You are viewing the

- 2008 Archives -

If you like sloppy seconds, this would be the page for you. All of the material you find here was posted over the course of 2008. All threads found in this archive are now closed and you cannot register, sign in, or comment.

Are you looking for the CURRENT VERSION of the Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler?

… because, when the citizens in the southern provinces of Canuckistan are shoveling their cars out of snow drifts in July and the ski resorts in Colorado keep their lifts running year-round in a few years, you’re going to be hard-pressed to convince the American people sheeple to commit economic suicide and that The Great Goreacle and his Moronic Marxist Minions™ are anything other than the snake oil salesmen that we all know them to be.

We’ve put our plans for opening that chain of surf shops in northwestern Iowa on permanent hiatus.

We’re not going to “copy/paste” the data that the esteemed Mr. Watt’s has up in the post. Just click the link and go see it for yourselves.

Oh, and if you haven’t bookmarked his site as the Louisville Slugger® of ClueClubs™ for beating your retarded friends, family & co-workers who are Goreacolytes™ about their mushy, helmet-wearing skulls, you’re in deep feces. (You HAVE bookmarked it, haven’t you?)

F.E.T.E.

18 Responses to “Note To Congresscritters: Y’all Better Hurry Up With That “Cap & Trade” Bullshit Ponzi Scheme Legislation…”
  1. DдrтH бдкфи Comment by DдrтH бдкфи

    Foist.

    Unfalsifiable Hypothesis is what these illiterate and benighted shrimps have signed onto.

  2. The Southern Libertarian Comment by The Southern Libertarian

    B.C

    We’re not going to “copy/paste” the data that the esteemed Mr. Watt’s has up in the post. Just click the link and go see it for yourselves.

    Yeah right. “Just click the pretty link do not be afraid, I wouldn;t lead you astray” says B.C. with a mischievious grin on his face. Cmon now B.C you should know better than to think we are actually gonna click on your link.

    I may have been born at night but it wasn;t last night.

  3. DдrтH бдкфи Comment by DдrтH бдкфи

    SL, can you read the text of the hyperlink?

    :em02:

  4. The Southern Libertarian Comment by The Southern Libertarian

    Darth Bakon

    SL, can you read the text of the hyperlink?

    It’s a trick I tell ya. For all I know it could be some fugly fat chick or worse. You never know with B.C.

  5. LC SkyeChild G.L.O.R. Comment by LC SkyeChild G.L.O.R. UNITED STATES

    It’s safe.

  6. The Southern Libertarian Comment by The Southern Libertarian

    Thanks Skye, you are a far braver person than I am. Based on your advice, I held my breath and clicked the link. And to my amazement it was actually very informative and easy on the eyes. Who knew that a B.C. link could contain something other than fat nekkid women.

    P.S Thanks Skye for being my human shield er I mean B.C. link tester. :em69:

  7. LC TerribleTroy Comment by LC TerribleTroy UNITED STATES

    Easy SL … its just BC’s way of lulling you into a false sense of security as a set up for his next link.

  8. fmwoods01 Comment by fmwoods01 UNITED STATES

    “It’s safe” out of the mouth of babes……………

    SL, understandable hesitation after the last enlightenment from the joint effort of Rad and BC. This is his token “awe shucks fellas, you can trust me” link. Lot of good liberal ammo on this site. Time to stock up on some surplus cold-weather gear. Any body know where I can find an insulation kit for a GP Medium?

    LC D’

  9. The Southern Libertarian Comment by The Southern Libertarian

    fmwoods01

    SL, understandable hesitation after the last enlightenment from the joint effort of Rad and BC. This is his token “awe shucks fellas, you can trust me” link.

    Kind of like the links where he posted two pics of surprisingly pretty women…….followed by something so nasty it makes Rosie O’Donnel look less ugly by comparison(Didn;t think that was possible) Bait and switch, we are onto him now.

    Lot of good liberal ammo on this site. Time to stock up on some surplus cold-weather gear. Any body know where I can find an insulation kit for a GP Medium?

    Those things suck. They are a bitch to setup and they leak like a mofo. I only wish I could find the idiot genius who designed it and decided to sell it to the army and rip him a new one er I mean congratulate him.

  10. fmwoods01 Comment by fmwoods01 UNITED STATES

    SL,
    They go up a little easier if you get help. That ridge pole can be tough when you try it by yourself. The leaks are a constant supply of drinking, cooking, and washing water. Besides, they only leak around the flue pipe when there is three feet of snow on them.

    LC D’

  11. Ten-Ten Comment by Ten-Ten UNITED STATES

    May, 23 this year. Got caught in a white-out blizzard in Wyoming. Kinda late in the year, no?

  12. rnman1999 Comment by rnman1999 UNITED STATES

    BTW, the latest sunspot cycleis really getting fired up….

  13. LC 0311 crunchie I.M.H. Comment by LC 0311 crunchie I.M.H.

    Trying to show facts and actual science to the Goreacle Minions BC? Never knew you to be such an optimist, er sadist. Yeah, sadist, that’s it.

    Kinda fun to watch their lil’ ol’ heads etplode ain’t it?

  14. LC SkyeChild G.L.O.R. Comment by LC SkyeChild G.L.O.R. UNITED STATES

    I know some here don’t believe in God, but I do, and it never ceases to amuse me when man’s hubris kicks in, and he starts to play God.

    The “big guy,” meanwhile, is cooking up stuff that could wipe out the planet with one spoken word. He’s basically saying…”do you feel lucky? Well, do ya, punk?”

  15. Eyas Comment by Eyas UNITED STATES

    There seems to be a lot of attention and hype around a 1-year drop in temperature. IF you were to assume that Global Warming were true; one year’s temperature drop is meaningless.

    What is not meaningless is that the first roughly 100 years of temperature data are total garbage. In 1860, for instance, the IPCC claims to have calculated a “Global” Average” temperature based on thermometer readings from less than 16% of the planet’s surface. This is not possible.

    In short, the first 100 years of temperature data — upon which the entire Global Warming Theory is based — is utter crap.

    There has not been any warming! Never was any warming! There has NEVER BEEN any credible evidence that the Earth has warmed over the past 150 years!

    In order to even suggest a Global Warming Theory, the FIRST, and most important, thing that one MUST have is credible evidence of increasing temperatures. This does not exist and never has.

    The data is on the IPCC website in the HadCRUT database for anyone to see.

    Thus, I’m baffled at any concern over whether or not Global Warming is or is not man-made. There has been NO warming.

    I’m baffled by concerns about how Global Warming is affected by one-year’s temperature data. There has been NO warming.

    I’m baffled by concerns about whether the hottest year was 1997 or 1938. There has been NO warming.

    I’m baffled by concerns about whether temperatures have declined since 1997. There has been NO warming.

    I’m baffled by concerns about whether ice-caps are growing or shrinking. There has been NO warming.

    I’m baffled by concerns about who and what generates more greenhouse gas - oil or cattle; the U.S. or China. There has been NO warming.

    There are no issues in the Global Warming debate which are of any interest or value; except ONE — there is not now, nor has there EVER BEEN (since 1860) ANY CREDIBLE EVIDENCE OF ANY WARMING. They never had it. They can’t now get it. It’s been a lie since DAY ONE. Without statistically reliable evidence of increasing Global Average temperatures — which IPCC does not now, nor have they ever posessed — the entire Global Warming Theory MUST be entirely discounted. Reliable temperatures over a long enough time series are the sine qua non that Global Warming cannot exist without.

    It is not there. It has never been there.

    THERE HAS NEVER BEEN ANY WARMING!

  16. LC JackBoot IC/A-OBR Comment by LC JackBoot IC/A-OBR

    BC-

    What really struck me in the article:

    But even more impressive is the change since the last big peak in global temperature in January 2007 at 0.594°C, giving a 16 month ∆T of -0.774°C which is equal in magnitude to the generally agreed upon “global warming signal” of the last 100 years.

    IOW, the actual, for real, global temperature decrease is now GREATER than the gorebecilic droolers, have glommed onto for warming temperatures for the last 100 years over a span of only 16 months. They’re bass-ackwards by a factor of 160%.

    Ooops there goes another rubber hypothesis plant.

  17. Godismyjudge Comment by Godismyjudge UNITED STATES

    Eyas,

    If John McCain says there is global warming then there dang well has been global warming.

  18. LC TerribleTroy Comment by LC TerribleTroy UNITED STATES

    So let make sure I understand what you’re saying EYAS. Did you say there is no gobal warming … or something to that effect?