Archive for the “Dhimmitude” Category
Sweet, Sweating Jehosaphat on a Hybrid-Powered Pogo Stick. It’s getting to the point where making fun of formerly “great” Britain isn’t even fun anymore:
ISLAMIC law has been officially adopted in Britain, with sharia courts given powers to rule on Muslim civil cases.
The government has quietly sanctioned the powers for sharia judges to rule on cases ranging from divorce and financial disputes to those involving domestic violence.
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE??? We mean, the mere notion that any of those areas should be covered by ANY law but British law is disgusting in the extreme, but DOMESTIC VIOLENCE?
Oh yes, we’re sure that the Religion of Honor Killings will come up with some perfectly wonderful rulings on domestic violence cases, rulings that will further serve to highlight Britain as a beacon of equal justice for all.
Rulings issued by a network of five sharia courts are enforceable with the full power of the judicial system, through the county courts or High Court.
There are concerns that women who agree to go to tribunal courts are getting worse deals because Islamic law favours men.
Ya think? How, how un-nuanced of you, you evil, wicked, prejudiced bigots.
Siddiqi said that in a recent inheritance dispute handled by the court in Nuneaton, the estate of a Midlands man was divided between three daughters and two sons.
The judges on the panel gave the sons twice as much as the daughters, in accordance with sharia. Had the family gone to a normal British court, the daughters would have got equal amounts.
We’re amazed that they got anything at all. And we’re sure that the sons got their father’s “favorite” goats too.
In the six cases of domestic violence, Siddiqi said the judges ordered the husbands to take anger management classes and mentoring from community elders. There was no further punishment.
Which, one has to admit, is a huge step forward from real sharia “law”, under which they’d most likely have been dragged outside and stoned as the disobedient harlots that they doubtlessly, based on the unassailable testimony of the perpetrator, were.
In each case, the women subsequently withdrew the complaints they had lodged with the police and the police stopped their investigations.
I can’t possibly imagine why. It couldn’t be because they’d just realized that if they didn’t, their “husbands” would beat them once again, this time knowing that no punishment would ever come to them? Nah, let’s not be paranoid here.
Siddiqi said that in the domestic violence cases, the advantage was that marriages were saved and couples given a second chance.
Particularly so in the case of the violent asshats who, under any other kind of law, would have been s sent to jail for assault and battery. They now have a second chance to beat their wives up instead. O Britain, you must be so proud.
Inayat Bunglawala, assistant secretary-general of the Muslim Council of Britain, said: “The MCB supports these tribunals. If the Jewish courts are allowed to flourish, so must the sharia ones.”
We’re not so sure where we stand on Jewish courts either, since His Imperial Majesty is a firm believer in one, and ONLY one law for all, but we’re willing to bet you several jars of gefilte fish that they don’t usually let violent offenders off with “anger management.”
Besides, and obviously we’re ignorant of British law here, but since when did assault and battery come under civil law? We mean, really now?
Poor Britain. We’ll miss her.
35 Comments »
Only difference was the fucking venue.
Did that bribetaking IOC weasel call it “best ever”? No, I didn’t watch..no Jesse Owens.
The LameStream™ media had the chance of a lifetime to witness for themselves the benefits of the freedoms they take so much for fucking granted..and I damned well guarantee you next week, the same media hacks who have lived under the most hardcore censorship and totalitarian dictatorship of the last one hundred years…will be back home, bashing the US over some imagined slight.
London in four years? Will the Games be held close to the Great Mosque? Or will the events be stopped so everyone can turn and present their faces to Mecca five times a day? Will there be an Olympic anthem or will the only thing heard be the sound of the call to prayer?
How will it feel knowing that Big Brother will be monitoring every single word you say, every email you send, every call you make, dear IOC? Not that you give a rats ass, all you’re concerned about are the five star hotels and whatever it is you can get your greasy, greedy little paws on.
In the corruption sweepstakes, the IOC leaves the UN for dead. Kaffir Annan™ himself never aspired to such heights of venality.
OH yes, I almost forgot.For the women athletes…here’s a sneak preview of the fashions of 2012.
Have fun in Londonistan.
13 Comments »
…because we’ll be needing that particular phrase rather sooner than we’d thought, obviously (found at Stop the ACLU):
A police community support officer ordered two Christian preachers to stop handing out gospel leaflets in a predominantly Muslim area of
The evangelists say they were threatened with arrest for committing a “hate crime” and were told they risked being beaten up if they returned.
Wonderful! Handing out leaflets containing Christian materials is now a “hate crime” in Not-So-Great Britain. Add stonings and beheadings and Ol’ Albion will be exactly like Saudi Retardia. Minus the humongous oil reserves, that is. Oh, and the halfway decent weather.
Old King Arthur is now being used as an attic fan in Heaven, rotating at a rather impressive 4,000 rpms.
So this whole multi-culti, Nanny State Socialist Utopia Deal that you Brits so enthusiastically signed up for with NuLabour, how’s that working out for you again? We have to ask now, because we don’t know how to ask it in Arabic.
Give us more, O Emperor! »« AIIIEEEE! My EYES!
40 Comments »
By now our LCs being the news junkies we tend to be, know that the pathetic, pud-pulling, pea-wit from Plains, Jawjah is merrily planning another trip to negotiate with Hamasshole-In-Chief Khaled Meshaal, exiled in Syria.
US advises Carter against any meeting with Hamas
Of course, the Foggy Bottom Cretins come out with a limp-wristed statement ‘advising’ him against meeting with an officially declared Terrorist regime, but nonetheless is willing to help him with ‘arrangements’ for traveling to Syria.
Call me blunt, but why not “If you do this we’re taking your passport AND charging you under the Logan Act?” I’ve fucking well had it with former and present elected officials deciding that only their omniscient efforts can solve Every Problem In Teh World™ if we just sit down and have ANOTHER palaver with the enemy. Carter should have been smacked after his last trip abroad to Cuba to swap spit with Uncle Fidel. We have a State Department (biting my tongue here) that is supposed to handle these matters, so be a good boy and bugger-off Jimmah.
Would a former President have visited Hitler or Tojo during WW2, and if anyone actually had you can be sure a quick trial and the noose would be waiting for their return. We’re in the Long War with Islamofascists wherever they are, not just where we currently have American boots on the ground, so yes, he’s meeting with declared enemies of the United States, the West and in particular Israel.
This shriveled leftover circumcision meat, continues his unabashedly anti-semitic tradition of appeasement by demanding Medinat Yisrael continually surrender land lawfully acquired by acts of war against them AND demanding they exercise restraint in responding to thousands of ongoing rocket attacks into the territories. The word “Casus Belli” is obviously not in the appeasement-monkey’s vocabulary, but then fellow traveler in the “Elder Group” Kofi Annan hasn’t found a terrorist sugar-daddy he isn’t willing to fellate either for the right bling-bling.
We can always hope that his friend take him to a Katyusha Rocket launch demonstration and the boys and girls of the IDF return the favor….repeatedly.
34 Comments »
Seems someone decided to call O’l Screech Owl Rowan Dhimmi Williams on his Sharia bullshit.
Two protesters were arrested during the Archbishop of Canterbury’s Easter Sunday sermon, police said.
Two men with placards bearing the words “Support the persecuted church” and “No to Sharia law” stood in front of the pulpit at Canterbury Cathedral as Dr Rowan Williams began to speak, but were swiftly removed by officers.
Can’t have that now can we? I wonder if they were promptly beheaded? Oh, Sharia isn’t fully in effect yet? Sucks for the Archbishop of Canterbury, the rubes are still allowed to think for themselves.
The Archbishop used his Easter Sunday sermon to warn against nations’ greed for oil, power and territory.
Any guesses as to what countries he had in mind? You get a Kewpie doll if you guessed it ain’t the murdering 7th century savages he loves so dearly. Pretty obvious I guess. One ideology calls for death to the unbelievers and for world domination, while the other believes in freedom and liberty. Of course he needs to use the power of the pulpit to rail against western civilization. It’s a lot safer after all, the Hajis tend to kill people who disagree with them. Personal risk avoidance policy on his part I guess. In between belching Imam jizz, he spewed this;
“Individuals live in anxious and acquisitive ways, seizing what they can to provide a security that is bound to dissolve, because they are going to die,” he told worshippers.
And if he gets his way, it will be through being beheaded by a bunch of ululating goat molesters for daring to not grow their beards long enough.
And the two protesters are facing two years in jail for calling this bastard on his treason, treason not only to his country, but to his faith. How the hell can anyone follow a so called Christian leader who tells them to submit to the religion of the Anti-Christ?
To quote LC Fanusi from an earlier thread, we do need another Inquisition.
18 Comments »
Those of you who have been following the Canadian Thought Police’s persecution of Ezra Levant will no doubt be as delighted as we are to learn that the Gestapo goon they sent out has decided to resign from the case, now that she has become a target for well-deserved public derision and ridicule.
I mentioned that Shirlene McGovern, the “human rights officer” who interrogated me, has resigned from my case. The human rights commission advised my lawyer that McGovern quit because of the public backlash against the commission — and against her in particular. In other words, she didn’t like being called a censor in the blogosphere.
I’m not sympathetic. I believe that any government bureaucrat who makes a living interrogating citizens about their political beliefs ought to be held in public contempt. McGovern truly doesn’t get it — she thinks what she does for a living is perfectly bland, just like her.
So she leads a thought crime prosecution at the behest of a pisslamic sheik who got his rag in a knot over Ezra daring to exercise the rights of a free press by publishing the MoToons of Doom™, forcing him to spend a fortune defending himself while said sheik gets the whole thing free of charge, at the expense of the Canadian taxpayers, and then she has the nerve to whine about being made fun of?
Good riddance, bitch, and may your name forever be associated with the fascism of the feel-good, PC dhimmi left.
Where’s that Imperial Nanotech Violin again? Damn, if we don’t feel another sad song coming on.
Oh, there he is:
(H/t to our friends at Stop the ACLU)
16 Comments »
(Note: A big ass hat tip goes out to The MoxArgon Group for posting about this steaming cesspool of pig shit.)
The ArchIdiot of Canterbury™, one Rowan Williams, piles onto his already heaping mound of Demented Dhimmitude™.
We started to give this an Imperial Fisk o’ Doom™, but the amount of blinding idiocy contained within the article was just so astronomically high that we feared for the integrity of the Imperial CPU™, should it be entered into the system. Just linking to the article may well melt some of the lesser components.
Beware all ye who clicketh this linketh.
55 Comments »
Our Aussie Infidel, LC EFA, sends us sad news of our British brethren kickin’ in the turbos on their way to kneeling down and exposing their necks Allah’s Assholes™.
Ministers have adopted a new language for declarations on Islamic terrorism.
In future, fanatics will be referred to as pursuing “anti-Islamic activity”.
Yes, dear readers, you read that right. “Islamic fanatics” killing Infidels in the name of “Islam” are pursuing “anti-Islamic activity”.
We suppose the only question left to answer is “Are they INTENTIONALLY breeding their people to turn out this fuckin’ retarded?”
Home Secretary Jacqui Smith said that extremists were behaving contrary to their faith, rather than acting in the name of Islam.
Security officials believe that directly linking terrorism to Islam is inflammatory, and risks alienating mainstream Muslim opinion.
You mean THIS “mainstream Muslim opinion”, you drooling, daft bovine? (Apologies to drooling ungulates everywhere.)
In her first major speech on radicalisation, Miss Smith repeatedly used the phrase “anti-Islamic”.
In one passage she said: “As so many Muslims in the UK and across the world have pointed out, there is nothing Islamic about the wish to terrorise, nothing Islamic about plotting murder, pain and grief.
“Indeed, if anything, these actions are anti-Islamic’.
So, using this helmet-wearing fucktard’s “logic”, Adolf Hitler wasn’t really “anti-Semitic”, he was “anti-German”. Emperor Hirohito’s hordes who were raping, murdering and pillaging their way through China weren’t “anti-Chinese”, they were “anti-Japanese”. Miss Smith, even though we’re a Back-slidden Southern Baptgnostic™, we’d greatly appreciate it if you use the term “anti-Christian” the next time you and your fellow Socialist Succubi™ get together to discuss that little “incident” that we like to refer to as “The Inquisition“. After all, even though it was carried out under the auspices and authority of “mainstream Christians” of the day, they can’t be referred to as “Christians”, because then you’d “risk alienating mainstream Christian opinion”.
Then again, those murdering fuckheads carrying out The Inquisition actually WERE going against the teachings of the guy they were claiming to follow. The “anti-Islamists” are, in fact, following the direct teachings of their Pedophile Profit™. (Check out the first comment for a veritable cornucopia of Pieceful Pisslamic Love™. It’ll raise the ambient temperature of the various bi-valved mollusks of your cardial-pulmonary muscle.)
Now, Miss Smith, how ’bout you heeding the advice below?
39 Comments »
Some joker in Lewiston, Maine, decided to make fun of mohamhead by putting up a poster.
Now the local poh-lice is investigating it with an eye towards prosecuting the “guilty” parties of a “
thought hate crime.”
Would somebody tell us when the First Amendment was declared null and void? The usual suspects are howling about hate and racism, claiming that this is an insult of and offense to “all religions” and that it must be stopped, right now, lest we end up in dire straits indeed.
What? They’re going to start making fun of Christians next? Oh the horror of it, because surely that has never happened before.
So where were all of those bold, brave, principled Warriors of Good Taste and Religious Tolerance then? Where are the “hate crime” investigations for those? Don’t tell us, gasp, that there’s yet another case of double standards going on here?
Making fun of Jesus, the Virgin Mary and the Last Supper is perfectly OK, but Heaven forbid that anybody should poke fun at mohammed, because THAT is a true sign that the death camps can’t be very far away?
Kiss our Imperial Arse.
And no, we’re NOT saying that the anti-Christian examples that we mentioned above should be considered crimes or that the parties responsible should be prosecuted. Yes, they’re offensive to us. Quite a bit, actually. No, we don’t particularly like it when people ridicule and denigrate our faith but, and this is a HUGE but, the ones who did so had a perfectly good right to do so. We may consider them rude arseholes for exercising their right to make fun of our faith, but that doesn’t change the fact that they DO have such a right. That’s right: The First Amendment doesn’t guarantee your right to only say what other people agree that you should be allowed to say. Freedom of Speech isn’t about allowing speech that everybody already agrees with. Any idiot can be tolerant of something that he agrees with, the true test of Freedom of Speech is whether or not you’re prepared to allow speech that you find disgusting, offensive or just plain dumb.
We’ve said it before, and we’ll say it again: THERE ARE NO DEGREES OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH!
Either you have it, or you don’t have it. Obviously, some totalitarian fuckwits in this country would rather that we didn’t.
Go right ahead, morons, try to silence me. I laid down an Oath to the Constitution, and nothing and nobody, least of all a bunch of jackbooted swine, are going to make me renege on that oath. And if you try, I’ll have no choice but to explain the meaning of “against all enemies, foreign AND domestic” to you.
You won’t like my explanation very much. It’s loud and messy. And quite painful too. If I miss.
73 Comments »
Including Dhimmi Khadr’s, it would appear (link via LC & IB Vinnie):
Stephen Coughlin, the Pentagon specialist on Islamic law and Islamist extremism, has been fired from his position on the military’s Joint Staff. The action followed a report in this space last week revealing opposition to his work for the military by pro-Muslim officials within the office of Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England.
He had run afoul of a key aide to Mr. England, Hasham Islam, who confronted Mr. Coughlin during a meeting several weeks ago when Mr. Islam sought to have Mr. Coughlin soften his views on Islamist extremism.
So some Moon rock worshipping assistant deputy coffee maker whines about one of the Pentagon’s experts on pisslamic law and pisslamic extremism being “too hard on pisslamist extremism” and the Pentagon, being the camel-whipped PC pussies that they are, promptly go ahead and fire the expert???
Heaven help us!
Will the last person with a set of balls to leave the government please put down the toilet seat?
25 Comments »