RDF:![[Valid RSS]](http://validator.w3.org/feed/images/valid-rss.png "Validate my RSS feed")
A ClueClubbing™ Of Astronomical Proportions
Posted by: in Ecofreaks, Global Wormening, Good News, Junk "Science", Righteous Bitchslaps9:30 PM
Ladies & gentlemen… children and small pets of all ages… sub-retarded, helmet-wearing, bib-drooling LefTards of all nationalities: Take a bathroom break, grab a cooler full of cold (or warm) beverages, several packs of smokes (or a few tubs of your favorite snack food) and then go over and read one of the finest bitch-slaps ever delivered in the history of the Whorehouse on the Potomac™.
Here’s just a tiny sample of the telephone pole-sized ClueBat™ that Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R- People’s Republik of Kalifornistan) whipped out and jammed up The Gorebecile’s™ rectum in a sideways fashion.
I would like to point out that before the introduction of cattle, millions upon millions of buffalo dominated the Great Plains of America. They were so thick you could not see where the herd started and where it ended. I can only assume that the anti-meat, manmade global warming crowd must believe that buffalo farts have more socially redeeming value than the same flatulence emitted by cattle. Yes, this is absurd, but the deeper one looks into this global warming juggernaut, the weirder this movement becomes and the more denial is evident. (Emphasis mine—B.)
It’s not often that we see someone in Washington, D.C. The World’s Largest Brothel™ whip out his testicles and give a good, ol’ fashioned tea baggin’ to the idiot EnviroNazis. We, down here in the Imperial Dungeon™ Game Room™, stand up and give a rousing ovation to the good Representative and can only hope that his display of Testicular Tempestitudinalness™ will set an example for the other sniveling pussies in Congress and they start fighting back against the Marxist Mother Gaians™ who wish to force economic and cultural suicide upon this great nation.
F.E.T.E.
Entries (RSS)
Pity that glowball wormening is such a religion to its true believers. Except for this minor problem, you could almost hope that this would FINALLY break through their skulls.
RH
June 5th, 2008 at 9:45 PMUsing
On the other hand, the DC police will be setting up “safe zones” and arresting anyone found in them that doesn’t belong and refuses to leave.
June 5th, 2008 at 9:46 PMDarn, missed my first FOIST.
Using
Now that’s what I call a bitchslap! That link is now going out to everybody on my mailing list…. :em69:
June 5th, 2008 at 10:07 PMUsing
This nut-sack-black-jack wielding sumbitch is from Cali-fuckin-fornia????\
Mebbe there is hope for the left coast after all…
Off Topic and in Other Good News…
JMFL, my close, personal GI life saving, jihadi fragging friend leaves The Sandbox for The Land Of The Big PX -
TOMORROW!!!!!!
In his honor, I wanna post a video that has my favorite thing, AC/DC and choppers…
TWO of my favorite things, AC/DC and choppers and explosions…
My THREE favorite things, AC/DC and choppers and explosions and fraggin’ rags…
Amongst my favorite things are AC/DC, Choppers, Explosions and Fraggin’ ‘rags…
Oh dammit…. here’s the video….
June 5th, 2008 at 10:09 PMUsing
Not all of us are insane, Forger. Just maybe most of us…..I like it out in the sticks, where most folks think, feel and believe as I do. I just can’t handle the cities anymore.
June 5th, 2008 at 10:32 PMUsing
Enjoyed the read quite a bit and sent it down range to a few buds.
Forger Pass on respects and wishs for a safe return to your BUD. My advice to him… BE A PROFESSIONAL….. stay focused, there is no such thing as a routine mission and the only easy day was yesterday.
Cool vid too….. I think ( I maybe crazy) one of those clips was actually filmed by a buddy of mine. Its was a IR clip of a B Hawk hitting a LZ. If Im correct it was a SF execise in Korea.
BTW .. My uncle in law shipped for the stan yesterday. And he volunteered to go.
June 5th, 2008 at 11:22 PMUsing
Yes- he is, and you can’t have him :em58: Truth be told though, he’s a staunch conservative in one of the most conservative areas in SoCal. I had the pleasure of meeting him when I lived in Costa Mesa- not far from his home turf- and I like him. I can envision a ticket with him and Duncan Hunter.
June 5th, 2008 at 11:30 PMUsing
Shit yeah! Now, can someone print out a copy, bring it to McCain’s office and stick it up his ass for me?
June 5th, 2008 at 11:31 PMUsing
A quote from the most excellent Mr. Rohrabacher’s speech:
Yes, Mr. Rohrabacher, they do. And, unfortunately, they’re absolutely right. 90% of the world’s population, our voting population included, do not have the common sense to come in out of the rain. And that’s not just me being pissed off, that’s according to highly scientific studies, complete with bell curves, normal distributions, surveys and all.
There just aren’t that many of us inhabiting the right slope of the bell curve and, what’s worse, we’ll always be in the minority. It’s pure mathematics. Nothing can be done to change that.
Short of changing to a system of meritocracy, that is, just like the Founders envisioned, but that train has long since left the station.
One idiot, one vote.
We’re going to get it, and we’re going to get it good and hard.
The End.
June 5th, 2008 at 11:41 PMUsing
And for those of you having the vapors over my previous post, let me put it to you this way:
You don’t have a problem with private companies hiring according to qualifications, do you? You don’t have a problem with the fact that you know that it’s not the janitor performing your quadruple bypass, but a highly qualified surgeon vetted thoroughly by the hospital staff before he was given the position, do you? You don’t have a problem with employees in private companies being unceremoniously shitcanned if they fuck up and create untold mayhem, suffering and heartache for innocent customers, do you? You don’t have a problem with the fact that the board of directors of private companies aren’t selected by a random gaggle of people hauled in off the street asked to cast a vote, do you?
Now tell me: Which works better, more efficiently, cheaper overall and benefiting more people on the whole? Private corporations or the federal government?
Take your time. No rush. Just make sure that you’re comfortable with your answer before you hand it in, because it WILL be graded.
Thatisall.
June 5th, 2008 at 11:51 PMUsing
I still prefer one person one vote, I think the real problem is that fact that :
A) the importance af the duty to vote with a eduated understanding is purposely minimized (easily repaired with the return of civics class throughout the education process)
B) the information concerning the candidates is purposely manipulated by the media (This kind of “reporting” must be stamped out)
C) the “professional politician” One who spends a entire career in politics. (term limits for all offices PERIOD and the address to minimize “political dynastys”. )
June 6th, 2008 at 12:41 AMUsing
And who is supposed to bring that back? The same politicians who, being elected by idiots utterly ignorant of even the most basic facts about what makes a society function, have less than no interest in those same morons learning what really makes the world go around.
You’re not wrong, it’s just not ever going to happen unless we suddenly get a class of narcissist, power hungry politicians with a morbid interest in sawing off the branch upon which they are precariously perched.
Sure. With what? Legislation? Who passes that? The same class of leeches who wouldn’t have their sinecures if it wasn’t for the benevolence and sycophancy of the media. You think they’re going to curtail the freedoms of the pimps without whom they wouldn’t have a livelihood?
This one I don’t understand. What is the problem with being a professional? If you invest your entire life in a profession, any profession, and you turn out to be good at it, how’s this a problem? In a true meritocracy you’d either have to perform or you’d be out on your fucking ear. So what if your family has spent their entire lives honing those skills? If you’re good at it and you provide desirable results, I don’t honestly give a good fuck whether your entire bloodline has been in the business or not.
Again: I’m talking about a meritocracy where you are hired and fired based only based on your skills, just like the corporate world that most of us live in. I’m NOT talking about what we have now where the fact that your last name is Kennedy automatically buys you 50 million votes. Sure, the same thing might happen in a meritocracy, but it would only happen ONCE. If you can kick the assholes that you’ve entrusted with the powers of government out in a New York minute and if that power is limited to people who know what the fuck they’re talking about (retards addicted to Oprah and Jerry Springer need not apply), then the potential damage of the odd assclown sneaking through the filter is as limited as it is in the private sector.
Again: Who would you rather have administrating your bypass operation, a professional surgeon employed in the private health care sector or a janitor from the DMV?
June 6th, 2008 at 12:56 AMUsing
Sorry Troy, I have to disagree.
Considering the Libtards teaching throughout this process, this will help how?
Agree with the argument that the media manipulates candidate information but would argue that disenfranchising those too stupid to recognize it would be more effective then stamping it out, (Consider the fact that the only way to stamp it out would be through government action, so think about who would be doing the stamping.)
If the federal government was restricted to the things they are supposed to be doing, I wouldn;t give a shit how long they serve. Term limits sre not the answer, a return to Constitutional government is.
June 6th, 2008 at 1:05 AMUsing
Damn too slow
June 6th, 2008 at 1:06 AMUsing
Does this mean they have officially called off those New Ice Age predictions we all kept hearing in the late 1970s?
June 6th, 2008 at 2:07 AMUsing
To forger and troy-wish them thanks from me :em04: Regarding the actual post-the problem with the enviromental movement is that people do not debate it like they would any other scientific topic, they discuss it like religion, and act like dissentors are infidels. True science does not stop questoning, and it should always be debated.
June 6th, 2008 at 5:03 AMUsing
[...] “Emperor” Misha: [...]
June 6th, 2008 at 5:38 AMUsing
mindy1 said:
Exactly. Only problem is, the EnviroNazis declared the debate “over” without ever actually holding a debate in the first place. The ugly facts of Global Cooling™, due to latest on-set of the all-too-naturally-occurring Solar Minimum, are kicking the members of the Church of the Whorey Gorebecile™ squarely in their shriveled testicles and they’re scrambling, like retarded rhesus monkeys on crack, to come up with some way to blame the upcoming food and heating fuel shortages, due to snow-covered, shortened growing seasons, on “man-made climate change“, now that it’s been proven, beyond ANY doubt, that their fraudulent “runaway greenhouse” predictions aren’t going to come fruition.
On the bright side, we can use their frozen, patchouli-infused bodies as fuel when the ice sheets reach Texas.
June 6th, 2008 at 8:29 AM:em93:
Using
This, I think, is the actual money quote. Idiots(not you/us, the ecofreaks). The EARTH itself burps more bullshit into the environment every single fucking DAY than humans have since they were invented. They should all simply quit wasting our air.
June 6th, 2008 at 8:49 AMUsing
This just in! Balls found in Kalifornistan!
June 6th, 2008 at 9:21 AMUsing
Misha
In theory, it’s not. In reality, the human condition prevails. If you’re a professional politician, then you’re going to do what it takes to stay or advance in your profession. Compromise a few principles? Sure. Cut a few back-room deals? If necessary. Say what the people who elect you want to hear, and make sure to send as much pork their way as possible? Absolutely.
Meritocracy or not, you’re still stuck with only the best of those people who choose politics as a profession. Yeah, you can throw the bums out … but who is waiting in the wings? McVain, Obambi, Ron Paul???
Strict term limits would reset the system back to something more like the founding fathers envisioned. Average citizens who feel strongly about trying to make this country the best it can be would take a few - and only a few - years out of their life to go and serve. Because they can’t become “professional politicians,” they’re not worried about re-election, and thus are more likely to vote based on their conscience and/or principles.
The way to get rid of some of the shit in DC is to start flushing it on a regular basis.
June 6th, 2008 at 9:22 AMUsing
Oh, btw Forger, BRILLIANT!
June 6th, 2008 at 9:22 AMUsing
The shit we’re wallowing in now was brought on by one-person-one-vote because, for the past 50 years, the MSM and other dunderheads have been screaming for EVERYONE to vote. The result is people casting votes that don’t even know the candidate’s names let alone the issues. I’m with Misha. It’s high time to stop the bullshit. Meritocracy or a close approximation would get my vote and I hope the revolution comes before we hit bottom.
June 6th, 2008 at 9:23 AMUsing
And BigDogg, excellent point.
June 6th, 2008 at 9:24 AMUsing
OH SNAP!!!
That one is gonna leave a mark!!!
(Fixed the “embolden” thing for ya’—B.)
June 6th, 2008 at 9:54 AMUsing
* (non-oblgatory disclaimer) I am enjoying this aspect of this thread and can see we have varying points of view, it is my hope that “context” is kept in consideration at all times as we move forward and that there is no degeneration into flaming due to differing points of view)**
Misha If you have the time and inclination can you provide your basic vision of how this meritocracy would function from representation perspective. Who would be this “board” that conducted the Hiring and (more importantly) firing? How would they be selected? Who would monitor them? What method of determination would be used to identify those eligible to vote? If it is a matter of intellect, how would that intellect be developed? What insititution would be used to impart the knowledge necessary to develop the intellect?
If your model of meritocracy could be emplaced on the political system, would a similar model also be effective in addressing the issue of the media manipulation? And I understand that the media are private corporations, but that doesnt relieve them of thier civic duties.
Blanket Statement I am very reluctant to deviate from the founding fathers vision regarding voting and the system they designed. It is not that I am above the idea of “tweaking” it to be more efficient or representative of thier ideals, but I am reluctant to engage in large modifications. I think the design has served us very very well.
Biggdogg Thanks for the support on the professional politician issue. I am of the mind that a corporate “professional” and political “professional” are not similar in analogy. What corporate position allows you to show up for work and not be productive? Say …. like voting “present” instead of Yay or Nay? WTF is that all about? Voting present?
I think there is a large number of ignorant people out there. I define them as unknowing, not incapable of learning. I also think there is a percentage of stupid people who I define as intellectually incapable of “learning” beyond a certain level.
And finally, what was the percentage of persons that vote in comparison to the actual number of eligible voters? (leave out chicago cause we know dead people vote there)
Thanks for everyones tolerance, Im writing off the cuff.
June 6th, 2008 at 11:04 AMUsing
My point (and I think Misha’s) is that today’s universal sufferage is an extreme deviation from the founding fathers’ vision and the system they designed.
June 6th, 2008 at 12:00 PMUsing
This whole thread (I tend to reluctantly agree with Misha’s comments) kind of relates to a movie I saw awhile ago:
Anybody here ever see Mike Judge’s “Idiocracy” movie/DVD from a couple of years back? The basic premise involves a guy who is frozen in our time waking up to a future wherein, because stupid people simply breed more often and with more people, the demographics of society have caused a HUGE dumbing-down of the entire populace.
Basically, no one knows how to do anything anymore, and the politicians are just as dumb. In fact, the president is now a pro-wrestler!
The movie is pretty funny in parts, but ultimately a little over-the-top, but worth a rental at least
…
Jon
June 6th, 2008 at 12:26 PMUsing
I dont disagree agree with that Chuck, but I am more inclined to action designed to return to the founding fathers vision vs. something different. And the key to that last sentence is the word inclined, because (as an example) I am not theoretically opposed to “earning” or establishing the right to vote as long as the criteria for establishing that right is as reasonably inclusive as possible.
Yes it is true I am mentally fractured, in regards that I always play devils advocate within my own head, examine as many sources as possible, before I adopt a definitive standard. I dont know if Im ignorant or just overly “introspective.” One thing is for sure… I aint even close to some of the thinkers here….. but Im working on it. :em93:
June 6th, 2008 at 12:28 PMUsing
Just my quick $.02 first:
“One man, one vote” would mean that the East & West coasts (plus Chicago & Dallas) would be deciding everything for the rest of us.
No thank you.
I am quite content to stick with a system where every state has an equal voice - even the flyover states in ‘JesusLand’.
- MuscleDaddy
June 6th, 2008 at 12:31 PMUsing
Now, my favorite part (so far) from the ClueBatting:
These people can’t make up their minds - yesterday, someone called in and accused Hugh Hewitt of “McCarthy-ism” for his criticism of Obama…
So which is it? Are we for the commies or agin’ ‘em?
- MuscleDaddy
June 6th, 2008 at 12:38 PMUsing
My own, much shorter argument against global warming theory. Ahem..
What makes you think that the man who can’t tell you the accurate weather for next Friday can actually predict the weather in 100 years?
June 6th, 2008 at 12:40 PMUsing
Okay, maybe this is my favorite part:
Makes me wish Gore had been there, so C-SPAN could’ve snagged video of him squirming under that.
- MuscleDaddy
June 6th, 2008 at 12:52 PMUsing
MuscleDaddy,
I don’t really understand the Electoral College, I admit. But don’t the states have different numbers of electors, based on population? And I thought some states were winner-take-all, and some split between repub and dem…
That doesn’t sound to me like a “equal voice.”
June 6th, 2008 at 1:16 PMUsing
And, that SHOULD read aN equal voice. geeze…
June 6th, 2008 at 1:18 PMUsing
Hey SkyeChild,
Understanding the electoral system isn’t for the short attention span folks.
But, it’s a good thing.
This is the most simple introduction I know of, ‘hope it helps.
June 6th, 2008 at 1:41 PMUsing
Skye,
Granted, the “winnier take all” states are …. problematic…
To your other point - yes, some states get more electors based on population - but it’s usually the difference between something akin to 2 vs. 4 votes, which - for the sake of example - would still allow two 4-million-population states to defend themselves against welfare-driven depredations of a single 19-million-population state.
(not that there’s anything wrong with NY…)
Particularly important when dealing with elections/decisions having national ramifications.
Otherwise, Presidential nominees wouldn’t bother acknowledging the existence of the “middle states”, much less making decisions that would benefit them.
They wouldn’t have to, only needing the coasts to perpetuate their own careers/fortunes.
- MuscleDaddy
June 6th, 2008 at 1:54 PMUsing
I see that StinkingMeat is trolling for hits on its pathetic wasteland again, up in #17… Pitiful… just pitiful.
:em01: :em99: :em01: :em99:
June 6th, 2008 at 1:57 PMUsing
B.C.,
Don’t feed somthin’ ya can’t poison.
- MD
June 6th, 2008 at 2:02 PMUsing
Skye,
We don’t elect the president and thank the founders of this nation that we don’t. Each state decides how it wants to choose the members of the electoral college. Those selected members vote to decide who is elected President. Unfortunately our country has devolved into a two party system who decide on their own how they select a candidate for President.
June 6th, 2008 at 2:12 PMUsing
Skye,
Without the electoral college a limited number of cities (New York, Chicago, San Fransicko, Los Angles, Phoenix, San Diego, Seattle) would be selecting our President. I’m not comfortable with that. I want a say in who gets elected and the electoral college gives small rural areas a say in who gets elected. The system is not perfect and some tweaking could be done to improve it.
June 6th, 2008 at 2:17 PMUsing
Cheap and Azygos,
Thanks for the information. According to Cheapshot’s article, all but Nebraska and Maine are winner-take-all. If I recall correctly, those two states are also the only ones with unicamerals. I don’t know if that has anything to do with it.
June 6th, 2008 at 2:18 PMUsing
Sorry for the Off Topic, but…
Muslim Extremist’s Web Site Stirs Mixed Emotions in Charlotte, N.C.
Further proof that we are not serious about fighting the enemy. Had this type of thing happened in WWII, the goat-fellating, camel-humping asshole for Allah (piss be upon him) would have been killed by a mob of patriots, and his parents house would have been burned to the ground.
As it should be.
June 6th, 2008 at 3:20 PMUsing
And while I’m off topic, let’s all take a moment to remember the heroes who hit the beaches of Normandy, with the full support of those back home I might add, 64 years ago.
June 6th, 2008 at 3:23 PMUsing
No, no - it’s okay - don’t thank me, Skye…least I could do…
- MD
June 6th, 2008 at 3:24 PMUsing
Okay, okay, MuscleDaddy,
You, too. :em04:
Sorry. :em58:
June 6th, 2008 at 3:41 PMUsing
TerribleTroy from way the hell back in # 11:
Might I suggest a solution to # 1, 2 and 3? The Bob Heinlein solution from “Starship Troupers” (the book, not the movie)? That is, to earn the right to vote, be a Military Veteran. The vote, the ability to choose the Government of out country is too important to be given to Joe Shit the Ragman, but should be reserved to those who care enough to have put their own life on the line to protect the state.
Just a thought.
June 6th, 2008 at 4:09 PMUsing
Actually Wil it was Starship Troopers that started my meager wheels spinning on this very subject. I would have to extend that privelage to the other professions that I feel “serve” above and beyond on a daily basis. Firefighters, EMT’s, Police Officers, Teachers…
Here’s another one for you at the very least THE VERY LEAST only full citizens should enjoy the complete benefits, rights, and protections. Example…. shit boy visitor from land of muckity muck, would not have the same rights (search and seizure) as a full citizen. Nor would one here on a “student” visa. And if you are found to be an illegal alien…. fuhget about it! you got no reasonable expectation to any rights whatsoever.
June 6th, 2008 at 5:37 PMUsing
Works fer me, Troy.
If yer not a citizen, your max expectation should be humane treatment - that is, no gratuitous beatings, and a trial before execution, Minimum is deportation to the furthest point from the U,S, in your home country, permanent exclusion, and tell the home country police where we plan to deliver their trash.
June 6th, 2008 at 5:48 PMUsing
Oh, and if yer reading Heinlein, and understand what you read, they are not meager wheels. IIRC, the exceptions to the above rule was Police Officers, Firemen, and Federal Life Safety / Experimental personnel.
June 6th, 2008 at 5:55 PMUsing
In the Heinlein story it was Service, not just Military Service that gained Citizenship. However once you voluntered the choice was not yours, it was made by apptiude testing and based on needs of the community. So Cops, Fire Service all SERVED.
June 6th, 2008 at 6:12 PMUsing
So ultimatley we are back to the individuals understanding of civic responsibility and participation. And in my mind that is the foundation solution that needs to be implemented, along with a concerted effort toward “unification” vs. multi-culturalism, when it comes to addressing some of the “issues” we are facing as a country (we meaning the US …. all the rest of you …. you’re already fucked :em95: )
June 6th, 2008 at 6:39 PMUsing
[...] The Big Dog Gang) Submit to Stumbled Upon! -Bill Quick comment on this [...]
June 6th, 2008 at 6:42 PMUsing
“THE BIG DOG GANG”………..nice ring
LC D’
June 6th, 2008 at 6:58 PMUsing
Yeah, what LC Beaker sez……God Bless them all.
Honor them and never forget their sacrifice
June 6th, 2008 at 8:18 PMUsing
:em04: Never forget, indeed. :em04:
June 6th, 2008 at 11:04 PMUsing
[...] Dana Rohrabacher slammed the global warming crowd quite nicely last [...]
June 7th, 2008 at 7:55 AMUsing
I am decidedly NOT someone who subscribes to popular conspiracy theories, but the recent dramatic upswing in the already brazen nature of the “Climate Change” propaganda and power/control grab (in spite of the sheer lack of anything near conclusive evidence that such a phenomenon exists), plus the “coincidental,” outlandish and crippling surge in energy costs, have me wondering about the possibility of external manipulation. This double punch to the gut may be softening the public into accepting a fat, shit on rye sammich. China seems to have the most to gain from this scenario, seeing that they are exempt from reigning in their gargantuan carbon footprint (by virtue of the Kyoto Accord - “developing economy” my ass!), they have plenty of cheap labor and towering mountains of cash from outsourced manufacturing and multi-billion dollar deals with such patriotic companies like, say… Wally World.
The Clinton Administration taught us how nice and snuggly public servants and politicians can get with Chinese Yuans. Perhaps the Yuan is helping to fuel the
CommieGreenie power grab in Washington?Just a thought.
BTW, my brother-in-law flies to mainland China quite often and states that air pollution there is completely off the scale. So bad he cannot see the ground most of the time aloft. WHERE IS THE GLOBAL OUTRAGE??? If we are about to experience carbon-induced mass extinction, why would the world community allow such an astronomical carbon footprint? That would be freakin’ SUICIDE, would it not???
Hmmmm… Maybe it has nothing at all to do with carbon footprints. Could it be that THIS is the real “Green” agenda:
June 7th, 2008 at 8:58 AMWorkers of the World Unite!
Using
Screwed the image link up…
June 7th, 2008 at 9:01 AMWorkers of the World Unite!
Using
BTW… Where is everybody?
June 7th, 2008 at 9:29 AMUsing
Major, that little Commie cartoon is right along the lines of a little ShopJob™ that I put together just this morning!
:em93:
Update: BTW, here’s the original that the ShopJob™ was created from…
June 7th, 2008 at 1:09 PMUsing
BC, I can’t claim any credit for the Commie Anime. I came across it during a web search on “Green Commies” or something of the sort. It seemed to fit the message. Now YOUR commie shop jobs are spot on! Two red peas in a pod! :em69:
June 7th, 2008 at 1:25 PMUsing
Two Red Peas in a GREEN pod…
June 7th, 2008 at 1:26 PMUsing
In Heinliens book you made the choice to serve and then served where you were best suited. After you were done with your service you could get a “reserved” job such as police officer.
June 7th, 2008 at 1:41 PMUsing
As long as it comes with Denise Richards, Im there!!
June 7th, 2008 at 3:22 PMUsing
You mean this Denise Richards? (NSFW, but well worth the click!)
June 7th, 2008 at 5:32 PM:em93: :em03:
Using
Yeah BC, that Denise Richards!
June 8th, 2008 at 8:58 AMUsing
[...] H/T: commenter at Anti-Idiotarian Rotweiller [...]
June 8th, 2008 at 10:46 AMUsing
As I said over at Wattsupwiththat …
The irony is … the expense of complying with the agenda of the Climate Change Cult may lead to a reduction of attention towards other, REAL environmental issues.
It is our prosperity gives us the “luxury” of directing resources to protect the environment. You impair that, by inhibiting the time-management flexibility and freedom-of-movement that are facilitated by our present transportation and utility infrastructures, and you might just find that the environment ends up worse off for it … not better.
When your economic situation makes you wonder where your next meal is coming from, you are more likely to fillet Willy than to free him.
June 8th, 2008 at 12:42 PMUsing