend me? Kim’s anger is red-hot it’s melting my CPU. :em93:

  58. LC Cheapshot911, Dept. of Redneck Tech Comment by LC Cheapshot911, Dept. of Redneck Tech

    DJ: I’ve never heard of shitting down someone’s windpipe before, but that sounds quite unpleasant … I like!

    There’s another part, something about simultaneously mating with the removed portion.

  59. LC Cheapshot911, Dept. of Redneck Tech Comment by LC Cheapshot911, Dept. of Redneck Tech

    Also, the guy that warns/threatens you will be less calculating than one whe smiles at ya,,with a flat eyebrow.

  60. MegaTroopX Comment by MegaTroopX

    It’s the “tough hombres” that annoys me, not an expectation to be dedicated and work hard. By definition “hombres’ means men (def: A man; a fellow.)

    I was direct-quoting. A lot of our language is imprecise.

    [Sorry, Troop. That one just screamed for a trademark. (grin) -The Management™]

    Perfectly fine. I’ll get that LC title yet!

  61. SoCalOilMan, LC Comment by SoCalOilMan, LC

    MegaTroopX

    I’ll get that LC title yet!

    It’s not a title that is bestowed, you claim it. If you want to be affiliated with the misfits and what-all you find here in the Empire, take the title.

    I don’t give a damn if you put in the front or hang it on the back. If you feel like this is home, you’re a LC.

    (oh, and the first round of beer for all LC’s and GLOR’s are on you.) :em99:

  62. psychochick Comment by psychochick

    Fanusi
    I didn’t want to post this earlier, since I thought it would be an invasion of your privacy, but since you ask:

    http://archives.betterhumans.com/Members/Fanusi Khiyal/Default.aspx

    By the way, there are only 2 people I have searched–both scientists, so I don’t want the site to think I’m some crusade to search people.

  63. psychochick Comment by psychochick

    F
    actually, I think there’s another one somewhere, but it’s very late, and I’m going to bail. Something gave me the impression that you were at O. Actually, I’m almost positive, but it was awhile ago, and some neurons just have such short life spans.

  64. DJ Allyn,  ITW Comment by DJ Allyn, ITW

    He currently just finished a three week series on Biblical lessons that could be derived from that movie 300. The first week was about raising children, the second on being a man, the third on being a woman.

    On a pseudo-factual movie? Why not the Simpsons Movie, or one of the Superman movies? Did he run out of lessons he could teach out of the Bible?

    To review: Equality of opportunities, needed. Equality of results: not guaranteed, and any attempt to do so is near-certain to be a disaster.

    I am with you about 95 percent on that. Some people balk at the equality of opportunities part. Usually, it involves the “____________ is no place for a woman” speech, with the word “woman” being interchanged with a variety of groups of people that someone wants to exclude.

    I don’t believe quotas are the way to go. I think that they were needed forty years ago just to get the pump primed, but things have changed now — women and different races have proved themselves.

    But there are still those out there who would take away opportunities if they could — and some do.

  65. Ten-Ten Comment by Ten-Ten

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNzZzsvOClc

    That pretty much sums it up.

  66. L.C. Rowane Comment by L.C. Rowane

    Really, there is no reason for all the verbiage, either you are a MAN and everyone knows it or you aren’t and everybody knows that. A MAN isn’t defined by words, but by actions.
    I guess y’all will just have to mark me as a “Neanderthal”

  67. DJ Allyn,  ITW Comment by DJ Allyn, ITW

    Wow, do you feel all the testosterone here? I half expect people to start talking in their Monster-truck announcer voices. :em99:

  68. Tsubaki Shijuro Comment by Tsubaki Shijuro

    >do you feel all the testosterone here?

    It’s okay. You don’t need to be afraid.

  69. DJ Allyn,  ITW Comment by DJ Allyn, ITW

    I suppose it is a damn good thing I am not in a stall in the men’s room at the Minneapolis airport. :em99:

  70. Emperor Misha I Comment by Emperor Misha I

    I suppose it is a damn good thing I am not in a stall in the men’s room at the Minneapolis airport. :em99:

    Would you quit tapping your damn feet, Deej? :lol:

  71. DJ Allyn,  ITW Comment by DJ Allyn, ITW

    But I have such a “wide stance”!

    Besides, I am listening to a Liza Minnelli show tune on my iPod, and so I can’t stop tapping my feet. :lol:

    BTW: Here is the arrest complaint (pdf) in case you wonder if Craig’s explanation of the events is credible…

  72. LC Cheapshot911, Dept. of Redneck Tech Comment by LC Cheapshot911, Dept. of Redneck Tech

    Wow, do you feel all the testosterone here? I half expect people to start talking in their Monster-truck announcer voices.

    One o’ them mornin’ yakker’s with big zonga’s was obviously tired of man-talk on one show, said “I’m just awash in testosterone here”,,
    I wish I could remember who the guy was that shot right back- “You ain’t worried ’bout drownin’ with that floatation are ya?”

  73. LC Wil Comment by LC Wil

    “You ain’t worried ’bout drownin’ with that floatation are ya?”

    :em99: :em99: :em99: :em99: :em99: :em99: :em99: :em99: :em99: :em99: :em99: :em99: :em99:

  74. LC NCLivingBrit Comment by LC NCLivingBrit

    This Sunday SUNday SUNDAY! at the Carson City fairgrounds, Big Daddy Don Bodeens truck, the Boheemeth!

    Tickets only $10, kids get in for five! SUNDAY! SUNDAY! SUNDAYYYYYYYYY!

    If I was going to have a Voice, I’d rather it be that trailer guy.

    “In a home without Cheeto’s, one man puts down the mouse and blazes a trail to….. Food Lion.”

    Kickass.

  75. WayneB Comment by WayneB

    NCLivingBrit - The name Food Lion gives me nightmares, because I once worked for a company who printed a large order of refrigerator magnets for them. Ordinarily, no big deal, but the die cutters misregistered them, so two of us spent two days going through 100,000 of them by hand, picking out the ones which were close enough to pass.

    We passed a little less than 25%, then we had to print replacements for the rest.

  76. LC Cheapshot911, Dept. of Redneck Tech Comment by LC Cheapshot911, Dept. of Redneck Tech

    O Reily is gonna get de-pussified!
    Tha Nuge will be there t’nite.
    Body armor won’t help ol’ Bill this time.

    ‘Reckon The Rant got somebody’s attention?

  77. hOOt Gibson Comment by hOOt Gibson

    The Pussification of the Western Male…..

    INSERT PHOTO OF BJ ALLYN….

    There you have it gang.

    hOOt

  78. jaybear Comment by jaybear

    Is this considered to be lewd behavior in a public restroom?

  79. DJ Allyn,  ITW Comment by DJ Allyn, ITW

    You know, frOOt, real men don’t sell wolf tickets like you do, from the safety of your bedroom or where ever it is you sit in the dark checking out porn sites and dropping those great pearls of wisdom you do on this site.

    You are out of your league here on this site. Other than the occasional “me too” comment you make there, you have no game or skills.

    You are a nebbish putz and a schmuck.


    Click to see the real pussy

  80. LC SkyeChild G.L.O.R. Comment by LC SkyeChild G.L.O.R.

    What is this snapshot thingy?

  81. hOOt Gibson Comment by hOOt Gibson

    DJ….for all the BS,…hope your tests go well.

    hOOt