Now even the former high priests of the Church of the Gorebecile are abandoning ship (h/t Ace). Why don’t we let the author introduce himself?
I DEVOTED six years to carbon accounting, building models for the Australian Greenhouse Office. I am the rocket scientist who wrote the carbon accounting model (FullCAM) that measures Australia’s compliance with the Kyoto Protocol, in the land use change and forestry sector.
Not your average GLOBAL WARMING DENIER HERETIC NAZI REVISIONIST RAPIST OF GAIA™, we dare say, and certainly not somebody who embraced skepticism from the start either:
When I started that job in 1999 the evidence that carbon emissions caused global warming seemed pretty good: CO2 is a greenhouse gas, the old ice core data, no other suspects.
The evidence was not conclusive, but why wait until we were certain when it appeared we needed to act quickly? Soon government and the scientific community were working together and lots of science research jobs were created. We scientists had political support, the ear of government, big budgets, and we felt fairly important and useful (well, I did anyway). It was great. We were working to save the planet.
Note the emphasis that we added. This is what we’ve been saying all along, that you need only follow the money to find out how support for the Glowbull Wormening hysteria came about, so we’re quite pleased to hear a former member of that crowd saying so himself.
So what happened to turn this scientist to The Dark Side?
You’ll have to read the article yourself for that. It’s all good, and you won’t regret it.
A few teasers, however, in case you’re still reluctant to do so: He states, categorically, that there is no actual evidence that carbon emissions have a significant effect on global temperatures, NONE, and that any and all attempts, and they have been numerous, to locate such evidence have come up empty.
If you don’t believe him, and why anybody would not believe such a statement coming from somebody who for years was looking for such evidence to vindicate his own theories is beyond us, he offers the following:
If there really was any evidence that carbon emissions caused global warming, don’t you think we would have heard all about it ad nauseam by now?
Quite.
He also notes that the only objective, reliable means we have of measuring global temperature changes show that the warming trend stopped around 2001 and that we’ve seen actual cooling since then.
And, finally, before you go read the whole thing, he also notes that the much vaunted ice core samples that show a correlation between CO2 levels and global temperature, the very same “evidence” that the Gorebecile used as conclusive proof in his 2005 propaganda flick “An Inconvenient Truth”, show a correlation alright. It’s just that the correlation is that CO2 levels follow warming rather than precede it. What’s worse, this has been known since 2003, two years prior to the Gorebecile causing the watermelons to cream their undies and declare the debate “over.” Yet nobody ever mentioned that.
Funny, no?



![Validate my RSS feed [Valid RSS]](http://validator.w3.org/feed/images/valid-rss.png)
Entries (RSS)
Better late than never. At least he’s honest enough to repent the foolishness. While I would normally be profoundly irate at him for participating in this con game, at least he was honest enough to change his ways. If only the other folks would do the same.
July 17th, 2008 at 12:53 PMUsing
From the article:
I couldn’t have said it better myself. The problem here is that they don’t want to provide evidence. Like a cult, they want you to drink the Kool-Aid and be a good little mindless drone.
July 17th, 2008 at 12:55 PMUsing
Something that I’ve had beaten into my brain in every psych class I’ve taken (My hard science classes are in the distant enough past I don’t remember if we discussed it there as well, . . .):
CORRELATION DOES NOT EQUAL CAUSATION. :em98:
Indeed given that he’s seeing the higher concentration of CO2 after the rise in temperature it’s a perfect example of the dangers of mixing correlation and causation.
July 17th, 2008 at 1:49 PMUsing
The population boom, pesticides, the ozone layer, Y2K, global warm-, oops I mean “climate change,” etc.
Some people just like hysterics. And like most hysterics, they are almost always wrong. Eventually it will be common knowledge that global warming was a scam of the highest proportions. That day can’t come soon enough.
Tangent alert: People got all hysterical about pesticides which were certain to do us untold harm and so agriculture developed strains of plants that were naturally resistant to bugs, but then what happened? GMO’s! Frankenfood! Some people are never happy.
July 17th, 2008 at 1:52 PMUsing
Other Subjects For Past (and Current) Hysterics:
Brain tumors from cellphones. Satanic child-molesting cult rings in pre-schools. UFO’s. Bigfoot. Littering. Smoking in both public and private places. Preservatives in food. High power lines close to your home or office. Microwave emissions from ovens. Red food dye and aspartame causing birth defects. Lack of seat belts. Motorcycle helmet usage. The Loch Ness Monster. AIDS spread through the air. Duck and cover atom bomb drills in school. The Coming Ice Age.
And From the Very Distant (Though Not That Much) Past:
Fairies. The Evil Eye. Leprechauns. The Inquisition. Various Sun Gods. Ghengis Khan.
July 17th, 2008 at 4:15 PMUsing
[...] this article hit the web with beautiful excerpts like this one (thank you Rott). So far that debate has just consisted of a simple sleight of hand: show evidence of global [...]
July 17th, 2008 at 5:00 PMUsing
“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.” [H. L. Mencken]
Quote from the Neal Boortz website.
July 17th, 2008 at 6:22 PMUsing
Hmmm, and the same day this came out
:em01:
July 17th, 2008 at 9:31 PMUsing
LC EFA, The Thunder of Chunder From Down Under, hit me up with this Astronomical Kick to The Goreacle’s & Rudd’s Shriveled, Dust-shooting Nads.
It’s so damned good that I’m not going to even excerpt it here. You’ve gotta go read the whole thing yourselves.
July 17th, 2008 at 10:00 PMUsing
anon@#5
July 17th, 2008 at 10:59 PMDon’t forget bovine flatulance.
Using
And actually, it makes sense in a certain way that globull wormening would cause CO2 to rise. Temps rise, causing changes in weather patters. Areas that were forested or grass filled plains dry up and become tinderboxes. One good lightning strike and BOOM! Forest fires from hell, since they didn’t have the state of California’s fire fighters out there putting them out. Where does the Gorebicile think the CO2 came from anyway? Space aliens using the earth for their experiments with the internal combustion engine?
July 18th, 2008 at 11:03 AMUsing
Absolutely. Not to mention something that’s known to anybody who has ever had a bottle of coke in the house. As the temperature goes up, the capacity of the coke to hold on to CO2 goes down and it will start releasing it.
The same with oceans. As their temperature rises, they start releasing their vast reservoirs of CO2.
It’s so simple that only a Gorebecile can fail to understand it.
July 18th, 2008 at 11:42 AMUsing