You are viewing the

- 2008 Archives -

If you like sloppy seconds, this would be the page for you. All of the material you find here was posted over the course of 2008. All threads found in this archive are now closed and you cannot register, sign in, or comment.

Are you looking for the CURRENT VERSION of the Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler?

Grand Inquisitor Hansen is reportedly going to be calling for the jailing of the executives of Big Oiiiiiiil™ for their refusal to buy stock in his and The Great Goreacle’s™ snake oil swindle, when he addresses Congress The Whorehouse on the Potomac™ this week.

“James Hansen, one of the world’s leading climate scientists, will today call for the chief executives of large fossil fuel companies to be put on trial for high crimes against humanity and nature, accusing them of actively spreading doubt about global warming in the same way that tobacco companies blurred the links between smoking and cancer.

Hansen will use the symbolically charged 20th anniversary of his groundbreaking speech to the US Congress - in which he was among the first to sound the alarm over the reality of global warming - to argue that radical steps need to be taken immediately if the “perfect storm” of irreversible climate change is not to become inevitable.

Speaking before Congress again, he will accuse the chief executive officers of companies such as ExxonMobil and Peabody Energy of being fully aware of the disinformation about climate change they are spreading.”

It’s fast approaching the time when these EnviroNazi assholes will have crossed that thin line between “civil disagreement” and “full-blown ass-kickings”. (And we all know who’ll be on the losing end of THAT little skirmish.)

F.E.T.E.

21 Responses to “Speaking Of Torquemada…”
  1. DдrтH бдкфи Comment by DдrтH бдкфи UNITED STATES

    First.

    ObaMarx is going to help us all…by making our 401Ks tank when he destroys the evil corporations.

    All this dipshit’s brain-dead followers need to do is look north to Michigan, or west to Detroit, so they can see what happens when you try to ’save’ people money by taxing what few of them still remain productive citizens.

  2. TJ's Anti-Contrarian Blog Comment by TJ's Anti-Contrarian Blog

    Where does this fuckin’ numnuts live? Anybody know?

  3. B.C., Imperial Torturer™ Comment by B.C., Imperial Torturer™ UNITED STATES

    Where does this fuckin’ numnuts live? Anybody know?

    Waaaaaay over in the far reaches of the Stoopid Side of the Idiotarian Parallel Universal Divide™.

  4. larry Comment by larry UNITED STATES

    Wasn’t this the same butt-pirate that was predicting world destruction due to ice age way back in the 70’s?

    I think it was.

    Of course, he’s now trying to say that they just used his computer program and that he had nothing to do with it.

    In fact, do a search for “ice age prediction” and you will see a lot of distancing attempts. “We never said Ice Age! The MEDIA said Ice Age! It wasn’t US!!!”

    (but since we all know the media can’t think for itself, it must have gotten the idea somewhere.)

    Nothing to see here, folks. Move along.

  5. Unregistered Comment by mindy1 UNITED STATES

    :em98: Sheesh, he makes me feel sorry for an oil exec.

  6. LC cmblake6 Comment by LC cmblake6

    Reset? Did somebody say reset? Idiots all of these Goremorons. Fock!

  7. LC The Major, Imperial Misanthrope Comment by LC The Major, Imperial Misanthrope UNITED STATES

    Comment by B.C., Imperial Torturer™

    Where does this fuckin’ numnuts live? Anybody know?

    Glad you straightened me out on his location, BC! I thought this smug little, itty bitty, intellectually dishonest NASA prick inhabited a warped bubble in the space-time constipation near Uranus.


    A Smug Widdle Prick Look - He’d be more credible if he were doing THIS:

  8. LC SkyeChild G.L.O.R. Comment by LC SkyeChild G.L.O.R. UNITED STATES

    The scary part is that congress will probably consider the idea..even if just for a moment. Whatever happened to the concept of free speech? We aren’t free now to disbelieve in global warming?

  9. Unregistered Comment by curmudgeon1 UNITED STATES

    Another self ordained despot with Algores smeg on his face telling us what we must believe; makes me want to burn a B.S. degree in protest.
    Herewith an modest proposal: It shall be unlawful for any Environmentalist, or like minded desciple of socialist doctrine to purchase or posess any petrochemical product whatsoever. Violators will be subject to banishment from the United States, all territorial posessions, and or embassies and consulates.

  10. Blackiswhite, Imperial Agent Provocateur Comment by Blackiswhite, Imperial Agent Provocateur

    Hansen will use the symbolically charged 20th anniversary of his groundbreaking speech to the US Congress

    Symbolically charged? Groundbreaking?

    I’m fairly well read, and I have no idea what speech this refers to. Sound and fury that amounts to nothing.

  11. LC TerribleTroy Comment by LC TerribleTroy UNITED STATES

    And another one gets added to the “proverbial” list. … Now Im wondering where the statute for “Crimes against Humanity and Nature” is located.

    I need to update my list of people that should disapear for the benefit of Humanity and Nature. :em95:

  12. Lord Elrond Comment by Lord Elrond UNITED STATES

    New York Times Outs CIA Operative By Mick Wright | June 22, 2008 - 10:12 ET

    In an astonishing stroke of irony, the New York Times has outed the name of the CIA operative who interrogated 9/11 mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, over the objections of CIA Director Michael V. Hayden and a lawyer representing the operative.

    Agency officials and legal counsel told the Times that publishing the agent’s name would “invade his privacy and put him at risk of retaliation from terrorists or harassment from critics of the agency.”

    In an Editor’s Note linked from the story on KSM’s interrogation, the Times defended its decision by stating that “other government employees” had been “named publicly in books and published articles” or had chosen to go public themselves, by explaining that its policy “is to withhold the name of a news subject only very rarely,” and by arguing the operative’s name “was necessary for the credibility and completeness of the article.”

    Times reporter Scott Shane describes his scoop as “the closest look to date beneath the blanket of secrecy that hides the program from terrorists and from critics who accuse the agency of torture.”

    The CIA apparently believes that by publishing the operative’s name, the Times put the agent at risk for retaliatory strikes from such “critics” and terrorists, despite his here-described lack of participation in the agency’s “harsh interrogation methods.”

    Of course, this is just the latest in a long string of Times articles that have leaked classified and guarded information critical to America’s security and that of its people and public servants. Alert readers have long since stopped expecting any level of consistency from the same liberal media that was obsessed with the naming of Valerie Plame (though they’ve been considerably less obsessed with the actual source of Robert Novak’s column, Richard Armitage).

    The Central Intelligence Agency asked The New York Times not to publish the name of Deuce Martinez, an interrogator who questioned Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and other high-level Al Qaeda prisoners, saying that to identify Mr. Martinez would invade his privacy and put him at risk of retaliation from terrorists or harassment from critics of the agency.

    After discussion with agency officials and a lawyer for Mr. Martinez, the newspaper declined the request, noting that Mr. Martinez had never worked under cover and that others involved in the campaign against Al Qaeda have been named in news stories and books. The editors judged that the name was necessary for the credibility and completeness of the article.

    The Times’s policy is to withhold the name of a news subject only very rarely, most often in the case of victims of sexual assault or intelligence officers operating under cover.

    Mr. Martinez, a career analyst at the agency until his retirement a few years ago, did not directly participate in waterboarding or other harsh interrogation methods that critics describe as torture and, in fact, turned down an offer to be trained in such tactics.

    The newspaper seriously considered the requests from Mr. Martinez and the agency. But in view of the experience of other government employees who have been named publicly in books and published articles or who have themselves chosen to go public, the newspaper made the decision to print the name

    To our Grand and Glorious Emperor,

    Did you see this story? I thought it might be one worthy of a main topic.

    As usual, the liberal cockknockers at the NY Times don’t see anything wrong with their hypocrisy.

    I think that Pinch Sulzberger should be arrested and tried for treason, sincerely.

    I think the reign of that little commie prick at the Times should be ended.

    L.E. :em58:

  13. LC TerribleTroy Comment by LC TerribleTroy UNITED STATES

    The “credibility” of the article? What a fucking JOKE! Im am so pissed at this point I can only say that its a good godamn thing my name isnt Martinez.

  14. Alan K. Henderson Comment by Alan K. Henderson UNITED STATES

    George Carlin on environmentalism

  15. LC TerribleTroy Comment by LC TerribleTroy UNITED STATES

    RIP George. Thanks for the funnies… I didnt always agree, but you were funny the majority of the time

  16. Lord Elrond Comment by Lord Elrond UNITED STATES

    You know, after the fucking HISSY FIT that the times had about the whole Valerie Plame fiasco, you would think they would TRY to make an attempt to not appear so vulgarly partisan. :em72:

    I’m in Ann Coulter’s camp on the Valerie Plame issue. She was outed, yeah sure. She was so secret of an operative that her secret code name at the CIA was…Valerie Plame. :em01:

    I swear I would LOVE to see GWB make a referral of a potential case of treason to the Justice Department. I mean, what does he give a shit about? His approval rating? Probably wouldn’t do it to avoid backlash in the November 2008 elections….. :em41:

    L.E. :em58:

  17. Alan K. Henderson Comment by Alan K. Henderson UNITED STATES

    In the Bearded Spock Universe, Valerie Plame really was a covert agent, and she managed to keep Bob Novak from finding out:

    Novak: “How do I know you’re not from the CIA?”
    Plame: “If I were from the CIA you’d already be dead.”
    Novak: “If you were from the CIA you’d already be dead.”
    Plame: “Neither one of us is dead, so I’m obviously not from the CIA.”

    Would you believe…

  18. gahayz Comment by gahayz UNITED STATES

    Misha:

    Could you have your photoshop wizards add some target rings and bullseye to the
    picture of the “smug widdle prick” Hansen, and then post it so we can download
    and print it for, say, “entertainment” purposes?

    As for the New Dork Slimes, and all the treasonus cockroaches in the place,
    don’t we spray for cockroaches?

  19. gahayz Comment by gahayz UNITED STATES

  20. LC salfter Comment by LC salfter UNITED STATES

    We aren’t free now to disbelieve in global warming?

    Not if the Grünsturmabteilung have their way. :em98:

  21. LC Ogrrre, Imperial Grouch Comment by LC Ogrrre, Imperial Grouch UNITED STATES

    James Hansen, one of the world’s leading climate scientists,

    James Hansen, a legend in his own mind. Too bad he is lacking in integrity and honesty: if he doesn’t like the data, he dry labs an experiment or just makes up data out of whole cloth. The really pitiful part is that our government proceeds to formulate policy based on utter bullshit.